Literature DB >> 21365183

Locomotor and verbal distance judgments in action and vista space.

Johanna Bergmann1, Elsa Krauss, Agnes Münch, Reiner Jungmann, Daniel Oberfeld, Heiko Hecht.   

Abstract

Judging distances is crucial when interacting with the environment. For short distances in action space (up to 30 m), both explicit verbal estimates and locomotor judgments are fairly accurate. For large distances, data have remained scarce. In two laboratory experiments, our observers judged distances to visual targets presented stereoscopically, either by giving a verbal estimate or by walking the distance to the target on a treadmill. While verbal judgments remained linearly scaled over the whole range of distances from 20 to 262 m, locomotor judgments fell short at distances above 100 m, indicating that observers overestimated the distance they had traveled and increasingly did so as a function of actual target distance. This pattern persisted when controlling for the potential confound of fatigue or reluctance to walk. We discuss different approaches to explain our findings and stress the importance of a differential use of distance cues. A model of leaky path integration showed a good fit with our locomotor data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21365183     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2597-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  28 in total

Review 1.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 2.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning.

Authors:  B Hommel; J Müsseler; G Aschersleben; W Prinz
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.579

3.  Visual perception and the guidance of locomotion without vision to previously seen targets.

Authors:  J J Rieser; D H Ashmead; C R Talor; G A Youngquist
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.490

Review 4.  The posterior parietal cortex: sensorimotor interface for the planning and online control of visually guided movements.

Authors:  Christopher A Buneo; Richard A Andersen
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005-11-21       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Interactions between ego- and allocentric neuronal representations of space.

Authors:  S F W Neggers; R H J Van der Lubbe; N F Ramsey; A Postma
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-02-09       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Revisiting the effect of quality of graphics on distance judgments in virtual environments: a comparison of verbal reports and blind walking.

Authors:  Benjamin R Kunz; Leah Wouters; Daniel Smith; William B Thompson; Sarah H Creem-Regehr
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Terrain influences the accurate judgement of distance.

Authors:  M J Sinai; T L Ooi; Z J He
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Comparison of two indicators of perceived egocentric distance under full-cue and reduced-cue conditions.

Authors:  J W Philbeck; J M Loomis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Travel distance estimation from visual motion by leaky path integration.

Authors:  Markus Lappe; Michael Jenkin; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01-13       Impact factor: 2.064

10.  The representation of object distance: evidence from neuroimaging and neuropsychology.

Authors:  Marian E Berryhill; Ingrid R Olson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  4 in total

1.  Underestimation of large distances in active and passive locomotion.

Authors:  Heiko Hecht; Max Ramdohr; Christoph von Castell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Influence of sensory modality and control dynamics on human path integration.

Authors:  Akis Stavropoulos; Kaushik J Lakshminarasimhan; Jean Laurens; Xaq Pitkow; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 8.713

3.  A Dynamic Bayesian Observer Model Reveals Origins of Bias in Visual Path Integration.

Authors:  Kaushik J Lakshminarasimhan; Marina Petsalis; Hyeshin Park; Gregory C DeAngelis; Xaq Pitkow; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  The effect of furnishing on perceived spatial dimensions and spaciousness of interior space.

Authors:  Christoph von Castell; Daniel Oberfeld; Heiko Hecht
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.