Literature DB >> 30815172

Defining and Developing a Generic Framework for Monitoring Data Quality in Clinical Research.

Miss Lauren Houston1,2, A/Prof Ping Yu3, Dr Allison Martin1, Dr Yasmine Probst1,2.   

Abstract

Evidence for the need for high data quality in clinical research is well established. The rigor of clinical research conclusions rely heavily on good quality data, which relies on good documentation practices. Little attention has been given to clear guidelines and definitions to monitor data quality. To address this, a "fit-for-use" data quality monitoring framework (DQMF) for clinical research was developed based on a holistic design-oriented approach. An integrated literature review and feasibility study underpinned the framework development. Ontology of key terms, concepts, methods, and standards were recorded using a consensus approach and mind mapping technique. The DQMF is presented as a nested concentric network illustrating concept relationships and hierarchy. Face validation was conducted, and common terminology and definitions are listed. The consolidated DQMF can be adapted according to study context and data availability aiding in the development of a long-term strategy with increased efficacy for clinical data quality monitoring.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30815172      PMCID: PMC6371251     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  33 in total

Review 1.  Factors that limit the quality, number and progress of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  R J Prescott; C E Counsell; W J Gillespie; A M Grant; I T Russell; S Kiauka; I R Colthart; S Ross; S M Shepherd; D Russell
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  Practices and perspectives on building integrated data repositories: results from a 2010 CTSA survey.

Authors:  Sandra L MacKenzie; Matt C Wyatt; Robert Schuff; Jessica D Tenenbaum; Nick Anderson
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Guidelines for quality assurance in multicenter trials: a position paper.

Authors:  G L Knatterud; F W Rockhold; S L George; F B Barton; C E Davis; W R Fairweather; T Honohan; R Mowery; R O'Neill
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1998-10

4.  A mixed-methods research approach to the review of competency standards for orthotist/prosthetists in Australia.

Authors:  Susan Ash; Jackie O'Connor; Sarah Anderson; Emily Ridgewell; Leigh Clarke
Journal:  Int J Evid Based Healthc       Date:  2015-06

5.  Understanding uptake of continuous quality improvement in Indigenous primary health care: lessons from a multi-site case study of the Audit and Best Practice for Chronic Disease project.

Authors:  Karen L Gardner; Michelle Dowden; Samantha Togni; Ross Bailie
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-03-13       Impact factor: 7.327

6.  What can we learn from a decade of database audits? The Duke Clinical Research Institute experience, 1997--2006.

Authors:  Reza Rostami; Meredith Nahm; Carl F Pieper
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.486

7.  Developing data content specifications for the nationwide health information network trial implementations.

Authors:  Gilad J Kuperman; Jeffrey S Blair; Richard A Franck; Savithri Devaraj; Alexander F H Low
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Standard requirements for GCP-compliant data management in multinational clinical trials.

Authors:  Christian Ohmann; Wolfgang Kuchinke; Steve Canham; Jens Lauritsen; Nader Salas; Carmen Schade-Brittinger; Michael Wittenberg; Gladys McPherson; John McCourt; Francois Gueyffier; Andrea Lorimer; Ferràn Torres
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Quality of clinical trials: A moving target.

Authors:  Arun Bhatt
Journal:  Perspect Clin Res       Date:  2011-10

10.  Remote source document verification in two national clinical trials networks: a pilot study.

Authors:  Meredith Mealer; John Kittelson; B Taylor Thompson; Arthur P Wheeler; John C Magee; Ronald J Sokol; Marc Moss; Michael G Kahn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  A Rule-Based Data Quality Assessment System for Electronic Health Record Data.

Authors:  Zhan Wang; John R Talburt; Ningning Wu; Serhan Dagtas; Meredith Nahm Zozus
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 2.342

2.  Facilitating harmonized data quality assessments. A data quality framework for observational health research data collections with software implementations in R.

Authors:  Carsten Oliver Schmidt; Stephan Struckmann; Cornelia Enzenbach; Achim Reineke; Jürgen Stausberg; Stefan Damerow; Marianne Huebner; Börge Schmidt; Willi Sauerbrei; Adrian Richter
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 4.615

3.  Developing a systematic approach to assessing data quality in secondary use of clinical data based on intended use.

Authors:  Hanieh Razzaghi; Jane Greenberg; L Charles Bailey
Journal:  Learn Health Syst       Date:  2021-05-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.