Literature DB >> 25895454

A Novel Methodology to Estimate the Treatment Effect in Presence of Highly Variable Placebo Response.

Roberto Gomeni1, Navin Goyal2, Françoise Bressolle1, Maurizio Fava3.   

Abstract

One of the main reasons for the inefficiency of multicenter randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in depression is the excessively high level of placebo response. The aim of this work was to propose a novel methodology to analyze RCTs based on the assumption that centers with high placebo response are less informative than the other centers for estimating the 'true' treatment effect (TE). A linear mixed-effect modeling approach for repeated measures (MMRM) was used as a reference approach. The new method for estimating TE was based on a nonlinear longitudinal modeling of clinical scores (NLMMRM). NLMMRM estimates TE by associating a weighting factor to the data collected in each center. The weight was defined by the posterior probability of detecting a clinically relevant difference between active treatment and placebo at that center. Data from five RCTs in depression were used to compare the performance of MMRM with NLMMRM. The results of the analyses showed an average improvement of ~15% in the TE estimated with NLMMRM when the center effect was included in the analyses. Opposite results were observed with MMRM: TE estimate was reduced by ~4% when the center effect was considered as covariate in the analysis. The novel NLMMRM approach provides a tool for controlling the confounding effect of high placebo response, to increase signal detection and to provide a more reliable estimate of the 'true' TE by controlling false negative results associated with excessively high placebo response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25895454      PMCID: PMC4569948          DOI: 10.1038/npp.2015.105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology        ISSN: 0893-133X            Impact factor:   7.853


  26 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of remission as the new standard in the treatment of depression.

Authors:  A A Nierenberg; E C Wright
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.384

2.  A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of aripiprazole adjunctive to antidepressant therapy among depressed outpatients with inadequate response to prior antidepressant therapy (ADAPT-A Study).

Authors:  Maurizio Fava; David Mischoulon; Dan Iosifescu; Janet Witte; Michael Pencina; Martina Flynn; Linda Harper; Michael Levy; Karl Rickels; Mark Pollack
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 17.659

Review 3.  Neurobiological mechanisms of the placebo effect.

Authors:  Fabrizio Benedetti; Helen S Mayberg; Tor D Wager; Christian S Stohler; Jon-Kar Zubieta
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Why do clinical trials fail? The problem of measurement error in clinical trials: time to test new paradigms?

Authors:  Kenneth A Kobak; John M Kane; Michael E Thase; Andrew A Nierenberg
Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.153

5.  Trial Simulation to estimate Type I error when a population window enrichment strategy is used to improve efficiency of clinical trials in depression.

Authors:  Roberto Gomeni; Emilio Merlo-Pich
Journal:  Eur Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 4.600

6.  Use of band-pass filter analysis to evaluate outcomes in an antidepressant trial for treatment resistant patients.

Authors:  Steven D Targum; Daniel J Burch; Mahnaz Asgharnejad; Timothy Petersen; Roberto Gomeni; Maurizio Fava
Journal:  Eur Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 4.600

Review 7.  Use of predictive models in CNS diseases.

Authors:  Roberto Gomeni
Journal:  Curr Opin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 5.547

Review 8.  Which factors predict placebo response in anxiety disorders and major depression? An analysis of placebo-controlled studies of escitalopram.

Authors:  Dan J Stein; David S Baldwin; Ornah T Dolberg; Nicolas Despiegel; Borwin Bandelow
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.384

9.  Model-based approach and signal detection theory to evaluate the performance of recruitment centers in clinical trials with antidepressant drugs.

Authors:  E Merlo-Pich; R Gomeni
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  Baseline severity of depression predicts antidepressant drug response relative to escitalopram.

Authors:  Clinton D Kilts; Alan G Wade; Henning F Andersen; Thomas E Schlaepfer
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.889

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Depressive disorders: Treatment failures and poor prognosis over the last 50 years.

Authors:  Thomas P Blackburn
Journal:  Pharmacol Res Perspect       Date:  2019-05-03

2.  Dose-Response Mixed Models for Repeated Measures - a New Method for Assessment of Dose-Response.

Authors:  Gustaf J Wellhagen; Bengt Hamrén; Maria C Kjellsson; Magnus Åstrand
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Simulation studies, 3D QSAR and molecular docking on a point mutation of protein kinase B with flavonoids targeting ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Suchitra Maheswari Ajjarapu; Apoorv Tiwari; Gohar Taj; Dev Bukhsh Singh; Sakshi Singh; Sundip Kumar
Journal:  BMC Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 2.483

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.