BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with lung cancer in Scotland is poor and not improving. This study was designed to document factors influencing referral, diagnostic evaluation, treatment, and survival in patients with lung cancer. METHODS: Patients diagnosed during 1995 were identified from the Scottish Cancer Registry and their medical records were reviewed. Adequate records were available in 91.2% of all potentially eligible cases. RESULTS: In 1995, patients in Scotland with lung cancer had a high rate of microscopic verification (74.1%) and 75.3% were assessed by a respiratory physician; however, only 56.8% received active treatment (resection 10.7%, radiotherapy 35.8%, chemotherapy 16.1%) and 2.9% participated in a clinical trial. Survival was poor with a median of 3.6 months; 21.1% (95% CI 19.8% to 22.4%) were alive at 1 year and 7.0% (95% CI 6.2% to 7.8%) at 3 years. Management by respiratory physician, oncologist, or thoracic surgeon was an independent predictor of access to potentially curative treatment and better survival. CONCLUSION: This national population based study demonstrates low use of treatment, poor survival, and the influence of process of care on survival. Implementation of evidence-based guidelines will require substantial changes in practice. Increasing the number of patients who receive treatment may improve survival.
BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with lung cancer in Scotland is poor and not improving. This study was designed to document factors influencing referral, diagnostic evaluation, treatment, and survival in patients with lung cancer. METHODS:Patients diagnosed during 1995 were identified from the Scottish Cancer Registry and their medical records were reviewed. Adequate records were available in 91.2% of all potentially eligible cases. RESULTS: In 1995, patients in Scotland with lung cancer had a high rate of microscopic verification (74.1%) and 75.3% were assessed by a respiratory physician; however, only 56.8% received active treatment (resection 10.7%, radiotherapy 35.8%, chemotherapy 16.1%) and 2.9% participated in a clinical trial. Survival was poor with a median of 3.6 months; 21.1% (95% CI 19.8% to 22.4%) were alive at 1 year and 7.0% (95% CI 6.2% to 7.8%) at 3 years. Management by respiratory physician, oncologist, or thoracic surgeon was an independent predictor of access to potentially curative treatment and better survival. CONCLUSION: This national population based study demonstrates low use of treatment, poor survival, and the influence of process of care on survival. Implementation of evidence-based guidelines will require substantial changes in practice. Increasing the number of patients who receive treatment may improve survival.
Authors: E J Maher; A Timothy; C J Squire; A Goodman; S J Karp; C H Paine; R Ryall; G Read Journal: Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) Date: 1993 Impact factor: 4.126
Authors: R Feld; R Abratt; S Graziano; J Jassem; L Lacquet; V Ninane; M Paesmans; P Rocmans; C Schiepers; R Stahel; R Stephens Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 1997-06 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: E Kesson; C E Bucknall; L G McAlpine; R Milroy; D Hole; D R Vernon; F Macbeth; C R Gillis Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 1998-11 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: A Imperatori; R N Harrison; D N Leitch; F Rovera; G Lepore; G Dionigi; P Sutton; L Dominioni Journal: Thorax Date: 2005-11-11 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: M L Cartman; A C Hatfield; M F Muers; M D Peake; R A Haward; D Forman Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: P P Melling; A C Hatfield; M F Muers; M D Peake; C J Storer; C E Round; R A Haward; S M Crawford Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2002-01-07 Impact factor: 7.640