Literature DB >> 17325418

Retinal charge sensitivity and spatial discrimination obtainable by subretinal implants: key lessons learned from isolated chicken retina.

Alfred Stett1, Andreas Mai, Thoralf Herrmann.   

Abstract

In order to obtain functional parameters relevant to the designing of a subretinal implant, we carried out electrical stimulation experiments with isolated chicken retina. The median threshold for network activation with planar disc electrodes (diameter 10 microm) was 0.5 nC (625 microC cm(-2)) for anodal voltage impulses and 1.6 nC (2 mC cm(-2)) for cathodal impulses. Above threshold, the number of spikes evoked by a single voltage impulse increased up to saturation within a range of injected charge from 0.1 nC to 1 nC for anodal impulses and from 1 nC to 10 nC for cathodal impulses. Using needle electrodes with a tip diameter of 1 microm, we determined the electrical point spread function (EPSF) for subretinal stimulation. It had a half width in the range of 100 microm, which corresponds to a visual angle of 21' and to a visual acuity of 20/417 in the human eye. It is reasonable to conclude that with subretinal implants the minimum separable will be of the same dimension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17325418     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/4/1/S02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  17 in total

1.  Response variability to high rates of electric stimulation in retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Changsi Cai; Qiushi Ren; Neal J Desai; Joseph F Rizzo; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Upper threshold of extracellular neural stimulation.

Authors:  David Boinagrov; Susanne Pangratz-Fuehrer; Bongsoo Suh; Keith Mathieson; Natasha Naik; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Responses to pulsatile subretinal electric stimulation: effects of amplitude and duration.

Authors:  Seung Woo Lee; Donald K Eddington; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Simultaneous recording of mouse retinal ganglion cells during epiretinal or subretinal stimulation.

Authors:  S L Sim; R J Szalewski; L J Johnson; L E Akah; L E Shoemaker; W B Thoreson; E Margalit
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Calcium channel dynamics limit synaptic release in response to prosthetic stimulation with sinusoidal waveforms.

Authors:  Daniel K Freeman; Jed S Jeng; Shawn K Kelly; Espen Hartveit; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  Feasibility of Neural Stimulation With Floating-Light-Activated Microelectrical Stimulators.

Authors:  Ammar Abdo; Mesut Sahin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 3.833

Review 7.  Encoding visual information in retinal ganglion cells with prosthetic stimulation.

Authors:  Daniel K Freeman; Joseph F Rizzo; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  The response of retinal neurons to high-frequency stimulation.

Authors:  Changsi Cai; Perry Twyford; Shelley Fried
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Photovoltaic retinal prosthesis: implant fabrication and performance.

Authors:  Lele Wang; K Mathieson; T I Kamins; J D Loudin; L Galambos; G Goetz; A Sher; Y Mandel; P Huie; D Lavinsky; J S Harris; D V Palanker
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Quasi-monopolar stimulation: a novel electrode design configuration for performance optimization of a retinal neuroprosthesis.

Authors:  Gita Khalili Moghadam; Robert Wilke; Gregg J Suaning; Nigel H Lovell; Socrates Dokos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.