Literature DB >> 21441647

Quantification of nanoscale density fluctuations by electron microscopy: probing cellular alterations in early carcinogenesis.

Prabhakar Pradhan1, Dhwanil Damania, Hrushikesh M Joshi, Vladimir Turzhitsky, Hariharan Subramanian, Hemant K Roy, Allen Taflove, Vinayak P Dravid, Vadim Backman.   

Abstract

Most cancers are curable if they are diagnosed and treated at an early stage. Recent studies suggest that nanoarchitectural changes occur within cells during early carcinogenesis and that such changes precede microscopically evident tissue alterations. It follows that the ability to comprehensively interrogate cell nanoarchitecture (e.g., macromolecular complexes, DNA, RNA, proteins and lipid membranes) could be critical to the diagnosis of early carcinogenesis. We present a study of the nanoscale mass-density fluctuations of biological tissues by quantifying their degree of disorder at the nanoscale. Transmission electron microscopy images of human tissues are used to construct corresponding effective disordered optical lattices. The properties of nanoscale disorder are then studied by statistical analysis of the inverse participation ratio (IPR) of the spatially localized eigenfunctions of these optical lattices at the nanoscale. Our results show an increase in the disorder of human colonic epithelial cells in subjects harboring early stages of colon neoplasia. Furthermore, our findings strongly suggest that increased nanoscale disorder correlates with the degree of tumorigenicity. Therefore, the IPR technique provides a practicable tool for the detection of nanoarchitectural alterations in the earliest stages of carcinogenesis. Potential applications of the technique for early cancer screening and detection are also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21441647      PMCID: PMC3332100          DOI: 10.1088/1478-3975/8/2/026012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Biol        ISSN: 1478-3967            Impact factor:   2.583


  33 in total

Review 1.  Combinatorial epigenetics, "junk DNA", and the evolution of complex organisms.

Authors:  Emile Zuckerkandl; Giacomo Cavalli
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2006-12-09       Impact factor: 3.688

2.  Interference microscopy and mass determination.

Authors:  H G DAVIES; M H F WILKINS
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1952-03-29       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Prospective grading of neoplastic change in rat esophagus epithelium using angle-resolved low-coherence interferometry.

Authors:  Adam Wax; John W Pyhtila; Robert N Graf; Ronald Nines; Charles W Boone; Ramachandra R Dasari; Michael S Feld; Vernon E Steele; Gary D Stoner
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  Optical methodology for detecting histologically unapparent nanoscale consequences of genetic alterations in biological cells.

Authors:  Hariharan Subramanian; Prabhakar Pradhan; Yang Liu; Ilker R Capoglu; Xu Li; Jeremy D Rogers; Alexander Heifetz; Dhananjay Kunte; Hemant K Roy; Allen Taflove; Vadim Backman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Field defects in progression to gastrointestinal tract cancers.

Authors:  Carol Bernstein; Harris Bernstein; Claire M Payne; Katerina Dvorak; Harinder Garewal
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2007-12-31       Impact factor: 8.679

6.  Beyond heterochromatin: SIR2 inhibits the initiation of DNA replication.

Authors:  Catherine A Fox; Michael Weinreich
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 7.  Epigenetic control.

Authors:  Geneviève P Delcuve; Mojgan Rastegar; James R Davie
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 6.384

8.  Prevalence of clinically important histology in small adenomas.

Authors:  Lynn F Butterly; Michael P Chase; Heiko Pohl; Gale S Fiarman
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 11.382

9.  Chromosome architecture can dictate site-specific initiation of DNA replication in Xenopus egg extracts.

Authors:  S J Lawlis; S M Keezer; J R Wu; D M Gilbert
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Clinical implications and utility of field cancerization.

Authors:  Gabriel D Dakubo; John P Jakupciak; Mark A Birch-Machin; Ryan L Parr
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 5.722

View more
  8 in total

1.  Enhancing the sensitivity of mesoscopic light reflection statistics in weakly disordered media by interface reflections.

Authors:  Daniel J Park; Prabhakar Pradhan; Vadim Backman
Journal:  Int J Mod Phys B       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 1.219

2.  Insights into the field carcinogenesis of ovarian cancer based on the nanocytology of endocervical and endometrial epithelial cells.

Authors:  Dhwanil Damania; Hemant K Roy; Dhananja Kunte; Jean A Hurteau; Hariharan Subramanian; Lusik Cherkezyan; Nela Krosnjar; Maitri Shah; Vadim Backman
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  Optical detection of the structural properties of tumor tissue generated by xenografting of drug-sensitive and drug-resistant cancer cells using partial wave spectroscopy (PWS).

Authors:  Prakash Adhikari; Prashanth K B Nagesh; Fatemah Alharthi; Subhash C Chauhan; Meena Jaggi; Murali M Yallapu; Prabhakar Pradhan
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Light localization properties of weakly disordered optical media using confocal microscopy: application to cancer detection.

Authors:  Peeyush Sahay; Huda M Almabadi; Hemendra M Ghimire; Omar Skalli; Prabhakar Pradhan
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  Studying nanoscale structural alterations in cancer cells to evaluate ovarian cancer drug treatment, using transmission electron microscopy imaging.

Authors:  Prakash Adhikari; Mehedi Hasan; Vijayalakshmi Sridhar; Debarshi Roy; Prabhakar Pradhan
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Clinical significance of MUC13 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Sheema Khan; Nadeem Zafar; Shabia S Khan; Saini Setua; Stephen W Behrman; Zachary E Stiles; Murali M Yallapu; Peeyush Sahay; Hemendra Ghimire; Tomoko Ise; Satoshi Nagata; Lei Wang; Jim Y Wan; Prabhakar Pradhan; Meena Jaggi; Subhash C Chauhan
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  Higher Order Chromatin Modulator Cohesin SA1 Is an Early Biomarker for Colon Carcinogenesis: Race-Specific Implications.

Authors:  Ramesh K Wali; Navneet Momi; Mart Dela Cruz; Audrey H Calderwood; Yolanda Stypula-Cyrus; Luay Almassalha; Anuj Chhaparia; Christopher R Weber; Andrew Radosevich; Ashish K Tiwari; Bilal Latif; Vadim Backman; Hemant K Roy
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2016-08-22

8.  MUC13 interaction with receptor tyrosine kinase HER2 drives pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma progression.

Authors:  S Khan; M Sikander; M C Ebeling; A Ganju; S Kumari; M M Yallapu; B B Hafeez; T Ise; S Nagata; N Zafar; S W Behrman; J Y Wan; H M Ghimire; P Sahay; P Pradhan; S C Chauhan; M Jaggi
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 9.867

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.