Literature DB >> 23052527

Robot-assisted spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: a single surgeon's experiences and proposal of clinical application.

Ho Kyoung Hwang1, Chang Moo Kang, Young Eun Chung, Kyung Ah Kim, Sung Hoon Choi, Woo Jung Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Advanced and delicate laparoscopic techniques are usually required for safe and successful laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy. The unique characteristics of robotic surgical system are thought to be useful for this minimally invasive procedure.
METHODS: From September 2007 to May 2011, patients who underwent robot-assisted, spleen-preserving, distal pancreatectomy for benign and borderline malignant tumors of the pancreas were retrospectively reviewed. Perioperative clinicopathologic surgical outcomes were evaluated.
RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were attempted for robot-assisted, spleen-preserving, distal pancreatectomy, and in 21 patients (95.5 %), the spleen was saved either by splenic vessels conservation (SVC; n = 17, 81 %) or by splenic vessels sacrifice (SVS; n = 4, 19 %). Seven patients were male and 15 were female with a mean age of 43.2 ± 15.2 years. Pathologic diagnosis included MCT in five patients, SCT in five, SPT in four, IPMT in three, NET in three, and other benign conditions in two. The mean operation time was 398.9 ± 166.3 min, but it gradually decreased as experiences were accumulated (Rsq = 0.223, p = 0.023). Intraoperative blood loss was 361.3 ± 360.1 ml, and intraoperative transfusion was required in four patients (18.1 %). A soft diet was given for 1.2 ± 0.4 days, and the length of hospital stay was 7.0 ± 2.4 days postoperatively. Clinically relevant pancreatic fistula was noted in two patients (9.1 %) but was successfully managed conservatively. Most patients (87.5 %) showed patency in conserved both splenic vessels, and only two patients (12.5 %) had partially or completely obliterated in splenic veins in the SVC-SpDP group. Partially impaired splenic perfusion was observed in one patient in the SVS-SpDP group. The perfusion defect area decreased without any clinical symptom after 4 months.
CONCLUSIONS: The robotic surgical system is thought to be beneficial for improving the spleen-preservation rate in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Robot-assisted approach can be chosen for patients who require spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23052527     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2551-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  37 in total

1.  Risk of varices bleeding after spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with excision of splenic artery and vein.

Authors:  Yu-Wen Tien; Kao-Lang Liu; Rey-Heng Hu; Hsiu-Po Wang; King-Jen Chang; Po-Huang Lee
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Robot-assisted gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: lessons learned from an initial 100 consecutive procedures.

Authors:  Jyewon Song; Sung Jin Oh; Wook Ho Kang; Woo Jin Hyung; Seung Ho Choi; Sung Hoon Noh
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Major venous resection during total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Michael L Kendrick; Guido M Sclabas
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: feasibility and safety of robotic assistance in the prone position.

Authors:  Dae Joon Kim; Woo Jin Hyung; Chang Young Lee; Jin-Gu Lee; Seok Jin Haam; In-Kyu Park; Kyung Young Chung
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Initial experiences using robot-assisted central pancreatectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy: a potential way to advanced laparoscopic pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Chang Moo Kang; Dong Hyun Kim; Woo Jung Lee; Hoon Sang Chi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-09-11       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Single-center experience of laparoscopic left pancreatic resection in 359 consecutive patients: changing the surgical paradigm of left pancreatic resection.

Authors:  Ki Byung Song; Song Cheol Kim; Jae Berm Park; Young Hoon Kim; Young Soo Jung; Myung-Hwan Kim; Sung-Koo Lee; Dong-Wan Seo; Sang Soo Lee; Do Hyun Park; Duck Jong Han
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Can laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy be safely implemented?

Authors:  Amer H Zureikat; Jason A Breaux; Jennifer L Steel; Steven J Hughes
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 8.  Long-term complications of laparotomy in Hodgkin's disease.

Authors:  M Jockovich; N P Mendenhall; M D Sombeck; J L Talbert; E M Copeland; K I Bland
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: results on a consecutive series of 58 patients.

Authors:  Gianluigi Melotti; Giovanni Butturini; Micaela Piccoli; Luca Casetti; Claudio Bassi; Barbara Mullineris; Maria Grazia Lazzaretti; Paolo Pederzoli
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Revisiting vascular patency after spleen-preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with conservation of splenic vessels.

Authors:  Ho Kyoung Hwang; Young Eun Chung; Kyoung Ah Kim; Chang Moo Kang; Woo Jung Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for benign and malignant pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Bin Huang; Lu Feng; Jichun Zhao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  State of the art of robotic pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Luca Milone; Despoina Daskalaki; Xiaoying Wang; Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Laparoscopic resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: dream or reality?

Authors:  Blaire Anderson; Shahzeer Karmali
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Short-term and long-term outcomes after robot-assisted versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs): a multicenter comparative study.

Authors:  Sergio Alfieri; Giovanni Butturini; Ugo Boggi; Andrea Pietrabissa; Luca Morelli; Fabio Vistoli; Isacco Damoli; Andrea Peri; Claudio Fiorillo; Luigi Pugliese; Marco Ramera; Nelide De Lio; Gregorio Di Franco; Alessandro Esposito; Luca Landoni; Fausto Rosa; Roberta Menghi; Giovanni Battista Doglietto; Giuseppe Quero
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 5.  International consensus statement on robotic pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Rong Liu; Go Wakabayashi; Chinnusamy Palanivelu; Allan Tsung; Kehu Yang; Brian K P Goh; Charing Ching-Ning Chong; Chang Moo Kang; Chenghong Peng; Eli Kakiashvili; Ho-Seong Han; Hong-Jin Kim; Jin He; Jae Hoon Lee; Kyoichi Takaori; Marco Vito Marino; Shen-Nien Wang; Tiankang Guo; Thilo Hackert; Ting-Shuo Huang; Yiengpruksawan Anusak; Yuman Fong; Yuichi Nagakawa; Yi-Ming Shyr; Yao-Ming Wu; Yupei Zhao
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 6.  Robotic-assisted spleen preserving distal pancreatectomy: a technical review.

Authors:  Yen-Yi Juo; Jonathan C King
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-10-10

Review 7.  Minimally invasive surgical approach to pancreatic malignancies.

Authors:  Lapo Bencini; Mario Annecchiarico; Marco Farsi; Ilenia Bartolini; Vita Mirasolo; Francesco Guerra; Andrea Coratti
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-12-15

8.  Spleen-Preserving Versus Spleen-Sacrificing Distal Pancreatectomy in Laparoscopy and Open Method-Perioperative Outcome Analysis-14 Years Experience.

Authors:  Nilanjan Panda; Nitin Kumar Bansal; Mohan Narsimhan; Ramesh Ardhanari; Joseph Raja B Bronson
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 0.656

9.  A prospective non-randomised single-center study comparing laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Giovanni Butturini; Isacco Damoli; Lorenzo Crepaz; Giuseppe Malleo; Giovanni Marchegiani; Despoina Daskalaki; Alessandro Esposito; Sara Cingarlini; Roberto Salvia; Claudio Bassi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  The efficacy of spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with or without splenic vessel preservation: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yu Tang; Shanhong Tang; Sanyuan Hu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-10-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.