Literature DB >> 15749563

High-speed optical observations of contrast agent destruction.

Ayache Bouakaz1, Michel Versluis, Nico de Jong.   

Abstract

Ultrasound contrast agents are now available since a few years and used for diagnostic purposes. Improved diagnostic decisions have been made possible with new imaging methods that are mainly based on the nonlinear properties of gas microbubbles. Since it is well known that contrast agents are destroyed by ultrasound when the acoustic pressure exceeds a threshold, extremely low acoustic pressures were applied to achieve enhanced contrast image quality. However, destruction of contrast microbubbles is not necessarily undesirable, since it is beneficial in, for example, destruction/reperfusion imaging and recently in drug delivery. We investigate in this experimental study the destruction dynamics of a contrast agent consisting of nitrogen bubbles encapsulated in a double polymer/albumin wall shell. This is accomplished using an ultrafast camera Brandaris that operates at a frame rate of 25 MHz and records 128 frames. The measurements were performed with an ultrasound sine burst of 10 cycles at 1.7 MHz. Different acoustic pressures were applied and various microsphere sizes were examined. The results show three different zones depending on the applied pressure and bubble size: these are nondestruction zone, transient zone and destruction zone. The nondestruction zone is reached for either very small microspheres or low mechanical indices (MI) (<0.3). In the destruction zone lie either large microspheres (5 microm or higher) even when irradiated at low MIs or small microspheres (<5 microm) when the MI is above 0.6. The optical observations revealed that the destruction of the microspheres is characterized by shell rupture and gas release. The release of the gas gives rise to new free microbubble that lasts for a few milliseconds and then disappears due to dissolution. In the transient zone, the microspheres are mainly compressed in the first few cycles but no expansion is induced. After intense compressions, the shell fissures and gas escapes in the last cycles of the burst or during a second burst depending on the initial size and MI. These optical recordings are important to investigate contrast bubble destruction and can help in amplifying or minimizing this process. Indeed, bubble disruption remains the basis of most current sensitive methods for detecting perfusion with contrast agents and is an essential component of perfusion quantification with microbubbles, in addition to drug delivery applications and pressure measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15749563     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2004.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  43 in total

1.  Acoustic characterization of echogenic liposomes: frequency-dependent attenuation and backscatter.

Authors:  Jonathan A Kopechek; Kevin J Haworth; Jason L Raymond; T Douglas Mast; Stephen R Perrin; Melvin E Klegerman; Shaoling Huang; Tyrone M Porter; David D McPherson; Christy K Holland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Improving the sensitivity of high-frequency subharmonic imaging with coded excitation: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Himanshu Shekhar; Marvin M Doyley
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Determination of postexcitation thresholds for single ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles using double passive cavitation detection.

Authors:  Daniel A King; Michael J Malloy; Alayna C Roberts; Alexander Haak; Christian C Yoder; William D O'Brien
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  In vitro methods to study bubble-cell interactions: Fundamentals and therapeutic applications.

Authors:  Guillaume Lajoinie; Ine De Cock; Constantin C Coussios; Ine Lentacker; Séverine Le Gac; Eleanor Stride; Michel Versluis
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.800

5.  Application of ultrasound to selectively localize nanodroplets for targeted imaging and therapy.

Authors:  Paul A Dayton; Shukui Zhao; Susannah H Bloch; Pat Schumann; Kim Penrose; Terry O Matsunaga; Reena Zutshi; Alexander Doinikov; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.488

6.  Excitation of polymer-shelled contrast agents with high-frequency ultrasound.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Ketterling; Jonathan Mamou; John S Allen; Orlando Aristizábal; Rene G Williamson; Daniel H Turnbull
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Ultrasonic contrast agent shell rupture detected by inertial cavitation and rebound signals.

Authors:  Azzdine Y Ammi; Robin O Cleveland; Jonathan Mamou; Grace I Wang; S Lori Bridal; William D O'Brien
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.725

8.  Needle size and injection rate impact microbubble contrast agent population.

Authors:  Esra Talu; Robert L Powell; Marjorie L Longo; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  On the relationship between microbubble fragmentation, deflation and broadband superharmonic signal production.

Authors:  Brooks D Lindsey; Juan D Rojas; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Ultrasound-triggered release of recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator from echogenic liposomes.

Authors:  Denise A B Smith; Sampada S Vaidya; Jonathan A Kopechek; Shao-Ling Huang; Melvin E Klegerman; David D McPherson; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.998

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.