Literature DB >> 24955812

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of selegiline transdermal system in depressed adolescents.

Melissa P DelBello1, Thomas J Hochadel, Kimberly Blanchard Portland, Albert J Azzaro, Alain Katic, Arif Khan, Graham Emslie.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled flexible-dose, parallel group trial was conducted at 26 clinical investigational sites in the United States to examine the safety and efficacy of the selegiline transdermal system (STS) (EMSAM®) in adolescents (ages 12-17 years) meeting American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed. (DSM-IV) criteria for moderate to severe major depressive disorder (MDD) without psychotic features.
METHODS: Adolescents (n=308) with moderate to severe MDD were randomized to either STS (n=152) or placebo (n=156). Two hundred and fifteen (69.8%) subjects completed the study and 17 (5.5%) reported discontinuation because of adverse events (AEs). The primary efficacy outcome measure was the mean change from baseline to end of study (week 12 last observation carried forward [LOCF]) in the Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R) total score. Secondary outcome measures included end-point Clinical Global Impressions - Severity (CGI-S) and Clinical Global Impressions - Improvement (CGI-I).
RESULTS: Patients on STS or placebo had a significant decline from baseline (p<0.001) on their CDRS-R total score with mean reductions±SD as follows: STS 21.4±16.6; placebo 21.5±16.5. Both groups had similar response rates (58.6% vs. 59.3%) defined as CGI-I of 1 or 2 at study end. However, these between-group efficacy findings were without statistical significance. The overall incidence of reported AEs was 62.5% for STS-treated patients and 57.7% for placebo-treated patients. Most commonly reported AEs in STS or placebo groups were application site reactions (STS=24.3%; placebo=21.8%), headache (STS=17.1%; placebo=16.7%), and nausea (STS=7.2%; placebo=7.7%). Treatment groups did not differ on any laboratory parameters, vital signs, or electrocardiogram (ECG) findings. No suspected hypertensive crises were reported in the trial.
CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrated that the STS was safe and well tolerated in this adolescent sample. However, both STS-treated and placebo-treated subjects demonstrated a decline from baseline in depressive symptoms (CDRS-R total score) over the length of the study, without statistical superiority by either group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24955812      PMCID: PMC4137354          DOI: 10.1089/cap.2013.0138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 1044-5463            Impact factor:   2.576


  30 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacological treatment of depression in children and adolescents.

Authors:  R L Findling; M D Reed; J L Blumer
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  1999 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 2.  Suicide-related behaviors and anxiety in children and adolescents: a review.

Authors:  Ryan M Hill; Daniel Castellanos; Jeremy W Pettit
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2011-07-28

3.  Monoamine oxidase inhibitors: a new generation.

Authors:  Donald S Robinson
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull       Date:  2002

Review 4.  Epidemiology of childhood depressive disorders: a critical review.

Authors:  J E Fleming; D R Offord
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 8.829

5.  Hypertensive interactions between monoamine oxidase inhibitors and foodstuffs.

Authors:  B Blackwell; E Marley; J Price; D Taylor
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1967-04       Impact factor: 9.319

6.  Chronicity of depressive episode in relation to antidepressant-placebo response.

Authors:  A Khan; S R Dager; S Cohen; D H Avery; B Scherzo; D L Dunner
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 7.853

7.  Fluoxetine, cognitive-behavioral therapy, and their combination for adolescents with depression: Treatment for Adolescents With Depression Study (TADS) randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  John March; Susan Silva; Stephen Petrycki; John Curry; Karen Wells; John Fairbank; Barbara Burns; Marisa Domino; Steven McNulty; Benedetto Vitiello; Joanne Severe
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-08-18       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Somatic symptoms in primary affective disorder. Presence and relationship to the classification of depression.

Authors:  R C Casper; D E Redmond; M M Katz; C B Schaffer; J M Davis; S H Koslow
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1985-11

9.  Predictors of placebo response: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  C S Wilcox; J B Cohn; R D Linden; J F Heiser; P B Lucas; D L Morgan; D DeFrancisco
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull       Date:  1992

10.  A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the safety and efficacy of selegiline transdermal system without dietary restrictions in patients with major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Jay D Amsterdam
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.384

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Primary Pediatric Care Psychopharmacology: Focus on Medications for ADHD, Depression, and Anxiety.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Strawn; Eric T Dobson; Lisa L Giles
Journal:  Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care       Date:  2016-12-30

Review 2.  Annual Research Review: Defining and treating pediatric treatment-resistant depression.

Authors:  Jennifer B Dwyer; Argyris Stringaris; David A Brent; Michael H Bloch
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 8.982

3.  Placebo Response in Pediatric Anxiety Disorders: Implications for Clinical Trial Design and Interpretation.

Authors:  Eric T Dobson; Jeffrey R Strawn
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 2.576

Review 4.  EMSAM (deprenyl patch): how a promising antidepressant was underutilized.

Authors:  Gregory M Asnis; Margaret A Henderson
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 2.570

5.  Desvenlafaxine Versus Placebo in a Fluoxetine-Referenced Study of Children and Adolescents with Major Depressive Disorder.

Authors:  Karen L Weihs; William Murphy; Richat Abbas; Deborah Chiles; Richard D England; Sara Ramaker; Dalia B Wajsbrot
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 2.576

6.  Primary outcome reporting in adolescent depression clinical trials needs standardization.

Authors:  Andrea Monsour; Emma J Mew; Sagar Patel; Alyssandra Chee-A-Tow; Leena Saeed; Lucia Santos; Darren B Courtney; Priya N Watson; Suneeta Monga; Peter Szatmari; Martin Offringa; Nancy J Butcher
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 7.  Selegiline: a molecule with innovative potential.

Authors:  Tamás Tábi; László Vécsei; Moussa B Youdim; Peter Riederer; Éva Szökő
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 3.575

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.