Literature DB >> 16965603

Preattentively grouped tones do not elicit MMN with respect to each other.

Walter Ritter1, Pierfilippo De Sanctis, Sophie Molholm, Daniel C Javitt, John J Foxe.   

Abstract

To promote preattenive grouping of two sets of tones, one set of tones with a combination of frequency and ear of delivery was intermixed with another set of tones with a different combination of frequency and ear of delivery. The ERPs elicited by tones delivered to one ear that were preceded by three or four tones delivered in a row to the other ear were associated with an enhanced N1, due to the changes in frequency and ear of delivery with respect to the immediately preceding tones. However, no mismatch negativity (MMN) was obtained, even though these tones differed from the previious tones on the two dimensions of frequency and ear of delivery. The data were interpreted to signify that preattentively grouped sets of tones do not elicit MMN with respect to one another. This implies that once acoustic input has been preattentively grouped, the MMN system is dedicated to detecting changes that occur within but not between preattentively grouped stimuli.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16965603      PMCID: PMC1779906          DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00423.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  23 in total

1.  Evidence that the mismatch negativity system works on the basis of objects.

Authors:  W Ritter; E Sussman; S Molholm
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2000-01-17       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  The effect of perceptual grouping on the mismatch negativity.

Authors:  H Gaeta; D Friedman; W Ritter; J Cheng
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Can echoic memory store two traces simultaneously? A study of event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  I Winkler; P Paavilainen; R Näätänen
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  The independence of memory traces of attended and unattended stimuli.

Authors:  David N McKenzie; Robert J Barry
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Simultaneous ERP and fMRI of the auditory cortex in a passive oddball paradigm.

Authors:  Einat Liebenthal; Michael L Ellingson; Marianna V Spanaki; Thomas E Prieto; Kristina M Ropella; Jeffrey R Binder
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Interactions between Transient and Long-Term Auditory Memory as Reflected by the Mismatch Negativity.

Authors:  I Winkler; N Cowan; V Csépe; I Czigler; R Näätänen
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Variable cerebral responses to equally distinct deviance in four auditory dimensions: a mismatch negativity study.

Authors:  L Y Deouell; S Bentin
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Adaptive modeling of the unattended acoustic environment reflected in the mismatch negativity event-related potential.

Authors:  I Winkler; G Karmos; R Näätänen
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1996-12-02       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Memory template comparison processes in anhedonia and dysthymia.

Authors:  J E Giese-Davis; G A Miller; R A Knight
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Processing of auditory deviants with changes in one versus two stimulus dimensions.

Authors:  E Schröger
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.016

View more
  6 in total

1.  Visual cues can modulate integration and segregation of objects in auditory scene analysis.

Authors:  Torsten Rahne; Martin Böckmann; Hellmut von Specht; Elyse S Sussman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-01-27       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Auditory scene analysis: the interaction of stimulation rate and frequency separation on pre-attentive grouping.

Authors:  Pierfilippo De Sanctis; Walter Ritter; Sophie Molholm; Simon P Kelly; John J Foxe
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.386

3.  "What" and "where" in auditory sensory processing: a high-density electrical mapping study of distinct neural processes underlying sound object recognition and sound localization.

Authors:  Victoria M Leavitt; Sophie Molholm; Manuel Gomez-Ramirez; John J Foxe
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-22

4.  Automatic cortical representation of auditory pitch changes in Rett syndrome.

Authors:  John J Foxe; Kelly M Burke; Gizely N Andrade; Aleksandra Djukic; Hans-Peter Frey; Sophie Molholm
Journal:  J Neurodev Disord       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 4.025

5.  Right Hemispheric Contributions to Fine Auditory Temporal Discriminations: High-Density Electrical Mapping of the Duration Mismatch Negativity (MMN).

Authors:  Pierfilippo De Sanctis; Sophie Molholm; Marina Shpaner; Walter Ritter; John J Foxe
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-20

6.  Individuals With Autism Have No Detectable Deficit in Neural Markers of Prediction Error When Presented With Auditory Rhythms of Varied Temporal Complexity.

Authors:  Emily J Knight; Leona Oakes; Susan L Hyman; Edward G Freedman; John J Foxe
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 4.633

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.