Literature DB >> 17180270

Surgical simulation: a current review.

B Dunkin1, G L Adrales, K Apelgren, J D Mellinger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Simulation tools offer the opportunity for the acquisition of surgical skill in the preclinical setting. Potential educational, safety, cost, and outcome benefits have brought increasing attention to this area in recent years. Utility in ongoing assessment and documentation of surgical skill, and in documenting proficiency and competency by standardized metrics, is another potential application of this technology. Significant work is yet to be done in validating simulation tools in the teaching of endoscopic, laparoscopic, and other surgical skills. Early data suggest face and construct validity, and the potential for clinical benefit, from simulation-based preclinical skills development. The purpose of this review is to highlight the status of simulation in surgical education, including available simulator options, and to briefly discuss the future impact of these modalities on surgical training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17180270     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-006-9072-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   3.453


  31 in total

1.  Evaluation of laparoscopic skills: a 2-year follow-up during residency training.

Authors:  A M Derossis; M Antoniuk; G M Fried
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Performance of a colonoscopy simulator: experience from a hands-on endoscopy course.

Authors:  L Aabakken; S Adamsen; A Kruse
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 10.093

3.  An open and flexible framework for computer aided surgical training.

Authors:  A Larsson
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2001

4.  Ongoing deficits in resident training for minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Adrian Park; Donald Witzke; Michael Donnelly
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Construct validity: experts and novices performing on the Xitact LS500 laparoscopy simulator.

Authors:  M Schijven; J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-02-17       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  The financial impact of teaching surgical residents in the operating room.

Authors:  M Bridges; D L Diamond
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  The influence of practice schedules in the learning of a complex bone-plating surgical task.

Authors:  Adam Dubrowski; David Backstein; Read Abughaduma; Dan Leidl; Heather Carnahan
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  A M Derossis; G M Fried; M Abrahamowicz; H H Sigman; J S Barkun; J L Meakins
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Ward evaluations: should they be abandoned?

Authors:  C J Kwolek; M B Donnelly; D A Sloan; S N Birrell; W E Strodel; R W Schwartz
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.192

10.  A new endoscopic simulator.

Authors:  S Bar-Meir
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 10.093

View more
  41 in total

Review 1.  Simulation in surgical education.

Authors:  Vanessa N Palter; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Toward construct validity for a novel sensorized instrument-based minimally invasive surgery simulation system.

Authors:  S Jayaraman; A L Trejos; M D Naish; A Lyle; R V Patel; C M Schlachta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  VR to OR: a review of the evidence that virtual reality simulation improves operating room performance.

Authors:  Neal E Seymour
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Camera navigation and tissue manipulation; are these laparoscopic skills related?

Authors:  Sonja N Buzink; Sanne M B I Botden; Jeroen Heemskerk; Richard H M Goossens; Huib de Ridder; Jack J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Surgical education and training in Australia and New Zealand.

Authors:  John P Collins; Ian D Civil; Michael Sugrue; Zsolt Balogh; Mellick J Chehade
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  Education in wrist arthroscopy: past, present and future.

Authors:  M C Obdeijn; N Bavinck; C Mathoulin; C M A M van der Horst; M P Schijven; G J M Tuijthof
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Prospective randomized controlled trial of simulator-based versus traditional in-surgery laparoscopic camera navigation training.

Authors:  Florian M Franzeck; Rachel Rosenthal; Markus K Muller; Antonio Nocito; Frauke Wittich; Christine Maurus; Daniel Dindo; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Dieter Hahnloser
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Virtual reality simulators for gastrointestinal endoscopy training.

Authors:  Konstantinos Triantafyllou; Lazaros Dimitrios Lazaridis; George D Dimitriadis
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-01-16

9.  Do basic psychomotor skills transfer between different image-based procedures?

Authors:  Sonja N Buzink; Richard H M Goossens; Erik J Schoon; Huib de Ridder; Jack J Jakimowicz
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 10.  The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review.

Authors:  O A J van der Meijden; M P Schijven
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.