Literature DB >> 17211807

Proximate causes of Rensch's rule: does sexual size dimorphism in arthropods result from sex differences in development time?

Wolf U Blanckenhorn1, Anthony F G Dixon, Daphne J Fairbairn, Matthias W Foellmer, Patricia Gibert, Kim van der Linde, Rudolf Meier, Sören Nylin, Scott Pitnick, Christopher Schoff, Martino Signorelli, Tiit Teder, Christer Wiklund.   

Abstract

A prominent interspecific pattern of sexual size dimorphism (SSD) is Rensch's rule, according to which male body size is more variable or evolutionarily divergent than female body size. Assuming equal growth rates of males and females, SSD would be entirely mediated, and Rensch's rule proximately caused, by sexual differences in development times, or sexual bimaturism (SBM), with the larger sex developing for a proportionately longer time. Only a subset of the seven arthropod groups investigated in this study exhibits Rensch's rule. Furthermore, we found only a weak positive relationship between SSD and SBM overall, suggesting that growth rate differences between the sexes are more important than development time differences in proximately mediating SSD in a wide but by no means comprehensive range of arthropod taxa. Except when protandry is of selective advantage (as in many butterflies, Hymenoptera, and spiders), male development time was equal to (in water striders and beetles) or even longer than (in drosophilid and sepsid flies) that of females. Because all taxa show female-biased SSD, this implies faster growth of females in general, a pattern markedly different from that of primates and birds (analyzed here for comparison). We discuss three potential explanations for this pattern based on life-history trade-offs and sexual selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17211807     DOI: 10.1086/510597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  42 in total

1.  Golden Orbweavers Ignore Biological Rules: Phylogenomic and Comparative Analyses Unravel a Complex Evolution of Sexual Size Dimorphism.

Authors:  Matjaž Kuntner; Chris A Hamilton; Ren-Chung Cheng; Matjaž Gregorič; Nik Lupše; Tjaša Lokovšek; Emily Moriarty Lemmon; Alan R Lemmon; Ingi Agnarsson; Jonathan A Coddington; Jason E Bond
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 15.683

2.  Inverse Rensch's rule in a frog with female-biased sexual size dimorphism.

Authors:  Wen Bo Liao; Wei Chen
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2012-04-17

3.  Equal temperature-size responses of the sexes are widespread within arthropod species.

Authors:  Andrew G Hirst; Curtis R Horne; David Atkinson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Sexually dimorphic body size and development time plasticity in Aedes mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae).

Authors:  Jillian D Wormington; Steven A Juliano
Journal:  Evol Ecol Res       Date:  2014

5.  Environmental effects on sexual size dimorphism of a seed-feeding beetle.

Authors:  R Craig Stillwell; Charles W Fox
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Sexual conflict and the gender load: correlated evolution between population fitness and sexual dimorphism in seed beetles.

Authors:  Göran Arnqvist; Midori Tuda
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  A developmental perspective on the evolution of sexual size dimorphism of a moth.

Authors:  R Craig Stillwell; Goggy Davidowitz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Macroevolutionary patterns of sexual size dimorphism in copepods.

Authors:  Andrew G Hirst; Thomas Kiørboe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Development and growth in synanthropic species: plasticity and constraints.

Authors:  Simona Kralj-Fišer; Tatjana Čelik; Tjaša Lokovšek; Klavdija Šuen; Rebeka Šiling; Matjaž Kuntner
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2014-06-05

10.  Allometry for Sexual Size Dimorphism in Stoneflies Defies the Rensch's Rule.

Authors:  R Guillermo-Ferreira; M C Novaes; L S Lecci; P C Bispo
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 1.434

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.