Literature DB >> 11408140

Effect of preoperative pupil measurements on glare, halos, and visual function after photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy.

W W Haw1, E E Manche.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively assess the effect of preoperative variables such as pupil size on glare, halos, and visual function after photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy (PARK).
SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
METHODS: Ninety-three eyes had PARK for primary compound myopic astigmatism. Preoperative pupil diameters were measured under scotopic and photopic illuminance conditions. Postoperatively, patients were evaluated at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months. A regression model was performed to evaluate the predictive value of assessing preoperative variables such as pupil diameter on the development of glare and halos, contrast sensitivity, and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) under scotopic, photopic, and glare conditions.
RESULTS: The greater magnitude loss of BSCVA under scotopic conditions in the early postoperative period as well as the slower recovery to preoperative levels in eyes with larger scotopic pupil diameters were not statistically significant (P >.05). An increase in symptoms of glare was related more to the attempted level of spherical equivalent (SE) correction than to the pupil size during the first 12 postoperative months (P <.01). The photoablation dimensions as determined by the attempted level of astigmatic correction may result in decreases in the glare BSCVA up to 12 months after PARK (P =.03). At the 2 year follow-up, pupil diameter under both scotopic and photopic illuminance conditions was not predictive of any of the measured outcomes variables.
CONCLUSIONS: An assessment of preoperative pupil size and the attempted level of both SE and astigmatic correction may be useful in identifying patients at risk of developing symptoms or declines in visual performance after PARK. However, follow-up studies are indicated to identify variables predictive of poor visual outcomes following excimer laser refractive surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11408140     DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(01)00871-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of three different technologies for pupil diameter measurement.

Authors:  Sabine Schmitz; Frank Krummenauer; Sebastian Henn; H Burkhard Dick
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-05-09       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  [Optical quality after refractive corneal surgery].

Authors:  T Kohnen; J Bühren; M Cichocki; T Kasper; E Terzi; C Ohrloff
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Evaluation of disk halo size after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

Authors:  Tian Han; Feng Zhao; Xun Chen; Huamao Miao; Zhuoyi Chen; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Night vision disturbances after successful LASIK surgery.

Authors:  César Villa; Ramón Gutiérrez; José Ramón Jiménez; José Manuel González-Méijome
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Minimum pupil in pupillary response to light and myopia affect disk halo size: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Feng Zhao; Tian Han; Xun Chen; Zhi Chen; Ke Zheng; Xiaoying Wang; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.