Michael Markl1, Philip J Kilner, Tino Ebbers. 1. Department of Radiology, Medical Physics, University Hospital Freiburg, Germany. michael.markl@uniklinik-freiburg.de
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is able to measure all three directional components of the velocities of blood flow relative to the three spatial dimensions and the time course of the heart cycle. In this article, methods used for the acquisition, visualization, and quantification of such datasets are reviewed and illustrated. METHODS: Currently, the acquisition of 3D cine (4D) phase contrast velocity data, synchronized relative to both cardiac and respiratory movements takes about ten minutes or more, even when using parallel imaging and optimized pulse sequence design. The large resulting datasets need appropriate post processing for the visualization of multidirectional flow, for example as vector fields, pathlines or streamlines, or for retrospective volumetric quantification. APPLICATIONS: Multidirectional velocity acquisitions have provided 3D visualization of large scale flow features of the healthy heart and great vessels, and have shown altered patterns of flow in abnormal chambers and vessels. Clinically relevant examples include retrograde streams in atheromatous descending aortas as potential thrombo-embolic pathways in patients with cryptogenic stroke and marked variations of flow visualized in common aortic pathologies. Compared to standard clinical tools, 4D velocity mapping offers the potential for retrospective quantification of flow and other hemodynamic parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Multidirectional, 3D cine velocity acquisitions are contributing to the understanding of normal and pathologically altered blood flow features. Although more rapid and user-friendly strategies for acquisition and analysis may be needed before 4D velocity acquisitions come to be adopted in routine clinical CMR, their capacity to measure multidirectional flows throughout a study volume has contributed novel insights into cardiovascular fluid dynamics in health and disease.
BACKGROUND: Phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is able to measure all three directional components of the velocities of blood flow relative to the three spatial dimensions and the time course of the heart cycle. In this article, methods used for the acquisition, visualization, and quantification of such datasets are reviewed and illustrated. METHODS: Currently, the acquisition of 3D cine (4D) phase contrast velocity data, synchronized relative to both cardiac and respiratory movements takes about ten minutes or more, even when using parallel imaging and optimized pulse sequence design. The large resulting datasets need appropriate post processing for the visualization of multidirectional flow, for example as vector fields, pathlines or streamlines, or for retrospective volumetric quantification. APPLICATIONS: Multidirectional velocity acquisitions have provided 3D visualization of large scale flow features of the healthy heart and great vessels, and have shown altered patterns of flow in abnormal chambers and vessels. Clinically relevant examples include retrograde streams in atheromatous descending aortas as potential thrombo-embolic pathways in patients with cryptogenic stroke and marked variations of flow visualized in common aortic pathologies. Compared to standard clinical tools, 4D velocity mapping offers the potential for retrospective quantification of flow and other hemodynamic parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Multidirectional, 3D cine velocity acquisitions are contributing to the understanding of normal and pathologically altered blood flow features. Although more rapid and user-friendly strategies for acquisition and analysis may be needed before 4D velocity acquisitions come to be adopted in routine clinical CMR, their capacity to measure multidirectional flows throughout a study volume has contributed novel insights into cardiovascular fluid dynamics in health and disease.
Authors: Zoran Stankovic; Alex Frydrychowicz; Zoltan Csatari; Elisabeth Panther; Peter Deibert; Wulf Euringer; Wolfgang Kreisel; Maximilian Russe; Simon Bauer; Mathias Langer; Michael Markl Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Stijntje D Roes; Sebastiaan Hammer; Rob J van der Geest; Nina Ajmone Marsan; Jeroen J Bax; Hildo J Lamb; Johan H C Reiber; Albert de Roos; Jos J M Westenberg Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Andreas Harloff; Jan Simon; Stefanie Brendecke; Dawit Assefa; Thomas Helbing; Alex Frydrychowicz; Johannes Weber; Manfred Olschewski; Christoph Strecker; Jürgen Hennig; Cornelius Weiller; Michael Markl Journal: Stroke Date: 2010-04-29 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Michael D Hope; Thomas A Hope; Alison K Meadows; Karen G Ordovas; Thomas H Urbania; Marcus T Alley; Charles B Higgins Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Michael Markl; Wolf Wallis; Stefanie Brendecke; Jan Simon; Alex Frydrychowicz; Andreas Harloff Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Andreas Harloff; Andrea Nussbaumer; Simon Bauer; Aurélien F Stalder; Alex Frydrychowicz; Cornelius Weiller; Jürgen Hennig; Michael Markl Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Eileen Hwuang; Marta Vidorreta; Nadav Schwartz; Brianna F Moon; Kirpal Kochar; Matthew Dylan Tisdall; John A Detre; Walter R T Witschey Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2018-11-03 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Edouard Semaan; Michael Markl; S Chris Malaisrie; Alex Barker; Bradley Allen; Patrick McCarthy; James C Carr; Jeremy D Collins Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2013-12-06 Impact factor: 4.191