Literature DB >> 30741242

Analysis of Anesthesia Screens for Rule-Based Data Quality Assessment Opportunities.

Zhan Wang1, Melody Penning2, Meredith Zozus2.   

Abstract

A rules-based data quality assessment system in electronic health record was explored through compilation of over six thousand data quality rules and twenty-two rule templates. To overcome the lack of knowledge sources and identify additional rules or rule templates, thirty-three anesthesia (perioperative period) EHR screens were reviewed. We analyzed the data elements appearing on anesthesia screens and relationships between them to identify new data quality rules and rule templates relevant to anesthesia care. We present the review process as well as new rules and rule templates identified. We found decomposition and analysis of EHR screens a viable mechanism for acquisition of new data quality rules and proved the number of rules likely tractable and their management scalable.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electronic health record; data quality

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30741242      PMCID: PMC6692112     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform        ISSN: 0926-9630


  17 in total

1.  Aspects of data quality in the new millennium.

Authors:  G Bryant
Journal:  Top Health Inf Manage       Date:  1998-05

Review 2.  Incorrect and incomplete coding and classification of diabetes: a systematic review.

Authors:  M A Stone; J Camosso-Stefinovic; J Wilkinson; S de Lusignan; A T Hattersley; K Khunti
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.359

3.  Info-tsunami: surviving the storm with data quality probes.

Authors:  Philip J B Brown; Victoria Warmington
Journal:  Inform Prim Care       Date:  2003

4.  Analyzing the effect of data quality on the accuracy of clinical decision support systems: a computer simulation approach.

Authors:  Sharique Hasan; Rema Padman
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

Review 5.  A method of identifying and correcting miscoding, misclassification and misdiagnosis in diabetes: a pilot and validation study of routinely collected data.

Authors:  S de Lusignan; K Khunti; J Belsey; A Hattersley; J van Vlymen; H Gallagher; C Millett; N J Hague; C Tomson; K Harris; A Majeed
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.359

6.  Comparison of acute viral hepatitis data quality using two methodologies, 2005-2007.

Authors:  Kashif Iqbal; R Monina Klevens; Ruth Jiles
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

7.  The invisible work of personal health information management among people with multiple chronic conditions: qualitative interview study among patients and providers.

Authors:  Jessica S Ancker; Holly O Witteman; Baria Hafeez; Thierry Provencher; Mary Van de Graaf; Esther Wei
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Do GPs know their patients with cancer? Assessing the quality of cancer registration in Dutch primary care: a cross-sectional validation study.

Authors:  Annet Sollie; Jessika Roskam; Rolf H Sijmons; Mattijs E Numans; Charles W Helsper
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Factors of accepting pain management decision support systems by nurse anesthetists.

Authors:  Ju-Ling Hsiao; Wen-Chu Wu; Rai-Fu Chen
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  A Harmonized Data Quality Assessment Terminology and Framework for the Secondary Use of Electronic Health Record Data.

Authors:  Michael G Kahn; Tiffany J Callahan; Juliana Barnard; Alan E Bauck; Jeff Brown; Bruce N Davidson; Hossein Estiri; Carsten Goerg; Erin Holve; Steven G Johnson; Siaw-Teng Liaw; Marianne Hamilton-Lopez; Daniella Meeker; Toan C Ong; Patrick Ryan; Ning Shang; Nicole G Weiskopf; Chunhua Weng; Meredith N Zozus; Lisa Schilling
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2016-09-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.