Literature DB >> 8576691

Path integration in mammals and its interaction with visual landmarks.

A S Etienne1, R Maurer, V Séguinot.   

Abstract

During locomotion, mammals update their position with respect to a fixed point of reference, such as their point of departure, by processing inertial cues, proprioceptive feedback and stored motor commands generated during locomotion. This so-called path integration system (dead reckoning) allows the animal to return to its home, or to a familiar feeding place, even when external cues are absent or novel. However, without the use of external cues, the path integration process leads to rapid accumulation of errors involving both the direction and distance of the goal. Therefore, even nocturnal species such as hamsters and mice rely more on previously learned visual references than on the path integration system when the two types of information are in conflict. Recent studies investigate the extent to which path integration and familiar visual cues cooperate to optimize the navigational performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8576691     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.199.1.201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  79 in total

1.  Head direction cells in rats with hippocampal or overlying neocortical lesions: evidence for impaired angular path integration.

Authors:  E J Golob; J S Taube
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Representation of actions in rats: the role of cerebellum in learning spatial performances by observation.

Authors:  M G Leggio; M Molinari; P Neri; A Graziano; L Mandolesi; L Petrosini
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-02-29       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Path integration absent in scent-tracking fimbria-fornix rats: evidence for hippocampal involvement in "sense of direction" and "sense of distance" using self-movement cues.

Authors:  I Q Whishaw; B Gorny
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Hippocampal spatial representations require vestibular input.

Authors:  Robert W Stackman; Ann S Clark; Jeffrey S Taube
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.899

5.  A subterranean mammal uses the magnetic compass for path integration.

Authors:  Tali Kimchi; Ariane S Etienne; Joseph Terkel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-01-19       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Competition among spatial cues in a naturalistic food-carrying task.

Authors:  Brett M Gibson; Sara J Shettleworth
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 7.  Active and passive contributions to spatial learning.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Chrastil; William H Warren
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-02

Review 8.  Stochastic modelling of animal movement.

Authors:  Peter E Smouse; Stefano Focardi; Paul R Moorcroft; John G Kie; James D Forester; Juan M Morales
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Linear path integration deficits in patients with abnormal vestibular afference.

Authors:  Joeanna C Arthur; Kathleen B Kortte; Mark Shelhamer; Michael C Schubert
Journal:  Seeing Perceiving       Date:  2012

10.  Behavioral and Neural Representations of Spatial Directions across Words, Schemas, and Images.

Authors:  Steven M Weisberg; Steven A Marchette; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.