Literature DB >> 28498591

Has the rising placebo response impacted antidepressant clinical trial outcome? Data from the US Food and Drug Administration 1987-2013.

Arif Khan1,2, Kaysee Fahl Mar1, Jim Faucett1, Shirin Khan Schilling1,3, Walter A Brown4.   

Abstract

More than fifteen years ago, it was noted that the failure rate of antidepressant clinical trials was high, and such negative outcomes were thought to be related to the increasing magnitude of placebo response. However, there is considerable debate regarding this phenomenon and its relationship to outcomes in more recent antidepressant clinical trials. To investigate this, we accessed the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reviews for sixteen antidepressants (85 trials, 115 trial arms, 23,109 patients) approved between 1987 and 2013. We calculated the magnitude of placebo and antidepressant responses, antidepressant-placebo differences, as well as the effect sizes and success rates, and compared these measures over time. Exploratory analysis investigated potential changes in trial design and conduct over time. As expected, the magnitude of placebo response has steadily grown in the past 30 years, increasing since 2000 by 6.4% (r=0.46, p<0.001). Contrary to expectations, a similar increase has occurred in the magnitude of antidepressant response (6.0%, r=0.37, p<0.001). Thus, the effect sizes (0.30 vs. 0.29, p=0.42) and the magnitude of antidepressant-placebo differences (10.5% vs. 10.3%, p=0.37) have remained statistically equivalent. Furthermore, the frequency of positive trial arms has gone up in the past 15 years (from 47.8% to 63.8%), but this difference in frequency has not reached statistical significance. Trial design features that were previously associated with a possible lower magnitude of placebo response were not implemented, and their relationship to the magnitude of placebo response could not be replicated. Of the 34 recent trials, two implemented enhanced interview techniques, but both of them were unsuccessful. The results of this study suggest that the relationship between the magnitude of placebo response and the outcome of antidepressant clinical trials is weak at best. These data further indicate that antidepressant-placebo differences are about the same for all of the sixteen antidepressants approved by the FDA in the past thirty years.
© 2017 World Psychiatric Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antidepressants; antidepressant-placebo difference; clinical trials; effect size; enhanced interview techniques; placebo response; success rate

Year:  2017        PMID: 28498591      PMCID: PMC5428172          DOI: 10.1002/wps.20421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Psychiatry        ISSN: 1723-8617            Impact factor:   49.548


  42 in total

Review 1.  Does inclusion of a placebo arm influence response to active antidepressant treatment in randomized controlled trials? Results from pooled and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Mark Sinyor; Anthony J Levitt; Amy H Cheung; Ayal Schaffer; Alex Kiss; Yekta Dowlati; Krista L Lanctôt
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 4.384

2.  The problem of measurement error in multisite clinical trials.

Authors:  M A Demitrack; D Faries; J M Herrera; D DeBrota; W Z Potter
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull       Date:  1998

3.  Symptom reduction and suicide risk in patients treated with placebo in antidepressant clinical trials: a replication analysis of the Food and Drug Administration Database.

Authors:  A Khan; S R Khan; R M Leventhal; W A Brown
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.176

4.  Severity of depressive symptoms and response to antidepressants and placebo in antidepressant trials.

Authors:  Arif Khan; Amy E Brodhead; Russell L Kolts; Walter A Brown
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.791

5.  Symptom reduction and suicide risk in patients treated with placebo in antidepressant clinical trials: an analysis of the Food and Drug Administration database.

Authors:  A Khan; H A Warner; W A Brown
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2000-04

Review 6.  Antidepressant drug effects and depression severity: a patient-level meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jay C Fournier; Robert J DeRubeis; Steven D Hollon; Sona Dimidjian; Jay D Amsterdam; Richard C Shelton; Jan Fawcett
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Does the probability of receiving placebo influence clinical trial outcome? A meta-regression of double-blind, randomized clinical trials in MDD.

Authors:  George I Papakostas; Maurizio Fava
Journal:  Eur Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 4.600

Review 8.  A model of placebo response in antidepressant clinical trials.

Authors:  Bret R Rutherford; Steven P Roose
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 18.112

9.  Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy.

Authors:  Erick H Turner; Annette M Matthews; Eftihia Linardatos; Robert A Tell; Robert Rosenthal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Which placebo to cure depression? A thought-provoking network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Florian Naudet; Bruno Millet; Philippe Charlier; Jean Michel Reymann; Anne Solène Maria; Bruno Falissard
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 8.775

View more
  22 in total

1.  Chance of response to an antidepressant: what should we say to the patient?

Authors:  Tilman Steinert
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 49.548

Review 2.  Essential statistical principles of clinical trials of pain treatments.

Authors:  Robert H Dworkin; Scott R Evans; Omar Mbowe; Michael P McDermott
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2020-12-18

3.  Placebo Response in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Katie Bechman; Mark Yates; Sam Norton; Andrew P Cope; James B Galloway
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 4.666

4.  Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Esketamine Adjunctive to Oral Antidepressant Therapy in Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Ella J Daly; Jaskaran B Singh; Maggie Fedgchin; Kimberly Cooper; Pilar Lim; Richard C Shelton; Michael E Thase; Andrew Winokur; Luc Van Nueten; Husseini Manji; Wayne C Drevets
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 21.596

5.  Predicting treatment outcome in depression: an introduction into current concepts and challenges.

Authors:  Nicolas Rost; Elisabeth B Binder; Tanja M Brückl
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 5.270

6.  Raising Placebo Efficacy in Antidepressant Trials Across Decades Explained by Small-Study Effects: A Meta-Reanalysis.

Authors:  Lisa Holper
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 4.157

Review 7.  Consistently Modest Antidepressant Effects in Clinical Trials: the Role of Regulatory Requirements.

Authors:  Arif Khan; Kaysee Fahl Mar; Walter A Brown
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull       Date:  2021-06-01

8.  Optimizing prediction of response to antidepressant medications using machine learning and integrated genetic, clinical, and demographic data.

Authors:  Dekel Taliaz; Amit Spinrad; Ran Barzilay; Zohar Barnett-Itzhaki; Dana Averbuch; Omri Teltsh; Roy Schurr; Sne Darki-Morag; Bernard Lerer
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 9.  Neuropathic pain clinical trials: factors associated with decreases in estimated drug efficacy.

Authors:  Nanna B Finnerup; Simon Haroutounian; Ralf Baron; Robert H Dworkin; Ian Gilron; Maija Haanpaa; Troels S Jensen; Peter R Kamerman; Ewan McNicol; Andrew Moore; Srinivasa N Raja; Niels T Andersen; Emily S Sena; Blair H Smith; Andrew S C Rice; Nadine Attal
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 7.926

10.  Does the rising placebo response impact antihypertensive clinical trial outcomes? An analysis of data from the Food and Drug Administration 1990-2016.

Authors:  Arif Khan; Kaysee Fahl Mar; Joshua Schilling; Walter A Brown
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.