Literature DB >> 27067818

Sex ratios at birth after induced abortion.

Marcelo L Urquia1, Rahim Moineddin2, Prabhat Jha2, Patricia J O'Campo2, Kwame McKenzie2, Richard H Glazier2, David A Henry2, Joel G Ray2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Skewed male:female ratios at birth have been observed among certain immigrant groups. Data on abortion practices that might help to explain these findings are lacking.
METHODS: We examined 1 220 933 births to women with up to 3 consecutive singleton live births between 1993 and 2012 in Ontario. Records of live births, and induced and spontaneous abortions were linked to Canadian immigration records. We determined associations of male:female infant ratios with maternal birthplace, sex of the previous living sibling(s) and prior spontaneous or induced abortions.
RESULTS: Male:female infant ratios did not appreciably depart from the normal range among Canadian-born women and most women born outside of Canada, irrespective of the sex of previous children or the characteristics of prior abortions. However, among infants of women who immigrated from India and had previously given birth to 2 girls, the overall male:female ratio was 1.96 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.75-2.21) for the third live birth. The male:female infant ratio after 2 girls was 1.77 (95% CI 1.26-2.47) times higher if the current birth was preceded by 1 induced abortion, 2.38 (95% CI 1.44-3.94) times higher if preceded by 2 or more induced abortions and 3.88 (95% CI 2.02-7.50) times higher if the induced abortion was performed at 15 weeks or more gestation relative to no preceding abortion. Spontaneous abortions were not associated with male-biased sex ratios in subsequent births.
INTERPRETATION: High male:female ratios observed among infants born to women who immigrated from India are associated with induced abortions, especially in the second trimester of pregnancy.
© 2016 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27067818      PMCID: PMC4902709          DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.151074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  33 in total

1.  First-trimester determination of fetal gender by ultrasound.

Authors:  Z Efrat; O O Akinfenwa; K H Nicolaides
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 7.299

2.  Missing women--revisited.

Authors:  Amartya Sen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-12-06

3.  Missing women.

Authors:  A Sen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-03-07

4.  Son-biased sex ratios in the 2000 United States Census.

Authors:  Douglas Almond; Lena Edlund
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-03-31       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Abnormal sex ratios in human populations: causes and consequences.

Authors:  Therese Hesketh; Zhu Wei Xing
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-08-28       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Low female[corrected]-to-male [corrected] sex ratio of children born in India: national survey of 1.1 million households.

Authors:  Prabhat Jha; Rajesh Kumar; Priya Vasa; Neeraj Dhingra; Deva Thiruchelvam; Rahim Moineddin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-01-21       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  ACOG Committee Opinion No. 360: Sex selection.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Natural variation in the human sex ratio.

Authors:  R Jacobsen; H Møller; A Mouritsen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Abortion patterns and reported sex ratios at birth in rural Yunnan, China.

Authors:  Petra Löfstedt; Luo Shusheng; Annika Johansson
Journal:  Reprod Health Matters       Date:  2004-11

10.  Fertility and son preference in Korea.

Authors:  U Larsen; W Chung; M Das Gupta
Journal:  Popul Stud (Camb)       Date:  1998-11
View more
  12 in total

1.  Variations in male-female infant ratios among births to Canadian- and Indian-born mothers, 1990-2011: a population-based register study.

Authors:  Marcelo L Urquia; Joel G Ray; Susitha Wanigaratne; Rahim Moineddin; Patricia J O'Campo
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2016-03-31

2.  Are we consistent?

Authors:  John Loge
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Male-biased infant sex ratios and patterns of induced abortion.

Authors:  Abdool S Yasseen; Thierry Lacaze-Masmonteil
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Intergenerational abortion tendency between mothers and teenage daughters: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Ning Liu; M Michèle Farrugia; Simone N Vigod; Marcelo L Urquia; Joel G Ray
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Male-biased sex ratios in Australian migrant populations: a population-based study of 1 191 250 births 1999-2015.

Authors:  Kristina Edvardsson; Anna Axmon; Rhonda Powell; Mary-Ann Davey
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 7.196

6.  Sex ratios at birth among second-generation mothers of South Asian ethnicity in Ontario, Canada: a retrospective population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Susitha Wanigaratne; Pamela Uppal; Manvir Bhangoo; Alia Januwalla; Deepa Singal; Marcelo L Urquia
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Sex ratios at birth in Australia according to mother's country of birth: A national study of all 5 614 847 reported live births 1997-2016.

Authors:  Kristina Edvardsson; Mary-Ann Davey; Rhonda Powell; Anna Axmon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Receipt of routine preventive care among infant daughters and sons of immigrant mothers in Ontario, Canada: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ariel Pulver; Astrid Guttmann; Joel G Ray; Patricia J O'Campo; Marcelo L Urquia
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Determinants of imbalanced sex ratio at birth in Nepal: evidence from secondary analysis of a large hospital-based study and nationally-representative survey data.

Authors:  Elina Pradhan; Erin Pearson; Mahesh Puri; Manju Maharjan; Dev Chandra Maharjan; Iqbal Shah
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 10.  Sex selection and non-invasive prenatal testing: A review of current practices, evidence, and ethical issues.

Authors:  Hilary Bowman-Smart; Julian Savulescu; Christopher Gyngell; Cara Mand; Martin B Delatycki
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 3.050

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.