Literature DB >> 10945489

Gemcitabine plus best supportive care (BSC) vs BSC in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer--a randomized trial with quality of life as the primary outcome. UK NSCLC Gemcitabine Group. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

H Anderson1, P Hopwood, R J Stephens, N Thatcher, B Cottier, M Nicholson, R Milroy, T S Maughan, S J Falk, M G Bond, P A Burt, C K Connolly, M B McIllmurray, J Carmichael.   

Abstract

Three hundred patients with symptomatic, locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC not requiring immediate radiotherapy were enrolled into this randomized multicentre trial comparing gemcitabine + BSC vs BSC alone. Patients allocated gemcitabine received 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle, for a maximum of six cycles. The main aim of this trial was to compare patient assessment of a predefined subset of commonly reported symptoms (SS14) from the EORTC QLQ-C30 and LC13 scales. The primary end-points were defined as (1) the percentage change in mean SS14 score between baseline and 2 months and (2) the proportion of patients with a marked (> or = 25%) improvement in SS14 score between baseline and 2 months sustained for > or =4 weeks. The secondary objectives were to compare treatments with respect to overall survival, and multidimensional QL parameters. The treatment groups were balanced with regard to age, gender, Karnofsky performance status (KPS) and disease stage (40% had metastatic disease). The percentage change in mean SS14 score from baseline to 2 months was a 10% decrease (i.e. improvement) for gemcitabine plus BSC and a 1% increase (i.e. deterioration) for BSC alone (P = 0.113, two-sample t-test). A sustained (> or = 4 weeks) improvement (> or =25%) on SS14 was recorded in a significantly higher proportion of gemcitabine + BSC patients (22%) than in BSC alone patients (9%) (P = 0.0014, Pearson's chi-squared test). The QLQ-C30 and L13 subscales showed greater improvement in the gemcitabine plus BSC arm (in 11 domains) than in the BSC arm (one symptom item). There was greater deterioration in the BSC alone arm (six domains/items) than in the gemcitabine + BSC arm (three QL domains). Tumour response occurred in 19% (95% CI 13-27) of gemcitabine patients. There was no difference in overall survival: median 5.7 months (95% CI 4.6-7.6) for gemcitabine + BSC patients and 5.9 months (95% CI 5.0-7.9) (log-rank, P = 0.84) for BSC patients, and 1 -year survival was 25% for gemcitabine + BSC and 22% for BSC. Overall, 74 (49%) gemcitabine + BSC patients and 119 (79%) BSC patients received palliative radiotherapy. The median time to radiotherapy was 29 weeks for gemcitabine + BSC patients and 3.8 weeks for BSC. Patients treated with gemcitabine + BSC reported better QL and reduced disease-related symptoms compared with those receiving BSC alone. These improvements in patient-assessed QL were significant in magnitude and were sustained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10945489      PMCID: PMC2374661          DOI: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  19 in total

1.  Quality of life in cancer trials.

Authors:  D Brinkley
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-09-14

2.  Approaches to the analysis of quality of life data: experiences gained from a medical research council lung cancer working party palliative chemotherapy trial.

Authors:  P Hopwood; R J Stephens; D Machin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Quality of life during chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  C Fernandez; R Rosell; A Abad-Esteve; P Monras; I Moreno; M Serichol; M Roviralta
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.089

4.  Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  S J Pocock; R Simon
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)

Authors:  J D Cox; J Stetz; T F Pajak
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1995-03-30       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  The EORTC QLQ-LC13: a modular supplement to the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) for use in lung cancer clinical trials. EORTC Study Group on Quality of Life.

Authors:  B Bergman; N K Aaronson; S Ahmedzai; S Kaasa; M Sullivan
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 9.162

7.  The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology.

Authors:  N K Aaronson; S Ahmedzai; B Bergman; M Bullinger; A Cull; N J Duez; A Filiberti; H Flechtner; S B Fleishman; J C de Haes
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-03-03       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Symptom relief with moderate dose chemotherapy (mitomycin-C, vinblastine and cisplatin) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  J R Hardy; T Noble; I E Smith
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Randomised trial of four-drug vs less intensive two-drug chemotherapy in the palliative treatment of patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and poor prognosis. Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Symptoms at presentation for treatment in patients with lung cancer: implications for the evaluation of palliative treatment. The Medical Research Council (MRC) Lung Cancer Working Party.

Authors:  P Hopwood; R J Stephens
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  47 in total

Review 1.  Quality-of-life assessment in phase III clinical trials of gemcitabine in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan K Reynolds; Terri L Levien
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 2.  Clinical and cost effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  A Clegg; D A Scott; P Hewitson; M Sidhu; N Waugh
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 3.  Effect of chemotherapy on quality of life in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Eileen Mannion; J J Gilmartin; Paul Donnellan; Maccon Keane; Dympna Waldron
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Combination chemotherapy in the treatment of inoperable non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  R M Rutherford; T Azher; J J Gilmartin
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2002 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 5.  Lung cancer.

Authors:  Alan Neville
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2009-04-21

Review 6.  Chemotherapy in addition to supportive care improves survival in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 16 randomized controlled trials.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-08-04       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Rational use of cetuximab in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Charu Aggarwal; Hossein Borghaei
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation (EGFR) Testing for Prediction of Response to EGFR-Targeting Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) Drugs in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: An Evidence-Based Analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2010-12-01

9.  Paclitaxel alters the expression and specific activity of deoxycytidine kinase and cytidine deaminase in non-small cell lung cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Stacy S Shord; Shitalben R Patel
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-06-06

10.  Resistance gene expression determines the in vitro chemosensitivity of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Authors:  Sharon Glaysher; Dennis Yiannakis; Francis G Gabriel; Penny Johnson; Marta E Polak; Louise A Knight; Zoe Goldthorpe; Katharine Peregrin; Mya Gyi; Paul Modi; Joe Rahamim; Mark E Smith; Khalid Amer; Bruce Addis; Matthew Poole; Ajit Narayanan; Tim J Gulliford; Peter E Andreotti; Ian A Cree
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.