Literature DB >> 1717265

Superhelical stress and nucleosome-mediated repression of 5S RNA gene transcription in vitro.

D J Clark1, A P Wolffe.   

Abstract

Nucleosomes were assembled on a plasmid carrying a Xenopus somatic 5S RNA gene prepared at different superhelix densities. The gene was preferentially assembled into a positioned nucleosome which was stable to superhelical stress. No evidence for a conformational change in the nucleosome was found, even under extreme negative superhelical stress. Transcription in an extract from Xenopus oocyte nuclei was repressed to a degree which depended on the number of nucleosomes assembled. Topoisomerase activity in the extract was effectively inhibited by camptothecin, which had no effect on transcription. Transcription of reconstitutes remained repressed relative to naked plasmids, and was independent of superhelix density. Transcripts from reconstitutes were derived solely from nucleosome-free genes. Thus, a histone octamer positioned on the gene was sufficient to block its transcription. Tryptic removal of the core histone tail domains had no effect on transcription at any superhelix density. Transcription of reconstitutes containing H3/H4 tetramers was also repressed, but not eliminated (unlike reconstitutes containing octamers), and repression was independent of superhelix density. We suggest that removal of histones H2A/H2B from the nucleosome facilitates activation of transcription in the extract. We conclude that superhelical stress alone does not activate transcription of a 5S RNA gene assembled into a nucleosome in vitro.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1717265      PMCID: PMC453070          DOI: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb04906.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO J        ISSN: 0261-4189            Impact factor:   11.598


  55 in total

1.  Negative supercoiling is not required for 5S RNA transcription in vitro.

Authors:  A P Wolffe; M T Andrews; E Crawford; R Losa; D D Brown
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1987-05-08       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Histone H1 represses transcription from minichromosomes assembled in vitro.

Authors:  A Shimamura; M Sapp; A Rodriguez-Campos; A Worcel
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Effects of DNA supercoiling on the topological properties of nucleosomes.

Authors:  M M Garner; G Felsenfeld; M H O'Dea; M Gellert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Structure of the two distinct types of minichromosomes that are assembled on DNA injected in Xenopus oocytes.

Authors:  M Ryoji; A Worcel
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Chromatin reconstituted from tandemly repeated cloned DNA fragments and core histones: a model system for study of higher order structure.

Authors:  R T Simpson; F Thoma; J M Brubaker
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Artificial nucleosome positioning sequences.

Authors:  T E Shrader; D M Crothers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Camptothecin induces protein-linked DNA breaks via mammalian DNA topoisomerase I.

Authors:  Y H Hsiang; R Hertzberg; S Hecht; L F Liu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1985-11-25       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Novobiocin inhibits passive chromatin assembly in vitro.

Authors:  L Sealy; M Cotten; R Chalkley
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1986-12-01       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Assembly of spaced chromatin involvement of ATP and DNA topoisomerase activity.

Authors:  G Almouzni; M Méchali
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1988-12-20       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  DNA gyrase can supercoil DNA circles as small as 174 base pairs.

Authors:  A D Bates; A Maxwell
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  23 in total

1.  MeCP2 driven transcriptional repression in vitro: selectivity for methylated DNA, action at a distance and contacts with the basal transcription machinery.

Authors:  N K Kaludov; A P Wolffe
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  The H3-H4 N-terminal tail domains are the primary mediators of transcription factor IIIA access to 5S DNA within a nucleosome.

Authors:  J M Vitolo; C Thiriet; J J Hayes
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Chromatin disruption and histone acetylation in regulation of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 long terminal repeat by thyroid hormone receptor.

Authors:  Shao-Chung Victor Hsia; Yun-Bo Shi
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Role of amino-terminal histone domains in chromatin replication.

Authors:  G Quintini; K Treuner; C Gruss; R Knippers
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  TTF-I determines the chromatin architecture of the active rDNA promoter.

Authors:  G Längst; P B Becker; I Grummt
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1998-06-01       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Determinants of chromatin disruption and transcriptional regulation instigated by the thyroid hormone receptor: hormone-regulated chromatin disruption is not sufficient for transcriptional activation.

Authors:  J Wong; Y B Shi; A P Wolffe
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1997-06-02       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  Large scale preparation of positively supercoiled DNA using the archaeal histone HMf.

Authors:  W A LaMarr; K M Sandman; J N Reeve; P C Dedon
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-04-15       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  The supercoiling state of DNA determines the handedness of both H3 and CENP-A nucleosomes.

Authors:  R Vlijm; S H Kim; P L De Zwart; Y Dalal; C Dekker
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 7.790

9.  Sin mutations of histone H3: influence on nucleosome core structure and function.

Authors:  H Kurumizaka; A P Wolffe
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Transcription activates RecA-promoted homologous pairing of nucleosomal DNA.

Authors:  H Kotani; E B Kmiec
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.