Literature DB >> 9292840

Accuracy of data in computer-based patient records.

W R Hogan1, M M Wagner.   

Abstract

Data in computer-based patient records (CPRs) have many uses beyond their primary role in patient care, including research and health-system management. Although the accuracy of CPR data directly affects these applications, there has been only sporadic interest in, and no previous review of, data accuracy in CPRs. This paper reviews the published studies of data accuracy in CPRs. These studies report highly variable levels of accuracy. This variability stems from differences in study design, in types of data studied, and in the CPRs themselves. These differences confound interpretation of this literature. We conclude that our knowledge of data accuracy in CPRs is not commensurate with its importance and further studies are needed. We propose methodological guidelines for studying accuracy that address shortcomings of the current literature. As CPR data are used increasingly for research, methods used in research databases to continuously monitor and improve accuracy should be applied to CPRs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9292840      PMCID: PMC61252          DOI: 10.1136/jamia.1997.0040342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  30 in total

Review 1.  The reliability of clinical methods, data and judgments (first of two parts).

Authors:  L M Koran
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1975-09-25       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Longitudinal comparative study on the influence of computers on reporting of clinical data.

Authors:  A Gouveia-Oliveira; V D Raposo; N C Salgado; I Almeida; C Nobre-Leitão; F G de Melo
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 10.093

3.  The accuracy of medication data in an outpatient electronic medical record.

Authors:  M M Wagner; W R Hogan
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Assessment of the completeness and accuracy of computer medical records in four practices committed to recording data on computer.

Authors:  M Pringle; P Ward; C Chilvers
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Data quality in computerized patient records. Analysis of a haematology biopsy report database.

Authors:  J H Hohnloser; M R Fischer; A König; B Emmerich
Journal:  Int J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1994-11

6.  An assessment of data quality in the Vermont-Oxford Trials Network database.

Authors:  J D Horbar; K A Leahy
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1995-02

7.  Using belief networks to enhance sharing of medical knowledge between sites with variations in data accuracy.

Authors:  W R Hogan; M M Wagner
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1995

8.  Computer-prompted diagnostic codes.

Authors:  K S Yarnall; J L Michener; W E Broadhead; W E Hammond; C K Tse
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 0.493

9.  Quality of data in the Manchester orthopaedic database.

Authors:  J L Barrie; D R Marsh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-01-18

10.  Systems analysis of adverse drug events. ADE Prevention Study Group.

Authors:  L L Leape; D W Bates; D J Cullen; J Cooper; H J Demonaco; T Gallivan; R Hallisey; J Ives; N Laird; G Laffel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-07-05       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  116 in total

1.  Exploring three approaches for handling incomplete patient histories in a computer-based guideline for childhood immunization.

Authors:  P L Miller; S J Frawley; F G Sayward
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1999

2.  Data quality and the electronic medical record: a role for direct parental data entry.

Authors:  S C Porter; K D Mandl
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1999

3.  Semantic based concept differential retrieval & equivalence detection in clinical terms version 3 (Read Codes).

Authors:  P J Brown; C Price
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1999

4.  Assessing data quality: from concordance, through correctness and completeness, to valid manipulatable representations.

Authors:  P F Brennan; W W Stead
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Evaluation of the quality of information retrieval of clinical findings from a computerized patient database using a semantic terminological model.

Authors:  P J Brown; P Sönksen
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Measuring the quality of medical records: a method for comparing completeness and correctness of clinical encounter data.

Authors:  J R Logan; P N Gorman; B Middleton
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2001

7.  Narrative notes in a nursing information system (NIS).

Authors:  A Porcella
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2001

Review 8.  Defining and improving data quality in medical registries: a literature review, case study, and generic framework.

Authors:  Danielle G T Arts; Nicolette F De Keizer; Gert-Jan Scheffer
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 9.  Computer-assisted versus oral-and-written dietary history taking for diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Igor Wei; Yannis Pappas; Josip Car; Aziz Sheikh; Azeem Majeed
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-12-07

10.  Deriving measures of intensive care unit antimicrobial use from computerized pharmacy data: methods, validation, and overcoming barriers.

Authors:  David N Schwartz; R Scott Evans; Bernard C Camins; Yosef M Khan; James F Lloyd; Nadine Shehab; Kurt Stevenson
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.