Literature DB >> 23318413

A model of placebo response in antidepressant clinical trials.

Bret R Rutherford1, Steven P Roose.   

Abstract

Placebo response in clinical trials of antidepressant medications is substantial and has been increasing. High placebo response rates hamper efforts to detect signals of efficacy for new antidepressant medications, contributing to trial failures and delaying the delivery of new treatments to market. Media reports seize upon increasing placebo response and modest advantages for active drugs as reasons to question the value of antidepressant medication, which may further stigmatize treatments for depression and dissuade patients from accessing mental health care. Conversely, enhancing the factors responsible for placebo response may represent a strategy for improving available treatments for major depressive disorder. A conceptual framework describing the causes of placebo response is needed in order to develop strategies for minimizing placebo response in clinical trials, maximizing placebo response in clinical practice, and talking with depressed patients about the risks and benefits of antidepressant medications. In this review, the authors examine contributors to placebo response in antidepressant clinical trials and propose an explanatory model. Research aimed at reducing placebo response should focus on limiting patient expectancy and the intensity of therapeutic contact in antidepressant clinical trials, while the optimal strategy in clinical practice may be to combine active medication with a presentation and level of therapeutic contact designed to enhance treatment response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23318413      PMCID: PMC3628961          DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12040474

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0002-953X            Impact factor:   18.112


  56 in total

Review 1.  The double-blind variable placebo lead-in period: results from two antidepressant clinical trials.

Authors:  D E Faries; J H Heiligenstein; G D Tollefson; W Z Potter
Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.153

Review 2.  Context effects. Powerful therapies or methodological bias?

Authors:  Zelda Di Blasi; Jos Kleijnen
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.651

Review 3.  Interrater reliability in clinical trials of depressive disorders.

Authors:  Benoit H Mulsant; Kari B Kastango; Jules Rosen; Roslyn A Stone; Sati Mazumdar; Bruce G Pollock
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 18.112

Review 4.  The placebo effect: dissolving the expectancy versus conditioning debate.

Authors:  Steve Stewart-Williams; John Podd
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  The functional neuroanatomy of the placebo effect.

Authors:  Helen S Mayberg; J Arturo Silva; Steven K Brannan; Janet L Tekell; Roderick K Mahurin; Scott McGinnis; Paul A Jerabek
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 18.112

6.  The impact of restrictive entry criterion during the placebo lead-in period.

Authors:  R Landin; D J DeBrota; T A DeVries; W Z Potter; M A Demitrack
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  Placebo response in studies of major depression: variable, substantial, and growing.

Authors:  B Timothy Walsh; Stuart N Seidman; Robyn Sysko; Madelyn Gould
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-04-10       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Are placebo controls necessary to test new antidepressants and anxiolytics?

Authors:  Arif Khan; Shirin Khan; Walter A Brown
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.176

9.  Subject expectations of treatment effectiveness and outcome of treatment with an experimental antidepressant.

Authors:  Heather V Krell; Andrew F Leuchter; Melinda Morgan; Ian A Cook; Michelle Abrams
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.384

10.  Treatment expectancies, patient alliance, and outcome: further analyses from the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program.

Authors:  Björn Meyer; Paul A Pilkonis; Janice L Krupnick; Matthew K Egan; Samuel J Simmens; Stuart M Sotsky
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2002-08
View more
  90 in total

1.  Antidepressant treatment history and drug-placebo separation in a placebo-controlled trial in major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Aimee M Hunter; Ian A Cook; Molly Tartter; Simi K Sharma; Gregory D Disse; Andrew F Leuchter
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Factors contributing to the increasing placebo response in antidepressant trials.

Authors:  Siegfried Kasper; Markus Dold
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 49.548

Review 3.  A Meta-Analysis of Executive Dysfunction and Antidepressant Treatment Response in Late-Life Depression.

Authors:  Monique A Pimontel; David Rindskopf; Bret R Rutherford; Patrick J Brown; Steven P Roose; Joel R Sneed
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 4.105

4.  Effects of Open-Label, Adjunctive Ganaxolone on Persistent Depression Despite Adequate Antidepressant Treatment in Postmenopausal Women: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Laura E Dichtel; Maren Nyer; David Mischoulon; Maurizio Fava; Karen K Miller; Christina Dording; Lauren B Fisher; Cristina Cusin; Benjamin G Shapero; Paola Pedrelli; Allison S Kimball; Elizabeth M Rao
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 4.384

5.  Therapeutic alliance in antidepressant treatment: cause or effect of symptomatic levels?

Authors:  Sigal Zilcha-Mano; Steven P Roose; Jacques P Barber; Bret R Rutherford
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 17.659

6.  A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of Levomilnacipran ER 40-120mg/day for Prevention of Relapse in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder.

Authors:  Thomas Shiovitz; William M Greenberg; Changzheng Chen; Giovanna Forero; Carl P Gommoll
Journal:  Innov Clin Neurosci       Date:  2014-01

7.  Individual Differences in Expectancies for Change in Depression: Associations with Goal Pursuit and Daily Experiences.

Authors:  Kari M Eddington; Chris J Burgin; Catherine Majestic
Journal:  J Soc Clin Psychol       Date:  2016-10

8.  Resilience predicts remission in antidepressant treatment of geriatric depression.

Authors:  Kelsey T Laird; Helen Lavretsky; Natalie St Cyr; Prabha Siddarth
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 3.485

9.  A Machine Learning Approach to Identifying Placebo Responders in Late-Life Depression Trials.

Authors:  Sigal Zilcha-Mano; Steven P Roose; Patrick J Brown; Bret R Rutherford
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.105

10.  A double-blind efficacy and safety study of duloxetine fixed doses in children and adolescents with major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Graham J Emslie; Apurva Prakash; Qi Zhang; Beth A Pangallo; Mark E Bangs; John S March
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 2.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.