Literature DB >> 17267863

ACOG Committee Opinion No. 360: Sex selection.

.   

Abstract

In this Committee Opinion, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Ethics presents various ethical considerations and arguments relevant to both prefertilization and postfertilization techniques for sex selection. The principal medical reason for sex selection is known or suspected risk of sex-linked genetic disorders. Other reasons sex selection is requested are personal, social, or cultural in nature. The Committee on Ethics supports the practice of offering patients procedures for the purpose of preventing serious sex-linked genetic diseases. However, the committee opposes meeting requests for sex selection for personal and family reasons, including family balancing, because of the concern that such requests may ultimately support sexist practices. Because a patient is entitled to obtain personal medical information, including information about the sex of her fetus, it will sometimes be impossible for health care professionals to avoid unwitting participation in sex selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17267863     DOI: 10.1097/00006250-200702000-00063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  14 in total

1.  Sex ratio patterns according to Asian ethnicity in Québec, 1981-2004.

Authors:  Nathalie Auger; Mark Daniel; Spencer Moore
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-12-25       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Prenatal testing for Down syndrome: comparison of screening practices in the UK and USA.

Authors:  Dagmar Tapon
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Sex selection for non-medical indications: a survey of current pre-implantation genetic screening practices among U.S. ART clinics.

Authors:  Sarah M Capelouto; Sydney R Archer; Jerrine R Morris; Jennifer F Kawwass; Heather S Hipp
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Cell-free fetal DNA testing: a pilot study of obstetric healthcare provider attitudes toward clinical implementation.

Authors:  Lauren C Sayres; Megan Allyse; Mary E Norton; Mildred K Cho
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.050

5.  Sex ratios at birth after induced abortion.

Authors:  Marcelo L Urquia; Rahim Moineddin; Prabhat Jha; Patricia J O'Campo; Kwame McKenzie; Richard H Glazier; David A Henry; Joel G Ray
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 6.  Conceptualizing couples' decision making in PGD: emerging cognitive, emotional, and moral dimensions.

Authors:  Patricia E Hershberger; Penny F Pierce
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-01-08

Review 7.  Regulating Preimplantation Genetic Testing across the World: A Comparison of International Policy and Ethical Perspectives.

Authors:  Margaret E C Ginoza; Rosario Isasi
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 6.915

8.  Pregnancy Centers: A Clear Purpose of Medicine with Coherent Ethics.

Authors:  Christopher Lisanti; Sandy Christiansen
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2020-05-12

9.  Ethical attitudes of German specialists in reproductive medicine and legal regulation of preimplantation sex selection in Germany.

Authors:  Miriam Wilhelm; Edgar Dahl; Henry Alexander; Elmar Brähler; Yve Stöbel-Richter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Pre-Implantation Gender Selection: Family Balancing in Jordan.

Authors:  Amer Mahmoud Sindiani; Faheem Zayed; Eman Hussein Alshdaifat; Hasan M Rawashdeh; Wesam Al-Woshah; Nada Zayed
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-07-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.