Literature DB >> 17333088

Comparative cost-minimisation of oral and intravenous chemotherapy for first-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer in the UK NHS system.

K Le Lay1, E Myon, S Hill, L Riou-Franca, D Scott, M Sidhu, D Dunlop, R Launois.   

Abstract

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence recommends vinorelbine (VNB), paclitaxel, docetaxel, and gemcitabine in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. An economic model was prepared to determine the comparative cost of these agents, including the new oral formulation of VNB from a United Kingdom National Health System perspective. Clinical effectiveness was determined from published trials. Costs of drug acquisition, administration, toxicity management, and patient transportation costs were calculated from reference publications. A Markov model was used to estimate the cost per patient over 52 weeks. Intravenous VNB, gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and docetaxel incur annual follow-up costs of 3,746 pounds, 5,332 pounds, 5,977 pounds, and 6,766 pounds, respectively, while oral VNB with outpatient administration on d1, and self-administration at home on d8 every 21 days has a cost per patient per year of 2,888 pounds. Oral VNB allows further hospital resources savings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17333088     DOI: 10.1007/s10198-006-0034-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Health Econ        ISSN: 1618-7598


  19 in total

Review 1.  Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine.

Authors:  M C Weinstein; J E Siegel; M R Gold; M S Kamlet; L B Russell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-10-16       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Randomized trial of vinorelbine compared with fluorouracil plus leucovorin in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  J Crawford; M O'Rourke; J H Schiller; C H Spiridonidis; S Yanovich; H Ozer; A Langleben; L Hutchins; A Koletsky; G Clamon; S Burman; R White; J Hohneker; C H Spiridonitis
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Determining transition probabilities: confusion and suggestions.

Authors:  D K Miller; S M Homan
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1994 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Single-agent gemcitabine: an active and better tolerated alternative to standard cisplatin-based chemotherapy in locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  W W ten Bokkel Huinink; B Bergman; A Chemaissani; W Dornoff; P Drings; P L Kellokumpu-Lehtinen; K Liippo; K Mattson; J von Pawel; S Ricci; C Sederholm; R A Stahel; G Wagenius; N V Walree; C Manegold
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.705

5.  Management and survival of patients with lung cancer in Scotland diagnosed in 1995: results of a national population based study.

Authors:  A Gregor; C S Thomson; D H Brewster; P L Stroner; J Davidson; R J Fergusson; R Milroy
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 9.139

6.  A multicenter, randomized, phase III study of docetaxel plus best supportive care versus best supportive care in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic or non-resectable localized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Authors:  K Roszkowski; A Pluzanska; M Krzakowski; A P Smith; E Saigi; U Aasebo; A Parisi; N Pham Tran; R Olivares; J Berille
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.705

7.  A multicenter randomized phase II study of oral vs. intravenous vinorelbine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  J Jassem; R Ramlau; H Karnicka-Młodkowska; K Krawczyk; M Krzakowski; P Zatloukal; E Lemarié; W Hartmann; L Novakova; M O'Brien; A Depierr
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  Economic evaluation of a randomized clinical trial comparing vinorelbine, vinorelbine plus cisplatin, and vindesine plus cisplatin for non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  T J Smith; B E Hillner; D M Neighbors; P A McSorley; T Le Chevalier
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  A Clegg; D A Scott; M Sidhu; P Hewitson; N Waugh
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.014

10.  Gemcitabine plus best supportive care (BSC) vs BSC in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer--a randomized trial with quality of life as the primary outcome. UK NSCLC Gemcitabine Group. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  H Anderson; P Hopwood; R J Stephens; N Thatcher; B Cottier; M Nicholson; R Milroy; T S Maughan; S J Falk; M G Bond; P A Burt; C K Connolly; M B McIllmurray; J Carmichael
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  13 in total

1.  Cellular entry of G3.5 poly (amido amine) dendrimers by clathrin- and dynamin-dependent endocytosis promotes tight junctional opening in intestinal epithelia.

Authors:  Deborah S Goldberg; Hamidreza Ghandehari; Peter W Swaan
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Chemotherapy administration: modelling the costs of alternative protocols.

Authors:  Philip Haywood; Johan de Raad; Kees van Gool; Marion Haas; Gisselle Gallego; Sallie-Anne Pearson; Margaret Faedo; Robyn Ward
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  G3.5 PAMAM dendrimers enhance transepithelial transport of SN38 while minimizing gastrointestinal toxicity.

Authors:  Deborah S Goldberg; Nirmalkumar Vijayalakshmi; Peter W Swaan; Hamidreza Ghandehari
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 9.776

4.  Optimization of oral chemotherapy in outpatient clinics in Spain: results from a survey of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM).

Authors:  A Santaballa; J De Castro; J Maurel; M Lázaro; R Vera; E Alba
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 5.  Economics of treatments for non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Christos Chouaid; Kukovi Atsou; Gilles Hejblum; Alain Vergnenegre
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Boosting the oral bioavailability of anticancer drugs through intentional drug-drug interactions.

Authors:  Eric D Eisenmann; Zahra Talebi; Alex Sparreboom; Sharyn D Baker
Journal:  Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 4.080

7.  Vinorelbine and gemcitabine vs vinorelbine and carboplatin as first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. A phase III randomised controlled trial by the Norwegian Lung Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  Ø Fløtten; B H Grønberg; R Bremnes; T Amundsen; S Sundstrøm; H Rolke; K Hornslien; T Wentzel-Larsen; U Aasebø; C von Plessen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Acceptance of oral chemotherapy in breast cancer patients - a survey study.

Authors:  Sarah Schott; Andreas Schneeweiss; Judith Reinhardt; Thomas Bruckner; Christoph Domschke; Christof Sohn; Michael H Eichbaum
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 9.  Economic evaluation of first-line and maintenance treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christos Chouaïd; Perinne Crequit; Isabelle Borget; Alain Vergnenegre
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2014-12-15

10.  Surface-modified solid lipid nanoparticles for oral delivery of docetaxel: enhanced intestinal absorption and lymphatic uptake.

Authors:  Hyun-Jong Cho; Jin Woo Park; In-Soo Yoon; Dae-Duk Kim
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2014-01-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.