Literature DB >> 22528023

Inverse Rensch's rule in a frog with female-biased sexual size dimorphism.

Wen Bo Liao1, Wei Chen.   

Abstract

Rensch's rule claims that sexual size dimorphism (SSD) increases with body size when males are larger but decreases with body size when males are smaller. Chinese wood frog Rana chensinensis is a medium-sized species with female-biased size dimorphism. Using data on body size and age in 27 populations covering the full known size range of the species, we tested the consistency of allometric relationships between the sexes with Rensch's rule and evaluated the hypothesis that SSD is largely a function of age differences between the sexes. The results showed that level of female-biased SSD increased with increasing mean size, supporting the inverse of Rensch's rule. Moreover, most of the variation in SSD can be explained in terms of differences in age between the sexes in populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22528023     DOI: 10.1007/s00114-012-0913-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Naturwissenschaften        ISSN: 0028-1042


  6 in total

1.  Sexual size dimorphism in anurans.

Authors:  Jean-Matthieu Monnet; Michael I Cherry
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Sexual selection explains Rensch's rule of size dimorphism in shorebirds.

Authors:  Tamás Székely; Robert P Freckleton; John D Reynolds
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-10       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Proximate causes of Rensch's rule: does sexual size dimorphism in arthropods result from sex differences in development time?

Authors:  Wolf U Blanckenhorn; Anthony F G Dixon; Daphne J Fairbairn; Matthias W Foellmer; Patricia Gibert; Kim van der Linde; Rudolf Meier; Sören Nylin; Scott Pitnick; Christopher Schoff; Martino Signorelli; Tiit Teder; Christer Wiklund
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Rensch's rule inverted--female-driven gigantism in nine-spined stickleback Pungitius pungitius.

Authors:  Gábor Herczeg; Abigél Gonda; Juha Merilä
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 5.091

5.  Domestic chickens defy Rensch's rule: sexual size dimorphism in chicken breeds.

Authors:  V Remeš; T Székely
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.411

6.  Sexual selection explains Rensch's rule of allometry for sexual size dimorphism.

Authors:  James Dale; Peter O Dunn; Jordi Figuerola; Terje Lislevand; Tamás Székely; Linda A Whittingham
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

  6 in total
  4 in total

1.  Strong support for Rensch's rule in an American clade of lizards (Teiidae and Gymnophtalmidae) and a paradox of the largest tejus.

Authors:  Petra Frýdlová; Daniel Frynta
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2015-04-16

2.  Andrew meets Rensch: sexual size dimorphism and the inverse of Rensch's rule in Andrew's toad (Bufo andrewsi).

Authors:  Wen Bo Liao; Wen Chao Liu; Juha Merilä
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Female-biased gape and body-size dimorphism in the New World watersnakes (tribe: Thamnophiini) oppose predictions from Rensch's rule.

Authors:  Frank T Burbrink; India Futterman
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Sexual size dimorphism in anurans fails to obey Rensch's rule.

Authors:  Wen Bo Liao; Yu Zeng; Cai Quan Zhou; Robert Jehle
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2013-03-09       Impact factor: 3.172

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.