Literature DB >> 9207641

Long-term clinical follow-up after successful repeat percutaneous intervention for stent restenosis.

B Reimers1, I Moussa, T Akiyama, G Tucci, M Ferraro, G Martini, S Blengino, C Di Mario, A Colombo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the long-term clinical outcome of successful repeat percutaneous intervention after in-stent restenosis.
BACKGROUND: Recurrence of symptoms and angiographic restenosis after stent implantation are observed in 15% to 35% of cases. Repeat percutaneous treatment for in-stent restenosis has been shown to be safe, with high immediate success, but little is known about the long-term clinical outcome.
METHODS: Clinical follow-up (minimum 9 months) was obtained in a consecutive series of 124 patients (127 vessels) presenting with stent restenosis who were successfully treated with repeat percutaneous intervention.
RESULTS: Clinical follow-up was obtained in all 124 patients at a mean [+/-SD] of 27.4 +/- 14.7 months (range 9 to 66); a stress test was available in 88 patients (71%). Recurrence of clinical events occurred in 25 patients (20%) and included death from any cause in 2 patients (2%), target vessel revascularization in 14 (11%), myocardial infarction in 1 (1%) and positive stress test results or recurrence of symptoms (Canadian Cardiovascular Society class I to IV) treated medically in 8 (6%). Cumulative event-free survival at 12 and 24 months was 86.2% and 80.7%, respectively. Significant predictive factors of recurrence of clinical events were repeat intervention in saphenous vein grafts, multivessel disease, low ejection fraction and a < or = 3-month interval between stent implantation and repeat intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: In-stent balloon angioplasty for stent restenosis in native vessels seems to be an effective method in terms of a low long-term clinical event rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9207641     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00142-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  10 in total

Review 1.  New recipes for in-stent restenosis: cut, grate, roast, or sandwich the neointima?

Authors:  C Di Mario; F Marsico; M Adamian; E Karvouni; R Albiero; A Colombo
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Current understanding of coronary in-stent restenosis. Pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic work-up, and management.

Authors:  T M Schiele
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2005-11

3.  Hyperplasia suppression by Ho:YAG laser intravascular irradiation in rabbit.

Authors:  Eriko Nakatani; Tsunenori Arai
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2006-05-04       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 4.  Nanocarriers for tracking and treating diseases.

Authors:  Sean Marrache; Rakesh Kumar Pathak; Kasey L Darley; Joshua H Choi; Dhillon Zaver; Nagesh Kolishetti; Shanta Dhar
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 5.  [Pathophysiology and therapeutic concepts in coronary restenosis].

Authors:  H G Klues; P W Radke; R Hoffmann; J vom Dahl
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 6.  [Stent restenosis: therapy concepts and possibilities for prevention].

Authors:  P W Radke; J vom Dahl; H G Klues
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1999-02-15

7.  Clinical and angiographic outcome in patients with in-stent restenosis and repeat target lesion revascularisation in small coronary arteries.

Authors:  C M Gross; J Krämer; O Weingärtner; F Uhlich; R Dietz; J Waigand
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Symptomatic failure after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: a rare but challenging condition.

Authors:  Massimo Fineschi; Tommaso Gori; Carlo Pierli; Stefano Casini; Giuseppe Sinicropi; Alberto Buti; Alessandro Iadanza; Achille Bravi
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 9.  Current advances in research and clinical applications of PLGA-based nanotechnology.

Authors:  Jian-Ming Lü; Xinwen Wang; Christian Marin-Muller; Hao Wang; Peter H Lin; Qizhi Yao; Changyi Chen
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.225

10.  Outcomes of second revascularization procedures after stent implantation.

Authors:  Richard P Konstance; Eric L Eisenstein; Kevin J Anstrom; Linda K Shaw; Robert M Califf; Robert A Harrington; David B Matchar; Kevin A Schulman; David F Kong
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.460

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.