Literature DB >> 17287918

Telerobotic gastrointestinal surgery: phase 2--safety and efficacy.

G H Ballantyne1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Federal Drug Administration (FDA) approved the da Vinci surgical system for all abdominal operations in July 2000. In the past 6 years, virtually all gastrointestinal operations have been accomplished using telerobotic techniques. The purpose of this review is to summarize the short-term outcomes achieved with telerobotic gastrointestinal operations.
METHODS: All case series of telerobotic gastrointestinal operations identified by PubMed searches are included in this review.
RESULTS: Case series document the safety and efficacy of telerobotic cholecystectomy, fundoplication, Heller myotomy, gastric bypass, colectomy, gastrectomy, and pancreatectomy. The procedures were accomplished with low rates of conversion to laparoscopic operations, mortality, and morbidity. When comparison groups were available, the analysis shows that telerobotic operations required more time than the laparoscopic operations, although for telerobotic cholecystectomy and telerobotic fundoplication, this difference disappeared in 10 to 20 operations. Specific patient advantages were not identified for telerobotic operations compared with laparoscopic operations, except for a decreased esophageal perforation rate during telerobotic Heller myotomy. Surgeons benefited from the three-dimensional imaging, the handlike motions of the robotic instruments, and an ergonomically comfortable position.
CONCLUSION: All telerobotic gastrointestinal operations are feasible and can be performed with safety and efficacy. It is difficult to demonstrate patient-specific advantages of telerobotic surgery over laparoscopic operations. Nonetheless, telerobotic surgical systems offer distinct advantages to surgeons and may facilitate an increase in the number of surgeons performing advanced laparoscopic gastrointestinal operations. In addition, telerobotics offer a digital information platform that enables surgical simulation and augmented-reality surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17287918     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-006-9130-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   3.453


  76 in total

1.  A competency-based virtual reality training curriculum for the acquisition of laparoscopic psychomotor skill.

Authors:  Rajesh Aggarwal; Teodor Grantcharov; Krishna Moorthy; Julian Hance; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Computer-assisted laparoscopic repair of "upside-down" stomach with the Da Vinci system.

Authors:  Chris Braumann; Charalambos Menenakos; Jens C Rueckert; Joachim M Mueller; Christoph A Jacobi
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.719

3.  Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy: our experience on 29 patients.

Authors:  Ezio Caratozzolo; Alfonso Recordare; Marco Massani; Luca Bonariol; Alessandro Jelmoni; Michele Antoniutti; Nicolò Bassi
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2005

Review 4.  Robotics in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  J Hance; T Rockall; A Darzi
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 2.588

5.  A human factors analysis of technical and team skills among surgical trainees during procedural simulations in a simulated operating theatre.

Authors:  Krishna Moorthy; Yaron Munz; Sally Adams; Vikas Pandey; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Transcontinental robot-assisted remote telesurgery: feasibility and potential applications.

Authors:  Jacques Marescaux; Joel Leroy; Francesco Rubino; Michelle Smith; Michel Vix; Michele Simone; Didier Mutter
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  A comprehensive review of anti-reflux procedures completed by computer-assisted tele-surgery.

Authors:  A R Aurora; M A Talamini
Journal:  Minerva Chir       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial posterior fundoplication with the DaVinci system: initial experiences and technical aspects.

Authors:  H Wykypiel; G J Wetscher; A Klaus; T Schmid; M Gadenstaetter; J Bodner; E Bodner
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2003-01-30       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Advantages and limits of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: preliminary experience.

Authors:  F Corcione; C Esposito; D Cuccurullo; A Settembre; N Miranda; F Amato; F Pirozzi; P Caiazzo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-11-18       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Use of robotics during laparoscopic gastric bypass for morbid obesity.

Authors:  Dominick Artuso; Michael Wayne; Robert Grossi
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2005 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  19 in total

1.  Robot-assisted endoscopic surgery for thyroid cancer: experience with the first 100 patients.

Authors:  Sang-Wook Kang; Jong Ju Jeong; Ji-Sup Yun; Tae Yon Sung; Seung Chul Lee; Yong Sang Lee; Kee-Hyun Nam; Hang Seok Chang; Woong Youn Chung; Cheong Soo Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  State of the art of robotic pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Luca Milone; Despoina Daskalaki; Xiaoying Wang; Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons (EAES) consensus statement on the use of robotics in general surgery.

Authors:  Amir Szold; Roberto Bergamaschi; Ivo Broeders; Jenny Dankelman; Antonello Forgione; Thomas Langø; Andreas Melzer; Yoav Mintz; Salvador Morales-Conde; Michael Rhodes; Richard Satava; Chung-Ngai Tang; Ramon Vilallonga
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  SAGES TAVAC safety and effectiveness analysis: da Vinci ® Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA).

Authors:  Shawn Tsuda; Dmitry Oleynikov; Jon Gould; Dan Azagury; Bryan Sandler; Matthew Hutter; Sharona Ross; Eric Haas; Fred Brody; Richard Satava
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Robotic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymph node dissection during total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Kun Yang; Minah Cho; Chul Kyu Roh; Won Jun Seo; Seohee Choi; Taeil Son; Hyoung-Il Kim; Woo Jin Hyung
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Robot-assisted spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: a single surgeon's experiences and proposal of clinical application.

Authors:  Ho Kyoung Hwang; Chang Moo Kang; Young Eun Chung; Kyung Ah Kim; Sung Hoon Choi; Woo Jung Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Robotic-assisted spleen preserving distal pancreatectomy: a technical review.

Authors:  Yen-Yi Juo; Jonathan C King
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-10-10

8.  Current status of robot-assisted gastric surgery.

Authors:  Se-Jin Baek; Dong-Woo Lee; Sung-Soo Park; Seon-Hahn Kim
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2011-10-15

9.  Conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted spleen-preserving pancreatectomy: does da Vinci have clinical advantages?

Authors:  Chang Moo Kang; Dong Hyun Kim; Woo Jung Lee; Hoon Sang Chi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic total and partial gastric resection with D2 lymph node dissection for adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Alberto Patriti; Graziano Ceccarelli; Raffaele Bellochi; Alberto Bartoli; Alessandro Spaziani; Lelio Di Zitti; Luciano Casciola
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.