Literature DB >> 27067594

Agreement between personally generated areas of quality of life concern and standard outcome measures in people with advanced cancer.

Ala' S Aburub1, B Gagnon2, A M Rodríguez3, Nancy E Mayo4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: People with advanced cancer experience different sequelae which have unique effects on quality of life (QOL). The patient-generated index (PGI) is a personalized measure that allows patients to nominate, rate, and value areas that have the most impact on QOL. Fatigue, pain, and aspects of physical function are among the top 10 areas with QOL impact. An area of validation that is lacking for the PGI is the extent to which spontaneously nominated areas of QOL that patients are concerned with, agree with ratings obtained from standard patient reported outcomes (PROs).
METHODS: Data from 192 patients were used to compare ratings on fatigue, pain, and physical function obtained from PGI to those from standard outcome measures.
RESULTS: Within one severity rating, agreement ranged from 32.1 to 76.9 % within the fatigue domain, 34.2 to 95.24 % for pain, and between 84.2 and 94.7 % for physical function. Of the 10 items where the PGI had the highest agreement, 7 came from the RAND-36. At the domain level, people nominating an area scored in the more impaired range on standard measures than people who did not.
CONCLUSION: PGI gives comparable information as do standard measures. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER: PGI provides important information to guide clinical care of the patient and also produces a legitimate total score suitable for research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advanced cancer; Patient-generated index; Patient-reported outcomes; Personalized measure; Psychometric properties; Quality of life; Validity

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27067594     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-016-3204-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  41 in total

Review 1.  Physical activity and cancer prevention: etiologic evidence and biological mechanisms.

Authors:  Christine M Friedenreich; Marla R Orenstein
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.798

2.  A theory-based method for the evaluation of individual quality of life: the SEIQoL.

Authors:  C R B Joyce; A Hickey; H M McGee; C A O'Boyle
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Can a "prompt list" empower cancer patients to ask relevant questions?

Authors:  Aneta Dimoska; Martin H N Tattersall; Phyllis N Butow; Heather Shepherd; Paul Kinnersley
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  Food, nutrition, physical activity and cancer prevention. Authoritative report from World Cancer Research Fund provides global update.

Authors:  A J McMichael
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2008-05-08       Impact factor: 4.022

5.  Validity of the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire in the palliative care setting: a multi-centre Canadian study demonstrating the importance of the existential domain.

Authors:  S R Cohen; B M Mount; E Bruera; M Provost; J Rowe; K Tong
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.762

6.  The rationale, design, and implementation of the American Cancer Society's studies of cancer survivors.

Authors:  Tenbroeck Smith; Kevin D Stein; C Christina Mehta; Chiewkwei Kaw; James L Kepner; Trent Buskirk; Jeremy Stafford; Frank Baker
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Medical Oncology Patients: Are They Offered Help and Does It Provide Relief?

Authors:  Alison Zucca; Rob Sanson-Fisher; Amy Waller; Mariko Carey; Elizabeth Fradgley; Tim Regan
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 3.612

8.  Living with cancer: "good" days and "bad" days--what produces them? Can the McGill quality of life questionnaire distinguish between them?

Authors:  S R Cohen; B M Mount
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 9.  Management of cancer-related fatigue.

Authors:  Gary R Morrow; Abhay R Shelke; Joseph A Roscoe; Jane T Hickok; Karen Mustian
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.176

10.  Cancer rehabilitation: assessment of need, development, and evaluation of a model of care.

Authors:  J F Lehmann; J A DeLisa; C G Warren; B J deLateur; P L Bryant; C G Nicholson
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 3.966

View more
  1 in total

1.  Validation of an Individualized Measure of Quality of Life, Patient Generated Index, for Use with People with Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Ayse Kuspinar; Kedar K V Mate; Anne-Louise Lafontaine; Nancy Mayo
Journal:  Neurol Res Int       Date:  2020-03-30
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.