Literature DB >> 19087164

Neural representations of auditory input accommodate to the context in a dynamically changing acoustic environment.

Torsten Rahne1, Elyse Sussman.   

Abstract

The auditory scene is dynamic, changing from 1 min to the next as sound sources enter and leave our space. How does the brain resolve the problem of maintaining neural representations of the distinct yet changing sound sources? We used an auditory streaming paradigm to test the dynamics of multiple sound source representation, when switching between integrated and segregated sound streams. The mismatch negativity (MMN) component of event-related potentials was used as index of change detection to observe stimulus-driven modulation of the ongoing sound organization. Probe tones were presented randomly within ambiguously organized sound sequences to reveal whether the neurophysiological representation of the sounds was integrated (no MMN) or segregated (MMN). The pattern of results demonstrated context-dependent responses to a single tone that was modulated in dynamic fashion as the auditory environment rapidly changed from integrated to segregated sounds. This suggests a rapid form of auditory plasticity in which the longer-term sound context influences the current state of neural activity when it is ambiguous. These results demonstrate stimulus-driven modulation of neural activity that accommodates to the dynamically changing acoustic environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19087164      PMCID: PMC2649007          DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06561.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  26 in total

1.  Dynamic sensory updating in the auditory system.

Authors:  E Sussman; I Winkler
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2001-12

2.  Mismatch negativity is unaffected by top-down predictive information.

Authors:  T Rinne; S Antila; I Winkler
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-07-20       Impact factor: 1.837

Review 3.  "Primitive intelligence" in the auditory cortex.

Authors:  R Näätänen; M Tervaniemi; E Sussman; P Paavilainen; I Winkler
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 13.837

4.  Two cognitive systems simultaneously prepared for opposite events.

Authors:  W Ritter; E Sussman; D Deacon; N Cowan; H G Vaughan
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Effects of temporal encoding on auditory object formation: a mismatch negativity study.

Authors:  Mercedes Atienza; Jose L Cantero; Carles Grau; Carlos Gomez; Elena Dominguez-Marin; Carles Escera
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2003-05

6.  Postrecognition of interleaved melodies as an indirect measure of auditory stream formation.

Authors:  Caroline Bey; Stephen McAdams
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Effects of context on auditory stream segregation.

Authors:  Joel S Snyder; Olivia L Carter; Suh-Kyung Lee; Erin E Hannon; Claude Alain
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Effects of attention and unilateral neglect on auditory stream segregation.

Authors:  R P Carlyon; R Cusack; J M Foxton; I H Robertson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  The role of large-scale memory organization in the mismatch negativity event-related brain potential.

Authors:  I Winkler; E Schröger; N Cowan
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 10.  Mismatch negativity: different water in the same river.

Authors:  T W Picton; C Alain; L Otten; W Ritter; A Achim
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2000 May-Aug       Impact factor: 1.854

View more
  13 in total

1.  Attention effects on auditory scene analysis: insights from event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  Mona Isabel Spielmann; Erich Schröger; Sonja A Kotz; Alexandra Bendixen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-02-20

Review 2.  The five myths of MMN: redefining how to use MMN in basic and clinical research.

Authors:  E S Sussman; S Chen; J Sussman-Fort; E Dinces
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Behavioral correlates of auditory streaming in rhesus macaques.

Authors:  Kate L Christison-Lagay; Yale E Cohen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Effects of task-switching on neural representations of ambiguous sound input.

Authors:  Elyse S Sussman; Albert S Bregman; Wei-Wei Lee
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 5.  Mismatch negativity (MMN) as an index of cognitive dysfunction.

Authors:  Risto Näätänen; Elyse S Sussman; Dean Salisbury; Valerie L Shafer
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  Regularity extraction from non-adjacent sounds.

Authors:  Alexandra Bendixen; Erich Schröger; Walter Ritter; István Winkler
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-05-21

7.  Temporal Integration of Auditory Information Is Invariant to Temporal Grouping Cues

Authors:  Andrew S K Liu; Joji Tsunada; Joshua I Gold; Yale E Cohen
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2015-04-30

Review 8.  Predictability effects in auditory scene analysis: a review.

Authors:  Alexandra Bendixen
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Attention Matters: Pitch vs. Pattern Processing in Adolescence.

Authors:  Elyse S Sussman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-06-10

10.  Using a staircase procedure for the objective measurement of auditory stream integration and segregation thresholds.

Authors:  Mona Spielmann; Erich Schröger; Sonja A Kotz; Thomas Pechmann; Alexandra Bendixen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-08-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.