Literature DB >> 17213435

Physiologic and anatomic assessment of a canine carotid artery stenosis model utilizing phase contrast with vastly undersampled isotropic projection imaging.

A S Turk1, K M Johnson, D Lum, D Niemann, B Aagaard-Kienitz, D Consigny, J Grinde, P Turski, V Haughton, C Mistretta.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Noninvasive assessment of the hemodynamic significance of carotid stenosis is often performed with MR angiography and supplemented with carotid Doppler sonography. Phase contrast with vastly undersampled isotropic projection reconstruction (PC-VIPR), a novel MR imaging technique, accelerates phase-contrast MR flow imaging and provides both images of the vessels and measurements of blood-flow velocities. For this study, we determined the accuracy of PC-VIPR blood-flow velocity measurements to determine pressure gradients across an experimental carotid stenosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A focal stenosis was surgically created in each common carotid artery of 6 canines. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was performed, and the degree of stenosis was determined using the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial methodology. A microcatheter was positioned in the carotid artery proximal and distal to the stenosis, and pressures were measured in the vessel through the catheter. PC-VIPR was then performed on a 1.5T MR imaging scanner with parameters producing 0.8-mm isotropic voxel resolution. From the velocity measurements, pressure gradients were calculated from the Navier-Stokes relationship to compare with the pressures measured by a catheter.
RESULTS: Carotid stenoses in the 50%-85% range were produced in the 12 arteries. Pressure gradients across the stenoses ranged from 6 to 26 mm Hg. The pressure gradient calculated from the PC-VIPR data correlated (r = 0.91, P < .0001) with the actual pressure measurements.
CONCLUSION: With PC-VIPR, a novel MR imaging technique, the hemodynamic effect of a stenosis on flow and pressure can be evaluated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17213435      PMCID: PMC8134124     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  25 in total

1.  Three-dimensional, time-resolved (4D) relative pressure mapping using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  J M Tyszka; D H Laidlaw; J W Asa; J M Silverman
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Noise reduction in MR angiography with nonlinear anisotropic filtering.

Authors:  Jiang Du; Sean B Fain; Tianliang Gu; Thomas M Grist; Charles A Mistretta
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Factors affecting the accuracy of pressure measurements in vascular stenoses from phase-contrast MRI.

Authors:  Abbas Nasiraei-Moghaddam; Geoffrey Behrens; Nasser Fatouraee; Ramesh Agarwal; Eric T Choi; Amir A Amini
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Clinical significance of the flow gap in carotid magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  J E Heiserman; J M Zabramski; B P Drayer; P J Keller
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Intraarterial pressure gradients after randomized angioplasty or stenting of iliac artery lesions. Dutch Iliac Stent Trial Study Group.

Authors:  E Tetteroo; C Haaring; Y van der Graaf; J P van Schaik; A D van Engelen; W P Mali
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Determination of renal arterial stenosis severity: comparison of pressure gradient and vessel diameter.

Authors:  C M Gross; J Krämer; O Weingärtner; F Uhlich; F C Luft; J Waigand; R Dietz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Measuring carotid stenosis on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: diagnostic performance and reproducibility of 3 different methods.

Authors:  Jean Marie K S U-King-Im; Rikin A Trivedi; Justin J Cross; Nicholas J P Higgins; William Hollingworth; Martin Graves; Ilse Joubert; Peter J Kirkpatrick; Nagui M Antoun; Jonathan H Gillard
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2004-07-08       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Fractional flow reserve. A useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow.

Authors:  N H Pijls; B Van Gelder; P Van der Voort; K Peels; F A Bracke; H J Bonnier; M I el Gamal
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-12-01       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Carotid endarterectomy and prevention of cerebral ischemia in symptomatic carotid stenosis. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program 309 Trialist Group.

Authors:  M R Mayberg; S E Wilson; F Yatsu; D G Weiss; L Messina; L A Hershey; C Colling; J Eskridge; D Deykin; H R Winn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-12-18       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  12 in total

1.  In vivo evaluation of quantitative MR angiography in a canine carotid artery stenosis model.

Authors:  M Calderon-Arnulphi; S Amin-Hanjani; A Alaraj; M Zhao; X Du; S Ruland; X J Zhou; K R Thulborn; F T Charbel
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Noninvasive assessment of transstenotic pressure gradients in porcine renal artery stenoses by using vastly undersampled phase-contrast MR angiography.

Authors:  Thorsten A Bley; Kevin M Johnson; Christopher J François; Scott B Reeder; Mark L Schiebler; Benjamin R Landgraf; Daniel Consigny; Thomas M Grist; Oliver Wieben
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Sub-Nyquist acquisition and constrained reconstruction in time resolved angiography.

Authors:  Charles A Mistretta
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Regional hypoxic cerebral vasodilation facilitated by diameter changes primarily in anterior versus posterior circulation.

Authors:  J Mikhail Kellawan; John W Harrell; Alejandro Roldan-Alzate; Oliver Wieben; William G Schrage
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 5.  Comprehensive 4D velocity mapping of the heart and great vessels by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Michael Markl; Philip J Kilner; Tino Ebbers
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 5.364

6.  Noninvasive measurement of pressure gradient across a coronary stenosis using phase contrast (PC)-MRI: A feasibility study.

Authors:  Zixin Deng; Zhaoyang Fan; Sang-Eun Lee; Christopher Nguyen; Yibin Xie; Jianing Pang; Xiaoming Bi; Qi Yang; Byoung-Wook Choi; Jung-Sun Kim; Daniel Berman; Hyuk-Jae Chang; Debiao Li
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Fast whole-brain 4D contrast-enhanced MR angiography with velocity encoding using undersampled radial acquisition and highly constrained projection reconstruction: image-quality assessment in volunteer subjects.

Authors:  Y Wu; W Chang; K M Johnson; J Velikina; H Rowley; C Mistretta; P Turski
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 8.  Magnetic resonance angiography: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Michael P Hartung; Thomas M Grist; Christopher J François
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 5.364

9.  Hemodynamic changes in patients with arteriovenous malformations assessed using high-resolution 3D radial phase-contrast MR angiography.

Authors:  W Chang; M W Loecher; Y Wu; D B Niemann; B Ciske; B Aagaard-Kienitz; S Kecskemeti; K M Johnson; O Wieben; C Mistretta; P Turski
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Noninvasive measurement of intra-aneurysmal pressure and flow pattern using phase contrast with vastly undersampled isotropic projection imaging.

Authors:  R Moftakhar; B Aagaard-Kienitz; K Johnson; P A Turski; A S Turk; D B Niemann; D Consigny; J Grinde; O Wieben; C A Mistretta
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.