Literature DB >> 6814331

Tissue impedance and current flow in the implanted ear. Implications for the cochlear prosthesis.

F A Spelman, B M Clopton, B E Pfingst.   

Abstract

Tissue impedance was measured in the cochleas of monkeys and guinea pigs implanted with electrode arrays. The impedances were measured within the scala tympani and between the scala tympani and the internal auditory meatus of the modiolus. The measurements revealed several impedance properties. 1) The impedances inside and outside of the scala tympani are resistive for frequencies between 8 Hz and 12.5 kHz. 2). The impedances measured between the scala tympani and the internal auditory meatus were larger in magnitude than the impedances measured in the scala tympani. 3) Impedance was not affected significantly by changing stimulus current flow from 0.45 to 45 microA rms. 4) Impedance magnitude increased rapidly by different factors inside and outside the scala tympani after sacrifice of the subject animals. Measurements of the tissue impedance made in conjunction with measurements of threshold of response to electrical stimulation revealed that the threshold of response to electrical stimuli was lowest when the stimulating currents were highest outside the scala tympani. We conclude that the excitable elements of the auditory nerve are being stimulated within the modiolus rather than within the scala tympani.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6814331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl        ISSN: 0096-8056


  21 in total

1.  Model-based Vestibular Afferent Stimulation: Modular Workflow for Analyzing Stimulation Scenarios in Patient Specific and Statistical Vestibular Anatomy.

Authors:  Michael Handler; Peter P Schier; Karl D Fritscher; Patrik Raudaschl; Lejo Johnson Chacko; Rudolf Glueckert; Rami Saba; Rainer Schubert; Daniel Baumgarten; Christian Baumgartner
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 4.677

2.  Modelling encapsulation tissue around cochlear implant electrodes.

Authors:  T Hanekom
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Electromotile hearing: acoustic tones mask psychophysical response to high-frequency electrical stimulation of intact guinea pig cochleae.

Authors:  Colleen G Le Prell; Kohei Kawamoto; Yehoash Raphael; David F Dolan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Cochlear implant electrode configuration effects on activation threshold and tonotopic selectivity.

Authors:  Russell L Snyder; John C Middlebrooks; Ben H Bonham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Optical parameter variability in laser nerve stimulation: a study of pulse duration, repetition rate, and wavelength.

Authors:  Agnella D Izzo; Joseph T Walsh; E Duco Jansen; Mark Bendett; Jim Webb; Heather Ralph; Claus-Peter Richter
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Forward-masked spatial tuning curves in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  David A Nelson; Gail S Donaldson; Heather Kreft
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Laser stimulation of auditory neurons: effect of shorter pulse duration and penetration depth.

Authors:  Agnella D Izzo; Joseph T Walsh; Heather Ralph; Jim Webb; Mark Bendett; Jonathon Wells; Claus-Peter Richter
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Virtual Rhesus Labyrinth Model Predicts Responses to Electrical Stimulation Delivered by a Vestibular Prosthesis.

Authors:  Abderrahmane Hedjoudje; Russell Hayden; Chenkai Dai; JoongHo Ahn; Mehdi Rahman; Frank Risi; Jiangyang Zhang; Susumu Mori; Charles C Della Santina
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-06-04

9.  Would an endosteal CI-electrode make sense? Comparison of the auditory nerve excitability from different stimulation sites using ESRT measurements and mathematical models.

Authors:  Hans Wilhelm Pau; Annekathrin Grünbaum; Karsten Ehrt; Rüdiger Dahl; Tino Just; Ursula van Rienen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interface: partial tripolar, single-channel thresholds and psychophysical tuning curves.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer; Kathleen F Faulkner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.