Literature DB >> 26645202

Equal temperature-size responses of the sexes are widespread within arthropod species.

Andrew G Hirst1, Curtis R Horne2, David Atkinson3.   

Abstract

Sexual size dimorphism (SSD) is often affected by environmental conditions, but the effect of temperature on SSD in ectotherms still requires rigorous investigation. We compared the plastic responses of size-at-maturity to temperature between males and females within 85 diverse arthropod species, in which individuals of both sexes were reared through ontogeny under identical conditions with excess food. We find that the sexes show similar relative (proportional) temperature-body size (T-S) responses on average. The high degree of similarity occurs despite an analysis that includes a wide range of animal body sizes, variation in degree of SSD and differences in the sign of the T-S response. We find no support for Rensch's rule, which predicts greater variation in male size, or indeed the reverse, greater female size variation. SSD shows no systematic temperature dependence in any of the 17 arthropod orders examined, five of which (Diptera, Orthoptera, Lepidoptera, Coleoptera and Calanoida) include more than six thermal responses. We suggest that the same proportional T-S response may generally have equivalent fitness costs and benefits in both sexes. This contrasts with effects of juvenile density, and food quantity/quality, which commonly result in greater size plasticity in females, suggesting these variables have different adaptive effects on SSD.
© 2015 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  body size; dimorphism; phenotypic plasticity; sex; temperature

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26645202      PMCID: PMC4685787          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.2475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  20 in total

Review 1.  The evolution of body size: what keeps organisms small?

Authors:  W U Blanckenhorn
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.875

Review 2.  The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.

Authors:  R Bonduriansky
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2001-08

3.  Protists decrease in size linearly with temperature: ca. 2.5% degrees C(-1).

Authors:  David Atkinson; Benjamin J Ciotti; David J S Montagnes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  A review of techniques for quantifying sexual size dimorphism.

Authors:  J E Lovich; J W Gibbons
Journal:  Growth Dev Aging       Date:  1992

5.  From cells to colonies: at what levels of body organization does the 'temperature-size rule' apply?

Authors:  David Atkinson; Simon A Morley; Roger N Hughes
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.930

6.  The temperature-size rule in ectotherms: may a general explanation exist after all?

Authors:  Richard John Walters; Mark Hassall
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2006-03-14       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  When Rensch meets Bergmann: does sexual size dimorphism change systematically with latitude?

Authors:  Wolf U Blanckenhorn; R Craig Stillwell; Kyle A Young; Charles W Fox; Kyle G Ashton
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Proximate causes of Rensch's rule: does sexual size dimorphism in arthropods result from sex differences in development time?

Authors:  Wolf U Blanckenhorn; Anthony F G Dixon; Daphne J Fairbairn; Matthias W Foellmer; Patricia Gibert; Kim van der Linde; Rudolf Meier; Sören Nylin; Scott Pitnick; Christopher Schoff; Martino Signorelli; Tiit Teder; Christer Wiklund
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 3.926

9.  Environmental effects on sexual size dimorphism of a seed-feeding beetle.

Authors:  R Craig Stillwell; Charles W Fox
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Allometry for sexual size dimorphism: testing two hypotheses for Rensch's rule in the water strider Aquarius remigis.

Authors:  Daphne J Fairbairn
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.926

View more
  6 in total

1.  Seasonal body size reductions with warming covary with major body size gradients in arthropod species.

Authors:  Curtis R Horne; Andrew G Hirst; David Atkinson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Ecophysiological determinants of sexual size dimorphism: integrating growth trajectories, environmental conditions, and metabolic rates.

Authors:  Marie-Claire Chelini; John P Delong; Eileen A Hebets
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Largely flat latitudinal life history clines in the dung fly Sepsis fulgens across Europe (Diptera: Sepsidae).

Authors:  Jeannine Roy; Wolf U Blanckenhorn; Patrick T Rohner
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Latitudinal cogradient variation of development time and growth rate and a negative latitudinal body weight cline in a widely distributed cabbage beetle.

Authors:  Jianjun Tang; Haimin He; Chao Chen; Shu Fu; Fangsen Xue
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The influence of ecological and life history factors on ectothermic temperature-size responses: Analysis of three Lycaenidae butterflies (Lepidoptera).

Authors:  Rebecca J Wilson; Stephen J Brooks; Phillip B Fenberg
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  The effect of seed traits on geographic variation in body size and sexual size dimorphism of the seed-feeding beetle Acanthoscelides macrophthalmus.

Authors:  Eloísa B Haga; Marcelo N Rossi
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 2.912

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.