Literature DB >> 10424412

The use of optical velocities for distance discrimination and reproduction during visually simulated self motion.

F Bremmer1, M Lappe.   

Abstract

Successful navigation through an environment requires precise monitoring of direction and distance traveled ("path integration" or "dead reckoning"). Previous studies in blindfolded human subjects showed that velocity information arising from vestibular and somatosensory signals can be used to reproduce passive linear displacements. In these studies, visual information was excluded as sensory cue. Yet, in our everyday life, visual information is very important and usually dominates vestibular and somatosensory cues. In the present study, we investigated whether visual signals can be used to discriminate and reproduce simulated linear displacements. In a first set of experiments, subjects viewed two sequences of linear motion and were asked in a 2AFC task to judge whether the travel distance in the second sequence was larger or shorter than in the first. Displacements in either movement sequence could be forward (f) or backward (b). Subjects were very accurate in discriminating travel distances. Average error was less than 3% and did not depend on displacements being into the same (ff, bb) or opposite direction (fb, bf). In a second set of experiments, subjects had to reproduce a previously seen forward motion (passive condition), either in light or in darkness, i.e., with or without visual feedback. Passive displacements had different velocity profiles (constant, sinusoidal, complex) and speeds and were performed across a textured ground plane, a 2-D plane of dots or through a 3-D cloud of dots. With visual feedback, subjects reproduced distances accurately. Accuracy did not depend on the kind of velocity profile in the passive condition. Subjects tended to reproduce distance by replicating the velocity profile of the passive displacement. Finally, in the condition without visual feedback, subjects reproduced the shape of the velocity profile, but used much higher speeds, resulting in a substantial overshoot of travel distance. Our results show that visual, vestibular, and somatosensory signals are used for path integration, following a common strategy: the use of the velocity profile during self-motion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10424412     DOI: 10.1007/s002210050771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  25 in total

1.  Multisensory integration in the estimation of walked distances.

Authors:  Jennifer L Campos; John S Butler; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Spatial updating in virtual reality: the sufficiency of visual information.

Authors:  Bernhard E Riecke; Douglas W Cunningham; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-09-23

3.  Deriving angular displacement from optic flow: a fMRI study.

Authors:  Volker Diekmann; Reinhart Jürgens; Wolfgang Becker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Visual estimation of travel distance during walking.

Authors:  Markus Lappe; Harald Frenz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Functional correlates of likelihood and prior representations in a virtual distance task.

Authors:  Martin Wiener; Kelly Michaelis; James C Thompson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Integration of visual and tactile information in reproduction of traveled distance.

Authors:  Jan Churan; Johannes Paul; Steffen Klingenhoefer; Frank Bremmer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Mathematical requirements of visual-vestibular integration.

Authors:  Douglas A Hanes
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 2.259

8.  Multisensory integration in the estimation of relative path length.

Authors:  Hong-Jin Sun; Jennifer L Campos; George S W Chan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-06       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Storing upright turns: how visual and vestibular cues interact during the encoding and recalling process.

Authors:  Manuel Vidal; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Imagined self-motion differs from perceived self-motion: evidence from a novel continuous pointing method.

Authors:  Jennifer L Campos; Joshua H Siegle; Betty J Mohler; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Jack M Loomis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.