Literature DB >> 10964847

Functional outcome and satisfaction after photorefractive keratectomy. Part 2: survey of 690 patients.

I Brunette1, J Gresset, J F Boivin, M Pop, P Thompson, G P Lafond, H Makni.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To document patient satisfaction and self-perceived quality of vision after bilateral photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).
DESIGN: Noncomparative, interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive patients who underwent bilateral PRK from May 1994 through May 1997 by the 12 surgeons of four collaborating centers with a minimum of 4 months since the last surgery and up to 30 months since the first surgery.
METHODS: A questionnaire with known psychometric properties was self-administered by the patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Responses to individual questions and scale scores.
RESULTS: A total of 929 questionnaires were sent, of which 690 were answered and returned (74.3% response rate). The preoperative spherical equivalent ranged from -0.38 diopters [D] to -27.75 D (mean, -5.32 D; standard deviation, 2.85 D). Although 91.8% of the patients were satisfied or very satisfied with their surgery, 96.3% considered that their main goal had been reached, and 95.7% would still choose to have surgery if they had it to do over. The degree of satisfaction was proportional to the postoperative uncorrected visual acuity in the best eye expressed in LogMAR (r = -0.18, P: = 0. 0001) and was negatively correlated with the importance of the corneal haze (r = -0.23, P = 0.0001). Daytime glare was reported to be greater than before surgery by 55.1% of patients. A decrease in night vision was reported by 31.7% of patients, and 31.1% of patients reported increased difficulty driving at night because of their vision.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall satisfaction after PRK for low to severe myopia appears to be very good. Glare and night vision disturbance, particularly bothersome for night driving, seem to constitute significant secondary effects that deserve further investigation and should be kept in mind for future improvements in the technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10964847     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00267-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  11 in total

Review 1.  [Optical quality after refractive corneal surgery].

Authors:  T Kohnen; J Bühren; M Cichocki; T Kasper; E Terzi; C Ohrloff
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Retinal straylight and light distortion phenomena in normal and post-LASIK eyes.

Authors:  Alejandro Cerviño; Cesar Villa-Collar; Jose Manuel Gonzalez-Meijome; Teresa Ferrer-Blasco; Santiago García-Lázaro
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Visual and non-visual factors associated with patient satisfaction and quality of life in LASIK.

Authors:  P Lazon de la Jara; D Erickson; P Erickson; F Stapleton
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Night vision disturbances after successful LASIK surgery.

Authors:  César Villa; Ramón Gutiérrez; José Ramón Jiménez; José Manuel González-Méijome
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (Lasik) versus wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy (Prk): a prospective randomized eye-to-eye comparison (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Authors:  Edward E Manche; Weldon W Haw
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2011-12

6.  Visual quality after wavefront-guided LASIK for myopia.

Authors:  Hyojin Kim; Choun-Ki Joo
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.153

7.  Analysis of the visual and refractive outcome following laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) retreatment over a four-year follow-up period.

Authors:  Ayman Saeed; Maeve O'Doherty; John O'Doherty; Michael O'Keefe
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-03-24       Impact factor: 2.029

8.  Corneal Aberrations, Contrast Sensitivity, and Light Distortion in Orthokeratology Patients: 1-Year Results.

Authors:  Elena Santolaria-Sanz; Alejandro Cerviño; José M González-Méijome
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 1.909

9.  Mesopic Functional Visual Acuity in Normal Subjects.

Authors:  Takahiro Hiraoka; Sujin Hoshi; Yoshifumi Okamoto; Fumiki Okamoto; Tetsuro Oshika
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Prospective Randomized Multicenter Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes of V4c and V5 Implantable Collamer Lenses: A Contralateral Eye Study.

Authors:  Takashi Kojima; Yoshihiro Kitazawa; Tomoaki Nakamura; Masahide Takahashi; Kazutaka Kamiya; Kazuo Ichikawa; Akihito Igarashi; Kimiya Shimizu
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 1.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.