Literature DB >> 2404483

Methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis. Impact on quality of life assessed by traditional standard-item and individualized patient preference health status questionnaires.

P Tugwell1, C Bombardier, W W Buchanan, C Goldsmith, E Grace, K J Bennett, H J Williams, M Egger, G S Alarcon, M Guttadauria.   

Abstract

In a double-blind, randomized trial of methotrexate vs placebo in rheumatoid arthritis, the effect of treatment on physical, social, and emotional function was measured in two different ways: the same, standard measurements in all patients, and individualized measurements selected by the patients at the start of the trial as representing the functions they most wanted to have improved by treatment. On the standard measurements, methotrexate-treated patients fared better than placebo-treated patients in their physical, social, and emotional function by 11%, 5%, and 6%, respectively, results that, although statistically significant, were small. However, methotrexate-treated patients were 29% better in the individualized measures, a result that was both highly statistically significant and greater than the differences in the standard measurements or in joint counts, grip strength, proximal interphalangeal joint circumference, morning stiffness, or walking time. Because the individualized measurements were as efficient as the best direct joint examination measures, yet reflected functional outcomes of greatest importance to individual patients, they constitute useful measures for such trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2404483     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.150.1.59

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  33 in total

Review 1.  Subjective outcome measurement--a primer.

Authors:  M P Tully; J A Cantrill
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1999-06

2.  Reassessing quality-of-life instruments in the evaluation of new drugs.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; R J Jaeschke
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Quality of life measures in health care. I: Applications and issues in assessment.

Authors:  R Fitzpatrick; A Fletcher; S Gore; D Jones; D Spiegelhalter; D Cox
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-10-31

4.  A pragmatic defence of health status measures.

Authors:  R Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  1996-11

5.  Insights and limitations from health-related quality-of-life research.

Authors:  G Guyatt
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 6.  Assessment of quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis: methods and implications.

Authors:  P Bendtsen; I Akerlind; J O Hörnquist
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  The costs of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  S H Allaire; M J Prashker; R F Meenan
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Effects of total hip replacement on quality of life in patients with osteoarthritis and in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  M Borstlap; J L Zant; M Van Soesbergen; J K Van der Korst
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.980

9.  Evaluation of response to methotrexate by a functional index in juvenile chronic arthritis.

Authors:  A Ravelli; S Viola; B Ramenghi; G Di Fuccia; N Ruperto; L Zonta; A Martini
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.980

10.  Components of health: an analysis in rheumatoid arthritis using quality of life questionnaires and clinical and laboratory variables.

Authors:  M Borstlap; M van de Laar; J Zant; J van der Korst
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 19.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.