Zixin Deng1,2, Zhaoyang Fan1, Sang-Eun Lee3, Christopher Nguyen1, Yibin Xie1, Jianing Pang1, Xiaoming Bi4, Qi Yang1, Byoung-Wook Choi5, Jung-Sun Kim3, Daniel Berman1, Hyuk-Jae Chang3, Debiao Li1,2,6. 1. Biomedical Imaging Research Institute, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA. 2. Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA. 3. Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Seoul, South Korea. 4. Siemens Healthcare R&D, Los Angeles, USA. 5. Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Seoul, South Korea. 6. Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility of blood pressure difference measurement, ΔP, across the coronary artery using phase contrast (PC)-MRI for potential noninvasive assessment of the functional significance of coronary artery stenosis. METHODS: Three-directional velocities in the coronary arteries acquired using 2D-PC-MRI were used with the Navier-Stokes equations to derive ΔP. Repeat phantom studies were performed to assess the reproducibility of flow velocity and ΔP. ΔP derived using PC-MRI (ΔPMR ) and that obtained using pressure transducer (ΔPPT ) were compared. Reproducibility of coronary flow velocity was assessed in healthy controls (n = 11). Patients with suspected coronary artery disease (n = 6) were studied to evaluate the feasibility of ΔPMR measurement across a coronary stenosis. RESULTS: Phantom: Good overall reproducibility of flow velocity and ΔP measurements and excellent correlation (ΔPMR vs ΔPPT ) was observed: intraclass correlation (ICC) of 0.95(Vz ), 0.72(Vx ), 0.73(Vy ), and 0.87(ΔPMR ) and R2 = 0.94, respectively. Human: Good reproducibility of coronary flow velocity was observed: ICC of 0.94/0.95(Vz ), 0.76/0.74(Vx ), and 0.80/0.77(Vy ) at cardiac phase 1/2. Significant (p = 0.025) increase in ΔPMR was observed in patients (6.40 ± 4.43 mmHg) versus controls (0.70 ± 0.57 mmHg). CONCLUSION: ΔPMR in the coronary arteries is feasible. Upon further validation using the invasive measure, ΔPMR has the potential for noninvasive assessment of coronary artery stenosis. Magn Reson Med 77:529-537, 2017.
PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility of blood pressure difference measurement, ΔP, across the coronary artery using phase contrast (PC)-MRI for potential noninvasive assessment of the functional significance of coronary artery stenosis. METHODS: Three-directional velocities in the coronary arteries acquired using 2D-PC-MRI were used with the Navier-Stokes equations to derive ΔP. Repeat phantom studies were performed to assess the reproducibility of flow velocity and ΔP. ΔP derived using PC-MRI (ΔPMR ) and that obtained using pressure transducer (ΔPPT ) were compared. Reproducibility of coronary flow velocity was assessed in healthy controls (n = 11). Patients with suspected coronary artery disease (n = 6) were studied to evaluate the feasibility of ΔPMR measurement across a coronary stenosis. RESULTS: Phantom: Good overall reproducibility of flow velocity and ΔP measurements and excellent correlation (ΔPMR vs ΔPPT ) was observed: intraclass correlation (ICC) of 0.95(Vz ), 0.72(Vx ), 0.73(Vy ), and 0.87(ΔPMR ) and R2 = 0.94, respectively. Human: Good reproducibility of coronary flow velocity was observed: ICC of 0.94/0.95(Vz ), 0.76/0.74(Vx ), and 0.80/0.77(Vy ) at cardiac phase 1/2. Significant (p = 0.025) increase in ΔPMR was observed in patients (6.40 ± 4.43 mmHg) versus controls (0.70 ± 0.57 mmHg). CONCLUSION: ΔPMR in the coronary arteries is feasible. Upon further validation using the invasive measure, ΔPMR has the potential for noninvasive assessment of coronary artery stenosis. Magn Reson Med 77:529-537, 2017.
Authors: Nico H J Pijls; William F Fearon; Pim A L Tonino; Uwe Siebert; Fumiaki Ikeno; Bernhard Bornschein; Marcel van't Veer; Volker Klauss; Ganesh Manoharan; Thomas Engstrøm; Keith G Oldroyd; Peter N Ver Lee; Philip A MacCarthy; Bernard De Bruyne Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2010-05-28 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Sayan Sen; Javier Escaned; Iqbal S Malik; Ghada W Mikhail; Rodney A Foale; Rafael Mila; Jason Tarkin; Ricardo Petraco; Christopher Broyd; Richard Jabbour; Amarjit Sethi; Christopher S Baker; Micheal Bellamy; Mahmud Al-Bustami; David Hackett; Masood Khan; David Lefroy; Kim H Parker; Alun D Hughes; Darrel P Francis; Carlo Di Mario; Jamil Mayet; Justin E Davies Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2011-12-07 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Stephan D Fihn; Julius M Gardin; Jonathan Abrams; Kathleen Berra; James C Blankenship; Apostolos P Dallas; Pamela S Douglas; Joanne M Foody; Thomas C Gerber; Alan L Hinderliter; Spencer B King; Paul D Kligfield; Harlan M Krumholz; Raymond Y K Kwong; Michael J Lim; Jane A Linderbaum; Michael J Mack; Mark A Munger; Richard L Prager; Joseph F Sabik; Leslee J Shaw; Joanna D Sikkema; Craig R Smith; Sidney C Smith; John A Spertus; Sankey V Williams; Jeffrey L Anderson Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-11-19 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Javier Escaned; Mauro Echavarría-Pinto; Hector M Garcia-Garcia; Tim P van de Hoef; Ton de Vries; Prashant Kaul; Ganesh Raveendran; John D Altman; Howard I Kurz; Johannes Brechtken; Mark Tulli; Clemens Von Birgelen; Joel E Schneider; Ahmed A Khashaba; Allen Jeremias; Jim Baucum; Raul Moreno; Martijn Meuwissen; Gregory Mishkel; Robert-Jan van Geuns; Howard Levite; Ramon Lopez-Palop; Marc Mayhew; Patrick W Serruys; Habib Samady; Jan J Piek; Amir Lerman Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: A S Turk; K M Johnson; D Lum; D Niemann; B Aagaard-Kienitz; D Consigny; J Grinde; P Turski; V Haughton; C Mistretta Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Pim A L Tonino; William F Fearon; Bernard De Bruyne; Keith G Oldroyd; Massoud A Leesar; Peter N Ver Lee; Philip A Maccarthy; Marcel Van't Veer; Nico H J Pijls Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2010-06-22 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Jennifer Keegan; Claire E Raphael; Kim Parker; Robin M Simpson; Stephen Strain; Ranil de Silva; Carlo Di Mario; Julian Collinson; Rod H Stables; Ricardo Wage; Peter Drivas; Malindie Sugathapala; Sanjay K Prasad; David N Firmin Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2015-10-02 Impact factor: 5.364