Literature DB >> 10568679

Single-agent gemcitabine: an active and better tolerated alternative to standard cisplatin-based chemotherapy in locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

W W ten Bokkel Huinink1, B Bergman, A Chemaissani, W Dornoff, P Drings, P L Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, K Liippo, K Mattson, J von Pawel, S Ricci, C Sederholm, R A Stahel, G Wagenius, N V Walree, C Manegold.   

Abstract

This randomized study was designed to determine the response rates, survival and toxicities of single-agent gemcitabine (GEMZAR) and a combination of cisplatin/etoposide in chemonaive patients with non-resectable, locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 was given as a 30-min intravenous infusion on days 1, 8, 15 of a 28-day cycle, cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1, and etoposide 100 mg/m2 on days 1 (following cisplatin), 2 and 3. Major eligibility criteria included histologically confirmed non-small cell lung cancer, measurable disease, Zubrod performance status 0-2, no prior chemotherapy, no prior radiation of the measured lesion, and no CNS metastases. One hundred and forty-seven patients were enrolled, 72 in the gemcitabine and 75 in the cisplatin/etoposide arm. Patient characteristics were well-matched across both arms. Sixty-seven gemcitabine and 72 cisplatin/etoposide patients were qualified for efficacy analysis. There were no complete responses, but 12 partial responses in the gemcitabine arm and 11 in the cisplatin/etoposide arm, for protocol-qualified response but 12 partial responses in the gemcitabine arm and 11 in the cisplatin/etoposide arm, for protocol-qualified response rates of 17.9% (95%, CI: 9.6-29.2%,) and 15.3% (95% CI: 7.9-25.7%,), respectively. Median survival times were 6.6 months (95% CI: 4.9-7.3 months) for gemcitabine and 7.6 months (95% CI: 5.4-9.3 months) for cisplatin/etoposide. The 1-year survival probability estimate was 26% for gemcitabine and 24% for cisplatin/etoposide. There were no statistically significant between-group differences in time-to-event measures, but patients in the gemcitabine arm had a greater probability of achieving a tumour response after 2 months (probability estimate: 8 vs. 0%,) and of the response lasting at least 6 months (73 vs. 45%,). Clinical and haematologic toxicity was more pronounced in the cisplatin/etoposide arm. Quality-of-life measures indicated a significant worsening of symptomatology in the cisplatin/etoposide arm for hair loss, nausea and vomiting, and appetite loss. This randomized study provides further evidence that single-agent gemcitabine is an active and effective therapy for patients with non-resectable. locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC and good performance status, and that it is better tolerated than the combination cisplatin/ etoposide.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10568679     DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5002(99)00067-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung Cancer        ISSN: 0169-5002            Impact factor:   5.705


  7 in total

Review 1.  Clinical and cost effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  A Clegg; D A Scott; P Hewitson; M Sidhu; N Waugh
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Economic evaluation of gemcitabine alone and in combination with cisplatin in the treatment of nonsmall cell lung cancer.

Authors:  M Lees; M Aristides; N Maniadakis; J McKendrick; N Botwood; D Stephenson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Comparative cost-minimisation of oral and intravenous chemotherapy for first-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer in the UK NHS system.

Authors:  K Le Lay; E Myon; S Hill; L Riou-Franca; D Scott; M Sidhu; D Dunlop; R Launois
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2007-02-28

4.  A herbal medicine for the treatment of lung cancer.

Authors:  Rama S Ranga; Srinivasan Sowmyalakshmi; Ravshan Burikhanov; Mohammed A Akbarsha; Damodaran Chendil
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.396

5.  Piperine induces apoptosis of lung cancer A549 cells via p53-dependent mitochondrial signaling pathway.

Authors:  Yi Lin; Jianping Xu; Hehe Liao; Lu Li; Lei Pan
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-11-24

6.  First-line gemcitabine with cisplatin or epirubicin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III trial.

Authors:  F M Wachters; J W G Van Putten; H Kramer; Z Erjavec; P Eppinga; J H Strijbos; G P J de Leede; H M Boezen; E G E de Vries; H J M Groen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-10-06       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 7.  The case for the introduction of new chemotherapy agents in the treatment of advanced non small cell lung cancer in the wake of the findings of The National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE).

Authors:  J S Waters; M E R O'Brien
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-08-27       Impact factor: 7.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.