Literature DB >> 17223284

Combinatorial epigenetics, "junk DNA", and the evolution of complex organisms.

Emile Zuckerkandl1, Giacomo Cavalli.   

Abstract

At certain evolutionary junctures, two or more mutations participating in the build-up of a new complex function may be required to become available simultaneously in the same individuals. How could this happen in higher organisms whose populations are small compared to those of microbes, and in which chances of combined nearly simultaneous highly specific favorable mutations are correspondingly low? The question can in principle be answered for regulatory evolution, one of the basic processes of evolutionary change. A combined resetting of transcription rates in several genes could occur in the same individual. It is proposed that, in eukaryotes, changes in epigenetic trends and epigenetically transforming encounters between alternative chromatin structures could arise frequently enough so as to render probable particular conjunctions of changed transcription rates. Such conjunctions could involve mutational changes with low specificity requirements in gene-associated regions of non-protein-coding sequences. The effects of such mutations, notably when they determine the use of histone variants and covalent modifications of histones, can be among those that migrate along chromatin. Changes in chromatin structure are often cellularly inheritable over at least a limited number of generations of cells, and of individuals when the germ line is involved. SINEs and LINEs, which have been considered "junk DNA", are among the repeat sequences that would appear liable to have teleregulatory effects on the function of a nearby promoter, through changes in their numbers and distribution. There may also be present preexisting unstably inheritable epigenetic trends leading to cellular variegation, trends endemic in a cell population based on DNA sequences previously established in the neighborhood. Either way, epigenetically conditioned teleregulatory trends may display only limited penetrance. The imposition at a distance of new chromatin structures with regulatory impact can occur in cis as well as in trans, and is examined as intrachromosomally spreading teleregulation and interchromosomal "gene kissing". The chances for two or more particular epigenetically determined regulatory trends to occur together in a cell are increased thanks to the proposed low specificity requirements for most of the pertinent sequence changes in intergenic and intronic DNA or in the distribution of middle repetitive sequences that have teleregulatory impact. Inheritable epigenetic changes ("epimutations") with effects at a distance would then perdure over the number of generations required for "assimilation" of the several regulatory novelties through the occurrence and selection, gene by gene, of specific classical mutations. These mutations would have effects similar to the epigenetic effects, yet would provide stability and penetrance. The described epigenetic/genetic partnership may well at times have opened the way toward certain complex new functions. Thus, the presence of "junk DNA", through co-determining the (higher or lower) order and the variants of chromatin structure with regulatory effects at a distance, might make an important contribution to the evolution of complex organisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17223284     DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2006.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gene        ISSN: 0378-1119            Impact factor:   3.688


  17 in total

Review 1.  Chromosome territories.

Authors:  Thomas Cremer; Marion Cremer
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 10.005

2.  The neoselectionist theory of genome evolution.

Authors:  Giorgio Bernardi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Epigenetic responses to environmental change and their evolutionary implications.

Authors:  Bryan M Turner
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Life is more than a computer running DNA software.

Authors:  František Baluška; Guenther Witzany
Journal:  World J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-08-26

5.  Quantification of nanoscale density fluctuations by electron microscopy: probing cellular alterations in early carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Prabhakar Pradhan; Dhwanil Damania; Hrushikesh M Joshi; Vladimir Turzhitsky; Hariharan Subramanian; Hemant K Roy; Allen Taflove; Vinayak P Dravid; Vadim Backman
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Introns form compositional clusters in parallel with the compositional clusters of the coding sequences to which they pertain.

Authors:  Miguel A Fuertes; José M Pérez; Emile Zuckerkandl; Carlos Alonso
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2010-12-04       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  The ghost in our genes: legal and ethical implications of epigenetics.

Authors:  Mark A Rothstein; Yu Cai; Gary E Marchant
Journal:  Health Matrix Clevel       Date:  2009

8.  A role for the MS analysis of nucleic acids in the post-genomics age.

Authors:  Daniele Fabris
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 3.109

9.  Modulation of gene expression in U251 glioblastoma cells by binding of mutant p53 R273H to intronic and intergenic sequences.

Authors:  Marie Brázdová; Timo Quante; Lars Tögel; Korden Walter; Christine Loscher; Vlastimil Tichý; Lenka Cincárová; Wolfgang Deppert; Genrich V Tolstonog
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 10.  Nuclear organization in the 3D space of the nucleus - cause or consequence?

Authors:  Esperanza Nunez; Xiang-Dong Fu; Michael G Rosenfeld
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2009-10-19       Impact factor: 5.578

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.