Literature DB >> 17221221

Travel distance estimation from visual motion by leaky path integration.

Markus Lappe1, Michael Jenkin, Laurence R Harris.   

Abstract

Visual motion can be a cue to travel distance when the motion signals are integrated. Distance estimates from visually simulated self-motion are imprecise, however. Previous work in our labs has given conflicting results on the imprecision: experiments by Frenz and Lappe had suggested a general underestimation of travel distance, while results from Redlick, Jenkin and Harris had shown an overestimation of travel distance. Here we describe a collaborative study that resolves the conflict by tracing it to differences in the tasks given to the subjects. With an identical set of subjects and identical visual motion simulation we show that underestimation of travel distance occurs when the task involves a judgment of distance from the starting position, and that overestimation of travel distance occurs when the task requires a judgment of the remaining distance to a particular target position. We present a leaky integrator model that explains both effects with a single mechanism. In this leaky integrator model we introduce the idea that, depending on the task, either the distance from start, or the distance to target is used as a state variable. The state variable is updated during the movement by integration over the space covered by the movement, rather than over time. In this model, travel distance mis-estimation occurs because the integration leaks and because the transformation of visual motion to travel distance involves a gain factor. Mis-estimates in both tasks can be explained with the same leak rate and gain in both conditions. Our results thus suggest that observers do not simply integrate traveled distance and then relate it to the task. Instead, the internally represented variable is either distance from the origin or distance to the goal, whichever is relevant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17221221     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0835-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   2.064


  12 in total

1.  The use of optical velocities for distance discrimination and reproduction during visually simulated self motion.

Authors:  F Bremmer; M Lappe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Idiothetic navigation in humans: estimation of path length.

Authors:  M L Mittelstaedt; H Mittelstaedt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Visual space perception and visually directed action.

Authors:  J M Loomis; J A Da Silva; N Fujita; S S Fukusima
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  The contributions of static visual cues, nonvisual cues, and optic flow in distance estimation.

Authors:  Hong-Jin Sun; Jennifer L Campos; Meredith Young; George S W Chan; Colin G Ellard
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Absolute travel distance from optic flow.

Authors:  Harald Frenz; Markus Lappe
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Humans can use optic flow to estimate distance of travel.

Authors:  F P Redlick; M Jenkin; L R Harris
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Nonvisual navigation by blind and sighted: assessment of path integration ability.

Authors:  J M Loomis; R L Klatzky; R G Golledge; J G Cicinelli; J W Pellegrino; P A Fry
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1993-03

8.  Homing in virtual environments: effects of field of view and path layout.

Authors:  P Péruch; M May; F Wartenberg
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Discrimination of travel distances from 'situated' optic flow.

Authors:  Harald Frenz; Frank Bremmer; Markus Lappe
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 10.  Path integration in mammals and its interaction with visual landmarks.

Authors:  A S Etienne; R Maurer; V Séguinot
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  32 in total

1.  Multisensory integration in the estimation of walked distances.

Authors:  Jennifer L Campos; John S Butler; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The role of attention on the integration of visual and inertial cues.

Authors:  Daniel R Berger; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Deriving angular displacement from optic flow: a fMRI study.

Authors:  Volker Diekmann; Reinhart Jürgens; Wolfgang Becker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Visual estimation of travel distance during walking.

Authors:  Markus Lappe; Harald Frenz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Functional correlates of likelihood and prior representations in a virtual distance task.

Authors:  Martin Wiener; Kelly Michaelis; James C Thompson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Locomotor and verbal distance judgments in action and vista space.

Authors:  Johanna Bergmann; Elsa Krauss; Agnes Münch; Reiner Jungmann; Daniel Oberfeld; Heiko Hecht
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Contributions of visual and proprioceptive information to travelled distance estimation during changing sensory congruencies.

Authors:  Jennifer L Campos; John S Butler; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Interrelations between the perception of time and space in large-scale environments.

Authors:  Martin Riemer; Rupert Hölzl; Dieter Kleinböhl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  On the anisotropy of perceived ground extents and the interpretation of walked distance as a measure of perception.

Authors:  Zhi Li; Emily Sun; Cassandra J Strawser; Ariana Spiegel; Brennan Klein; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Imagined self-motion differs from perceived self-motion: evidence from a novel continuous pointing method.

Authors:  Jennifer L Campos; Joshua H Siegle; Betty J Mohler; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Jack M Loomis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.