Literature DB >> 31795705

Use of the guinea pig in studies on the development and prevention of acquired sensorineural hearing loss, with an emphasis on noise.

Gaëlle Naert1, Marie-Pierre Pasdelou1, Colleen G Le Prell2.   

Abstract

Guinea pigs have been used in diverse studies to better understand acquired hearing loss induced by noise and ototoxic drugs. The guinea pig has its best hearing at slightly higher frequencies relative to humans, but its hearing is more similar to humans than the rat or mouse. Like other rodents, it is more vulnerable to noise injury than the human or nonhuman primate models. There is a wealth of information on auditory function and vulnerability of the inner ear to diverse insults in the guinea pig. With respect to the assessment of potential otoprotective agents, guinea pigs are also docile animals that are relatively easy to dose via systemic injections or gavage. Of interest, the cochlea and the round window are easily accessible, notably for direct cochlear therapy, as in the chinchilla, making the guinea pig a most relevant and suitable model for hearing. This article reviews the use of the guinea pig in basic auditory research, provides detailed discussion of its use in studies on noise injury and other injuries leading to acquired sensorineural hearing loss, and lists some therapeutics assessed in these laboratory animal models to prevent acquired sensorineural hearing loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31795705      PMCID: PMC7195866          DOI: 10.1121/1.5132711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   2.482


  437 in total

1.  Glutamate and aspartate mimic the afferent transmitter in the cochlea.

Authors:  R P Bobbin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1979-01-15       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Post-exposure administration of edaravone attenuates noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Kuniyoshi Tanaka; Tsuyoshi Takemoto; Kazuma Sugahara; Takeshi Okuda; Takefumi Mikuriya; Kenji Takeno; Makoto Hashimoto; Hiroaki Shimogori; Hiroshi Yamashita
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 4.432

3.  Medial olivocochlear efferent terminals are protected by sound conditioning.

Authors:  B Canlon; A Fransson; A Viberg
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1999-12-11       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Reflex-inhibiting stimuli and the refractory period of the acoustic startle reflex in the rat.

Authors:  J R Ison; E E Krauter
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1974-03

5.  Pentoxifylline increases cochlear blood flow while decreasing blood pressure in guinea pigs.

Authors:  J K Coleman; W S Quirk; H A Dengerink; J W Wright
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-08-01       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Some principal issues in the analysis of noise effects on hearing in experimental animals.

Authors:  W C Stebbins; D B Moody; J V Serafin
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  1982 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.808

7.  Disruption of lateral olivocochlear neurons via a dopaminergic neurotoxin depresses sound-evoked auditory nerve activity.

Authors:  Colleen G Le Prell; Kärin Halsey; Larry F Hughes; David F Dolan; Sanford C Bledsoe
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-04-22

8.  Prevention of cisplatin-induced hearing loss by administration of a thiosulfate-containing gel to the middle ear in a guinea pig model.

Authors:  Cecilia Engmér Berglin; Pernilla Videhult Pierre; Tobias Bramer; Katarina Edsman; Hans Ehrsson; Staffan Eksborg; Göran Laurell
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 3.333

9.  Assessment of nutrient supplement to reduce gentamicin-induced ototoxicity.

Authors:  C G Le Prell; C Ojano-Dirain; E W Rudnick; M A Nelson; S J DeRemer; D M Prieskorn; J M Miller
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-03-04

10.  The relative detectability for mice of gaps having different ramp durations at their onset and offset boundaries.

Authors:  James R Ison; Jason Castro; Paul Allen; Tracy M Virag; Joseph P Walton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  6 in total

1.  Cytomegalovirus Seropositivity as a Potential Risk Factor for Increased Noise Trauma Susceptibility.

Authors:  Moritz Groschel; Stefan Voigt; Susanne Schwitzer; Arne Ernst; Dietmar Basta
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2022 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.293

Review 2.  Investigational Medicinal Products for the Inner Ear: Review of Clinical Trial Characteristics in ClinicalTrials.gov.

Authors:  Colleen G Le Prell
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 1.245

3.  Noise-Induced Hearing Loss and its Prevention: Current Issues in Mammalian Hearing.

Authors:  Colleen G Le Prell; Troy A Hackett; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  Curr Opin Physiol       Date:  2020-07-12

4.  Noise-induced hearing loss and its prevention: Integration of data from animal models and human clinical trials.

Authors:  Colleen G Le Prell; Tanisha L Hammill; William J Murphy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  What's the buzz? The neuroscience and the treatment of tinnitus.

Authors:  A Henton; T Tzounopoulos
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 46.500

6.  Frequency-Following Responses to Speech Sounds Are Highly Conserved across Species and Contain Cortical Contributions.

Authors:  G Nike Gnanateja; Kyle Rupp; Fernando Llanos; Madison Remick; Marianny Pernia; Srivatsun Sadagopan; Tobias Teichert; Taylor J Abel; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2021-12-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.