Literature DB >> 17297793

The effect of fundamental frequency on the brightness dimension of timbre.

Jeremy Marozeau1, Alain de Cheveigné.   

Abstract

The dependency of the brightness dimension of timbre on fundamental frequency (FO) was examined experimentally. Subjects compared the timbres of 24 synthetic stimuli, produced by the combination of six values of spectral centroid to obtain different values of expected brightness, and four FO's, ranging over 18 semitones. Subjects were instructed to ignore pitch differences. Dissimilarity scores were analyzed by both ANOVA and multidimensional scaling (MDS). Results show that timbres can be compared between stimuli with different FO's over the range tested, and that differences in FO affect timbre dissimilarity in two ways. First, dissimilarity scores reveal a term proportional to FO difference that shows up in the MDS solution as a dimension correlated with FO and orthogonal to other timbre dimensions. Second, FO affects systematically the timbre dimension (brightness) correlated with spectral centroid. Interestingly, both terms covaried with differences in FO rather than chroma or consonance. The first term probably corresponds to pitch. The second can be eliminated if the formula for spectral centroid is modified by introducing a corrective factor dependent on FO.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17297793     DOI: 10.1121/1.2384910

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

1.  Cortical Correlates of Attention to Auditory Features.

Authors:  Emily J Allen; Philip C Burton; Juraj Mesik; Cheryl A Olman; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Symmetric interactions and interference between pitch and timbre.

Authors:  Emily J Allen; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Temporal and spectral cues for musical timbre perception in electric hearing.

Authors:  Ying-Yee Kong; Ala Mullangi; Jeremy Marozeau; Michael Epstein
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Representations of Pitch and Timbre Variation in Human Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Emily J Allen; Philip C Burton; Cheryl A Olman; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Short- and long-term memory for pitch and non-pitch contours: Insights from congenital amusia.

Authors:  Jackson E Graves; Agathe Pralus; Lesly Fornoni; Andrew J Oxenham; Anne Caclin; Barbara Tillmann
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Four Distinctions for the Auditory "Wastebasket" of Timbre.

Authors:  Kai Siedenburg; Stephen McAdams
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-10-04

7.  Pitch and timbre interfere when both are parametrically varied.

Authors:  Valeria C Caruso; Evan Balaban
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  What is a melody? On the relationship between pitch and brightness of timbre.

Authors:  Marion Cousineau; Samuele Carcagno; Laurent Demany; Daniel Pressnitzer
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-17

9.  Music and Speech Perception in Children Using Sung Speech.

Authors:  Yingjiu Nie; John J Galvin; Michael Morikawa; Victoria André; Harley Wheeler; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  A Theory of Instrument-Specific Absolute Pitch.

Authors:  Lindsey Reymore; Niels Chr Hansen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-10-22
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.