Literature DB >> 8874339

Randomized trial of vinorelbine compared with fluorouracil plus leucovorin in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer.

J Crawford1, M O'Rourke, J H Schiller, C H Spiridonidis, S Yanovich, H Ozer, A Langleben, L Hutchins, A Koletsky, G Clamon, S Burman, R White, J Hohneker, C H Spiridonitis.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This prospective randomized trial was performed to compare the effectiveness of intravenous vinorelbine tartrate with intravenous fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV) on the primary end points of survival, quality of life (QOL), and relief of cancer-related symptoms in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Secondary end points included tumor response rates and time to treatment failure. In addition, the safety of both treatment regimens was evaluated in this multicenter study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred sixteen patients with stage IV NSCLC were enrolled onto this study from 18 centers. Vinorelbine was administered at a dose of 30 mg/m2/wk. 5-FU/LV was administered at a dose of 425 mg/m2 and 20 mg/m2, respectively, for 5 consecutive days every 4 weeks. Patients with progressive disease or toxicity were removed from study while responding and stable patients were continued on therapy.
RESULTS: The median survival time of patients who received vinorelbine was 30 weeks, with 25% of patients alive at 1 year, compared with a median survival time of 22 weeks and 16% of patients alive at 1 year for those treated with 5-FU/LV (P = .03, log-rank test). This improvement in survival was associated with a higher objective response rate (12% v 3%) and time to treatment failure (10 weeks v 8 weeks) for vinorelbine versus 5-FU/LV. The dose-limiting toxicity of vinorelbine was granulocytopenia, with 54% of patients experiencing grade 3/4 granulocytopenia. Nonhematologic toxicity of vinorelbine was generally grade 1 or 2. The most common grade 3 toxicities were related to injection-site reactions.
CONCLUSION: This trial confirms the efficacy of vinorelbine in patients with advanced NSCLC. The clinical activity and relatively favorable toxicity profile of this agent make it a reasonable and useful treatment option in the management of patients with this disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8874339     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.10.2774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  16 in total

Review 1.  Chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  C J Sweeney; A B Sandler
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 2.  50 Years of progress in the systemic therapy of non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Heather Wakelee; Karen Kelly; Martin J Edelman
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2014

Review 3.  Clinical and cost effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  A Clegg; D A Scott; P Hewitson; M Sidhu; N Waugh
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 9.139

4.  Cisplatin plus continuous infusion vinorelbine for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase I-II study.

Authors:  M Cobo-Dols; S Gil-Calle; E Villar-Chamorro; I Alés-Díaz; F Carabantes-Ocón; J Alcalde-García; V Gutiérrez-Calderón; A Montesa-Pino; J J Bretón-García; M Benavides-Orgaz
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 5.  Adaptive control methods for the dose individualisation of anticancer agents.

Authors:  A Rousseau; P Marquet; J Debord; C Sabot; G Lachâtre
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Vinorelbine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. A pharmacoeconomic review.

Authors:  A J Coukell; S Noble; D Faulds
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  New oral chemotherapeutic agents for lung cancer.

Authors:  E M Bengtson; J R Rigas
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Comparative cost-minimisation of oral and intravenous chemotherapy for first-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer in the UK NHS system.

Authors:  K Le Lay; E Myon; S Hill; L Riou-Franca; D Scott; M Sidhu; D Dunlop; R Launois
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2007-02-28

Review 9.  Issues surrounding clinical trial endpoints in solid malignancies with a focus on metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Edward B Garon
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 5.705

Review 10.  Clinical studies with MTA.

Authors:  A H Calvert; J M Walling
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.