Literature DB >> 17238356

Analyzing the effect of data quality on the accuracy of clinical decision support systems: a computer simulation approach.

Sharique Hasan1, Rema Padman.   

Abstract

Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) use data from a variety sources to provide guidance to physicians at the point of care. However, several studies have shown that data from these registries often can not be trusted to be accurate or complete. For instance, studies show that accuracy and completeness in medical registries may be as low as 67% and 30.7%, respectively. Consequently, since CDSS rely on this data for generating guidance, the possibility that the medical decisions facilitated by the system may result in negative patient outcomes still exists. To analyze the extent of this problem, we present a two-pronged approach using simulation, followed by regression in order to quantify the relative impact of poor data quality on overall CDSS accuracy. The results from this analysis can be beneficial to developers and hospitals who can use the results to inform the development of procedures for minimizing incorrect medical decisions facilitated by these systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17238356      PMCID: PMC1839724     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  10 in total

1.  A design model for computer-based guideline implementation based on information management services.

Authors:  R N Shiffman; C A Brandt; Y Liaw; G J Corb
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Clinical decision support systems for the practice of evidence-based medicine.

Authors:  I Sim; P Gorman; R A Greenes; R B Haynes; B Kaplan; H Lehmann; P C Tang
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 3.  Defining and improving data quality in medical registries: a literature review, case study, and generic framework.

Authors:  Danielle G T Arts; Nicolette F De Keizer; Gert-Jan Scheffer
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  D L Hunt; R B Haynes; S E Hanna; K Smith
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-10-21       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Accuracy of data in computer-based patient records.

Authors:  W R Hogan; M M Wagner
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  The accuracy of medication data in an outpatient electronic medical record.

Authors:  M M Wagner; W R Hogan
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Exploring the degree of concordance of coded and textual data in answering clinical queries from a clinical data repository.

Authors:  H D Stein; P Nadkarni; J Erdos; P L Miller
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Assessing the quality of clinical data in a computer-based record for calculating the pneumonia severity index.

Authors:  D Aronsky; P J Haug
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Characteristics of outpatient clinical decision support systems: a taxonomic description.

Authors:  Amy Berlin; Marco Sorani; Ida Sim
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2004

10.  Comparing computer-interpretable guideline models: a case-study approach.

Authors:  Mor Peleg; Samson Tu; Jonathan Bury; Paolo Ciccarese; John Fox; Robert A Greenes; Richard Hall; Peter D Johnson; Neill Jones; Anand Kumar; Silvia Miksch; Silvana Quaglini; Andreas Seyfang; Edward H Shortliffe; Mario Stefanelli
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

  10 in total
  23 in total

1.  Electronic laboratory data quality and the value of a health information exchange to support public health reporting processes.

Authors:  Brian E Dixon; Julie J McGowan; Shaun J Grannis
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2011-10-22

2.  Electronic health information quality challenges and interventions to improve public health surveillance data and practice.

Authors:  Brian E Dixon; Jason A Siegel; Tanya V Oemig; Shaun J Grannis
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Analysis of Anesthesia Screens for Rule-Based Data Quality Assessment Opportunities.

Authors:  Zhan Wang; Melody Penning; Meredith Zozus
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2019

4.  Improving Clinical Data Integrity by using Data Adjudication Techniques for Data Received through a Health Information Exchange (HIE).

Authors:  Pallavi Ranade-Kharkar; Susan E Pollock; Darren K Mann; Sidney N Thornton
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2014-11-14

5.  Defining and Developing a Generic Framework for Monitoring Data Quality in Clinical Research.

Authors:  Miss Lauren Houston; A/Prof Ping Yu; Dr Allison Martin; Dr Yasmine Probst
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-12-05

6.  Clinician perspectives on the quality of patient data used for clinical decision support: a qualitative study.

Authors:  James L McCormack; Joan S Ash
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2012-11-03

7.  Need of informatics in designing interoperable clinical registries.

Authors:  Majid Rastegar-Mojarad; Sunghwan Sohn; Liwei Wang; Feichen Shen; Troy C Bleeker; William A Cliby; Hongfang Liu
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 4.046

8.  Quantifying the Effect of Data Quality on the Validity of an eMeasure.

Authors:  Steven G Johnson; Stuart Speedie; Gyorgy Simon; Vipin Kumar; Bonnie L Westra
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 9.  Tensions and paradoxes in electronic patient record research: a systematic literature review using the meta-narrative method.

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh; Henry W W Potts; Geoff Wong; Pippa Bark; Deborah Swinglehurst
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.911

10.  An Ontology for Telemedicine Systems Resiliency to Technological Context Variations in Pervasive Healthcare.

Authors:  Nekane Larburu; Richard G A Bults; Marten J Van Sinderen; Ing Widya; Hermie J Hermens
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 3.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.