Literature DB >> 25281308

Effects of task-switching on neural representations of ambiguous sound input.

Elyse S Sussman1, Albert S Bregman2, Wei-Wei Lee3.   

Abstract

The ability to perceive discrete sound streams in the presence of competing sound sources relies on multiple mechanisms that organize the mixture of the auditory input entering the ears. Many studies have focused on mechanisms that contribute to integrating sounds that belong together into one perceptual stream (integration) and segregating those that come from different sound sources (segregation). However, little is known about mechanisms that allow us to perceive individual sound sources within a dynamically changing auditory scene, when the input may be ambiguous, and heard as either integrated or segregated. This study tested the question of whether focusing on one of two possible sound organizations suppressed representation of the alternative organization. We presented listeners with ambiguous input and cued them to switch between tasks that used either the integrated or the segregated percept. Electrophysiological measures indicated which organization was currently maintained in memory. If mutual exclusivity at the neural level was the rule, attention to one of two possible organizations would preclude neural representation of the other. However, significant MMNs were elicited to both the target organization and the unattended, alternative organization, along with the target-related P3b component elicited only to the designated target organization. Results thus indicate that both organizations (integrated and segregated) were simultaneously maintained in memory regardless of which task was performed. Focusing attention to one aspect of the sounds did not abolish the alternative, unattended organization when the stimulus input was ambiguous. In noisy environments, such as walking on a city street, rapid and flexible adaptive processes are needed to help facilitate rapid switching to different sound sources in the environment. Having multiple representations available to the attentive system would allow for such flexibility, needed in everyday situations to maintain stable auditory percepts, and to allow rapid scanning of interesting events in a busy environment.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory perception; Auditory scene analysis; Mismatch negativity (MMN); Stream segregation; Task-switching

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25281308      PMCID: PMC4495005          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.09.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  30 in total

1.  Perceptual organization of complex auditory sequences: effect of number of simultaneous subsequences and frequency separation.

Authors:  Renaud Brochard; Carolyn Drake; Marie-Claire Botte; Stephen McAdams
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  An investigation of the auditory streaming effect using event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  E Sussman; W Ritter; H G Vaughan
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Effects of location, frequency region, and time course of selective attention on auditory scene analysis.

Authors:  Rhodri Cusack; John Deeks; Genevieve Aikman; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 4.  Processing of complex stimuli and natural scenes in the auditory cortex.

Authors:  Israel Nelken
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Attention affects the organization of auditory input associated with the mismatch negativity system.

Authors:  E Sussman; W Ritter; H G Vaughan
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1998-04-06       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Event-related potential correlates of sound organization: early sensory and late cognitive effects.

Authors:  O Szalárdy; T M Bőhm; A Bendixen; I Winkler
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 3.251

7.  Effects of attention and unilateral neglect on auditory stream segregation.

Authors:  R P Carlyon; R Cusack; J M Foxton; I H Robertson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  The development of the perceptual organization of sound by frequency separation in 5-11-year-old children.

Authors:  E Sussman; R Wong; J Horváth; I Winkler; W Wang
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-01-20       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 9.  Mismatch negativity (MMN) as an index of cognitive dysfunction.

Authors:  Risto Näätänen; Elyse S Sussman; Dean Salisbury; Valerie L Shafer
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 3.020

10.  Attention Matters: Pitch vs. Pattern Processing in Adolescence.

Authors:  Elyse S Sussman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-06-10
View more
  6 in total

1.  Multitasking: Effects of processing multiple auditory feature patterns.

Authors:  Tova Miller; Sufen Chen; Wei Wei Lee; Elyse S Sussman
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Selective entrainment of brain oscillations drives auditory perceptual organization.

Authors:  Jordi Costa-Faidella; Elyse S Sussman; Carles Escera
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 3.  Auditory Scene Analysis: An Attention Perspective.

Authors:  Elyse S Sussman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) gene modulates the influence of informational masking on speech recognition.

Authors:  Zilong Xie; W Todd Maddox; Valerie S Knopik; John E McGeary; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  The Brain Tracks Multiple Predictions About the Auditory Scene.

Authors:  Kelin M Brace; Elyse S Sussman
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  The role of attention and explicit knowledge in perceiving bistable auditory input.

Authors:  Kelin M Brace; Elyse S Sussman
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 4.348

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.