Literature DB >> 10037304

The financial impact of teaching surgical residents in the operating room.

M Bridges1, D L Diamond.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There have been no published data regarding the cost of training surgical residents in the operating room.
METHODS: At the University of Tennessee Medical Center-Knoxville, in addition to resident-performed teaching cases, some cases are performed without the assistance of residents by the same faculty.
RESULTS: Sixty-two case categories involving 14,452 cases were compared for operative times alone. In 46 case categories (10,787 procedures), resident operative times were longer than faculty alone. In 16 case categories, resident operating times were shorter than faculty times. The net incremental operative time cost was 2,050 hours between July 1993 and March 1997. Assuming 4 years of operative training for 11 graduating chief residents, the cost per graduating resident was $47,970.
CONCLUSION: Extrapolated to a national annual cost for the 1,014 general surgery residents who completed training in the 1997 academic year, the annual cost of training residents in the operating room is $53 million. This high monetary cost suggests the need for digital skills, selection criteria, the development of training curriculum and resource facilities, the pre-operating room need for suturing and stapling techniques, and perhaps the acquisition of virtual surgery training modules.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10037304     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00289-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  156 in total

1.  Presidential Address: Surgical education in the third millennium.

Authors:  A Peracchia
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  A comparison of operative times in arthroscopic ACL reconstruction between orthopaedic faculty and residents: the financial impact of orthopaedic surgical training in the operating room.

Authors:  L R Farnworth; D E Lemay; T Wooldridge; J D Mabrey; M J Blaschak; T A DeCoster; D C Wascher; R C Schenck
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2001

3.  Ongoing deficits in resident training for minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Adrian Park; Donald Witzke; Michael Donnelly
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Virtual reality applied to procedural testing: the next era.

Authors:  Matthew B Bloom; Chantal L Rawn; Arnold D Salzberg; Thomas M Krummel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Training in tasks with different visual-spatial components does not improve virtual arthroscopy performance.

Authors:  P Ström; A Kjellin; L Hedman; T Wredmark; L Felländer-Tsai
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Laparoscopic skills training.

Authors:  L Villegas; B E Schneider; M P Callery; D B Jones
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopic virtual reality and box trainers: is one superior to the other?

Authors:  Y Munz; B D Kumar; K Moorthy; S Bann; A Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Objective assessment of technical skills in surgery.

Authors:  Krishna Moorthy; Yaron Munz; Sudip K Sarker; Ara Darzi
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-11-01

9.  How long do we need teaching in the operating room? The true costs of achieving surgical routine.

Authors:  Thomas Koperna
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2003-10-14       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Simulation in shoulder surgery.

Authors:  Henry B Colaço; Duncan Tennent
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2016-09-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.