Literature DB >> 17311120

Symptomatic failure after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: a rare but challenging condition.

Massimo Fineschi1, Tommaso Gori, Carlo Pierli, Stefano Casini, Giuseppe Sinicropi, Alberto Buti, Alessandro Iadanza, Achille Bravi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Limited information is available regarding restenosis after implantation of a sirolimus-eluting stent (SES).
OBJECTIVE: To report on angiographic characteristics, clinical presentation and treatment of this particularly complex type of coronary lesion. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A total of 1424 SES were implanted in 1159 patients (average 1.2 per patient) for chronic or acute coronary syndromes in the University Hospital of Siena (Siena, Italy), which is a tertiary centre. Symptomatic in-SES restenosis was observed in 26 patients (2.2%) at 10+/-5 months (median eight months, range four to 23 months) following the initial intervention. In-SES restenosis was associated with stable angina in 16 patients, acute myocardial infarction in three patients and unstable angina in seven patients. Two patients had restenosis in two separate SES. Conditions often associated with in-SES restenosis included treatment of chronic total occlusion, geographic miss or in-stent restenosis during the index procedure. Among the first 20 patients, those with focal, in-body SES (type Ic) restenosis received balloon-only angioplasty, and patients with other patterns received repeat SES implantation. Clinical and angiographic follow-up (average 16+/-7 months) recorded one death (noncardiac) in the balloon-only group and four cases of unstable angina (three due to relapsing in-SES restenosis in the balloon-only group and the fourth due to a de novo lesion). Follow-up quantitative angiography showed a higher incidence of binary restenosis after balloon-only treatment (57% versus 17%; P<0.05), as well as higher lumen loss and loss index (P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Restenosis after SES implantation occurs more commonly in a focal pattern in-body or at the proximal edge of the stent. Repeat SES implantation appears to be a safer and more effective therapeutic choice than balloon-only angioplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17311120      PMCID: PMC2650650          DOI: 10.1016/s0828-282x(07)70734-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Cardiol        ISSN: 0828-282X            Impact factor:   5.223


  13 in total

1.  Percutaneous treatment of focal vs. diffuse in-stent restenosis: a prospective randomized comparison of conventional therapies.

Authors:  Michael Ragosta; Habib Samady; Lawrence W Gimple; Ian J Sarembock; Michael Fenster; Eric R Powers
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Outcome of percutaneous hybrid coronary revascularization: bare metal stents jeopardize the benefit of sirolimus-eluting stents in the real world.

Authors:  Massimo Fineschi; Tommaso Gori; Carlo Pierli; Stefano Casini; Giuseppe Sinicropi; Alberto Buti; Alessia Del Pasqua; Achille Bravi
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.223

3.  Long-term clinical follow-up after successful repeat percutaneous intervention for stent restenosis.

Authors:  B Reimers; I Moussa; T Akiyama; G Tucci; M Ferraro; G Martini; S Blengino; C Di Mario; A Colombo
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis: classification and implications for long-term outcome.

Authors:  R Mehran; G Dangas; A S Abizaid; G S Mintz; A J Lansky; L F Satler; A D Pichard; K M Kent; G W Stone; M B Leon
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-11-02       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Preliminary observations regarding angiographic pattern of restenosis after rapamycin-eluting stent implantation.

Authors:  Antonio Colombo; Dejan Orlic; Goran Stankovic; Nicola Corvaja; Vassilis Spanos; Matteo Montorfano; Francesco Liistro; Mauro Carlino; Flavio Airoldi; Alaide Chieffo; Carlo Di Mario
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-04-28       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Sirolimus-eluting stent or paclitaxel-eluting stent vs balloon angioplasty for prevention of recurrences in patients with coronary in-stent restenosis: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Adnan Kastrati; Julinda Mehilli; Nicolas von Beckerath; Alban Dibra; Jörg Hausleiter; Jürgen Pache; Helmut Schühlen; Claus Schmitt; Josef Dirschinger; Albert Schömig
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Sirolimus-eluting stent for treatment of complex in-stent restenosis: the first clinical experience.

Authors:  Muzaffer Degertekin; Evelyn Regar; Kengo Tanabe; Pieter C Smits; Willem J van der Giessen; Stephan G Carlier; Pim de Feyter; Jeroen Vos; David P Foley; Jurgen M R Ligthart; Jeffrey J Popma; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of patients with long atherosclerotic lesions in small coronary arteries: double-blind, randomised controlled trial (E-SIRIUS).

Authors:  Joachim Schofer; Michael Schlüter; Anthony H Gershlick; William Wijns; Eulogio Garcia; Erick Schampaert; Günter Breithardt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-10-04       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Coronary restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: morphological description and mechanistic analysis from a consecutive series of cases.

Authors:  Pedro A Lemos; Francesco Saia; Jurgen M R Ligthart; Chourmouzios A Arampatzis; Georgios Sianos; Kengo Tanabe; Angela Hoye; Muzaffer Degertekin; Joost Daemen; Eugene McFadden; Sjoerd Hofma; Pieter C Smits; Pim de Feyter; Willem J van der Giessen; Ron T van Domburg; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-07-14       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Moses; Martin B Leon; Jeffrey J Popma; Peter J Fitzgerald; David R Holmes; Charles O'Shaughnessy; Ronald P Caputo; Dean J Kereiakes; David O Williams; Paul S Teirstein; Judith L Jaeger; Richard E Kuntz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-10-02       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.