Literature DB >> 32699443

Pregnancy Centers: A Clear Purpose of Medicine with Coherent Ethics.

Christopher Lisanti1,2,3, Sandy Christiansen4,5.   

Abstract

What is the purpose of medicine? This fundamental question is at the heart of the criticisms faced by pregnancy centers (PCs) and accusations that they are unethical. PCs maintain that the purpose of medicine is to treat and prevent disease. Because pregnancy is not a disease, PCs do not advocate for elective abortion or contraceptives. PCs view the function of values (e.g., autonomy) as constraints upon physicians that prevent physical and ethical harms. Their critics either embrace an ill-defined purpose of medicine such as promoting well-being or conflate the value of autonomy with medicine's purpose. This leads to a subjective view of medicine and changes the relationship from physician-patient to vendor-customer. This subjective nature along with its attendant vendor-customer relationship cannot solve for current or future ethical problems such as sex-selective abortion and its fatal discrimination against females.
SUMMARY: Pregnancy Centers embrace a traditional "treat and prevent disease" purpose of medicine.  This clear and objective purpose logically leads to not advocating for abortion or contraceptives.  The authors outline a coherent ethical structure outlining the role values play in regards to this purpose. This is contrasted with the current ill-defined purpose within medicine today that has led to an inconsistent change of the physician-patient relationship to a vendor-customer one, ethical incoherence, and several attendant harms, most notably sex-selective abortion. © Catholic Medical Association 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abortion; Autonomy; Bioethics; Consumer-directed care; Ethics; Philosophy of medicine

Year:  2020        PMID: 32699443      PMCID: PMC7350117          DOI: 10.1177/0024363920920397

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Linacre Q        ISSN: 0024-3639


  27 in total

1.  Reflections of the Hippocratic Oath in modern medicine.

Authors:  Stavros A Antoniou; George A Antoniou; Frank A Granderath; Anna Mavroforou; Athanasios D Giannoukas; Athanasios I Antoniou
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  ACOG Committee Opinion No. 385 November 2007: the limits of conscientious refusal in reproductive medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  At "Crisis Pregnancy Centers," Critics Say, Ideology Trumps Evidence.

Authors:  Rita Rubin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?

Authors:  Alberto Giubilini; Francesca Minerva
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Trends in selective abortions of girls in India: analysis of nationally representative birth histories from 1990 to 2005 and census data from 1991 to 2011.

Authors:  Prabhat Jha; Maya A Kesler; Rajesh Kumar; Faujdar Ram; Usha Ram; Lukasz Aleksandrowicz; Diego G Bassani; Shailaja Chandra; Jayant K Banthia
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Abnormal sex ratios in human populations: causes and consequences.

Authors:  Therese Hesketh; Zhu Wei Xing
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-08-28       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Self-perceptions from people with Down syndrome.

Authors:  Brian G Skotko; Susan P Levine; Richard Goldstein
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 2.802

8.  The profession of medicine.

Authors:  K Calman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-10-29

9.  Informed consent or institutionalized eugenics? How the medical profession encourages abortion of fetuses with Down syndrome.

Authors:  Darrin P Dixon
Journal:  Issues Law Med       Date:  2008

10.  Falling sex ratios and emerging evidence of sex-selective abortion in Nepal: evidence from nationally representative survey data.

Authors:  Melanie Dawn Frost; Mahesh Puri; Peter Richard Andrew Hinde
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.