Literature DB >> 17196054

Which factors predict placebo response in anxiety disorders and major depression? An analysis of placebo-controlled studies of escitalopram.

Dan J Stein1, David S Baldwin, Ornah T Dolberg, Nicolas Despiegel, Borwin Bandelow.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The placebo response rate has increased in several psychiatric disorders and is a major issue in the design and interpretation of clinical trials. The current investigation attempted to identify potential predictors of placebo response through examination of the placebo-controlled clinical trial database for escitalopram in 3 anxiety disorders and in major depressive disorder (MDD).
METHOD: Raw data from placebo-controlled studies (conducted from 2002 through the end of 2004) of escitalopram in patients meeting DSM-IV criteria for MDD and anxiety disorders (generalized anxiety disorder [GAD], social anxiety disorder [SAD], panic disorder) were used. Potential predictors examined were type of disorder, location of study, dosing regimen, number of treatment arms, gender of patients, and duration and severity of disorder.
RESULTS: Placebo response (defined as the percent decrease from baseline in the reference scale) was higher in GAD and MDD studies conducted in Europe (p < .0001 and p = .0006, respectively) and was not associated with gender or duration of episode. In GAD, the placebo response rate was higher in a European fixed-dose study, which also had more treatment arms. In SAD and in U.S. specialist-treated MDD, a higher placebo response rate was predicted by decreased baseline disorder severity.
CONCLUSION: Additional work is needed before definitive recommendations can be made about whether standard exclusion criteria in clinical trials of antidepressants, such as mild severity of illness, maximize medication-to-placebo differences. This analysis in a range of anxiety disorders and MDD suggests that there may be instances in which the predictors of placebo response rate themselves vary across different conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17196054     DOI: 10.4088/jcp.v67n1111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry        ISSN: 0160-6689            Impact factor:   4.384


  25 in total

1.  Antidepressant-placebo differences: is the glass half full or half empty?

Authors:  Dan J Stein
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 49.548

2.  A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of selegiline transdermal system in depressed adolescents.

Authors:  Melissa P DelBello; Thomas J Hochadel; Kimberly Blanchard Portland; Albert J Azzaro; Alain Katic; Arif Khan; Graham Emslie
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 2.576

3.  The placebo effect and its clinical associations in gambling disorder.

Authors:  Jon E Grant; Samuel R Chamberlain
Journal:  Ann Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.567

4.  A Novel Methodology to Estimate the Treatment Effect in Presence of Highly Variable Placebo Response.

Authors:  Roberto Gomeni; Navin Goyal; Françoise Bressolle; Maurizio Fava
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 7.853

5.  Has the rising placebo response impacted antidepressant clinical trial outcome? Data from the US Food and Drug Administration 1987-2013.

Authors:  Arif Khan; Kaysee Fahl Mar; Jim Faucett; Shirin Khan Schilling; Walter A Brown
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 49.548

6.  A Randomized, Double-blind Study of the Efficacy and Tolerability of Extended Release Quetiapine Fumarate (Quetiapine XR) Monotherapy in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder.

Authors:  Gang Wang; Alexander McIntyre; Willie R Earley; Shane Raines; Hans Eriksson
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull       Date:  2012-02-15

7.  Exposure-response modeling of anti-depressant treatments: the confounding role of placebo effect.

Authors:  Navin Goyal; Roberto Gomeni
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 2.745

8.  INFLUENCE OF STUDY DESIGN ON TREATMENT RESPONSE IN ANXIETY DISORDER CLINICAL TRIALS.

Authors:  Bret R Rutherford; Veronika S Bailey; Franklin R Schneier; Emily Pott; Patrick J Brown; Steven P Roose
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 6.505

Review 9.  A model of placebo response in antidepressant clinical trials.

Authors:  Bret R Rutherford; Steven P Roose
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 18.112

10.  Prayer and healing: A medical and scientific perspective on randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Chittaranjan Andrade; Rajiv Radhakrishnan
Journal:  Indian J Psychiatry       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.