Literature DB >> 9372928

Sin mutations of histone H3: influence on nucleosome core structure and function.

H Kurumizaka1, A P Wolffe.   

Abstract

Sin mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae alleviate transcriptional defects that result from the inactivation of the yeast SWVI/SNF complex. We have investigated the structural and functional consequences for the nucleosome of Sin mutations in histone H3. We directly test the hypothesis that mutations in histone H3 leading to a SWI/SNF-independent (Sin) phenotype in yeast lead to nucleosomal destabilization. In certain instances this is shown to be true; however, nucleosomal destabilization does not always occur. Topoisomerase I-mediated relaxation of minichromosomes assembled with either mutant histone H3 or wild-type H3 together with histones H2A, H2B, and H4 indicates that DNA is constrained into nucleosomal structures containing either mutant or wild-type proteins. However, nucleosomes containing particular mutant H3 molecules (R116-H and T118-I) are more accessible to digestion by micrococcal nuclease and do not constrain DNA in a precise rotational position, as revealed by digestion with DNase I. This result establishes that Sin mutations in histone H3 located close to the dyad axis can destabilize histone-DNA contacts at the periphery of the nucleosome core. Other nucleosomes containing a distinct mutant H3 molecule (E105-K) associated with a Sin phenotype show very little change in nucleosome structure and stability compared to wild-type nucleosomes. Both mutant and wild-type nucleosomes continue to restrict the binding of either TATA-binding protein/transcription factor IIA (TFIIA) or the RNA polymerase III transcription machinery. Thus, different Sin mutations in histone H3 alter the stability of histone-DNA interactions to various extents in the nucleosome while maintaining the fundamental architecture of the nucleosome and contributing to a common Sin phenotype.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9372928      PMCID: PMC232553          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.17.12.6953

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  104 in total

1.  Histones H2A/H2B inhibit the interaction of transcription factor IIIA with the Xenopus borealis somatic 5S RNA gene in a nucleosome.

Authors:  J J Hayes; A P Wolffe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-02-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The nucleosomal core histone octamer at 3.1 A resolution: a tripartite protein assembly and a left-handed superhelix.

Authors:  G Arents; R W Burlingame; B C Wang; W E Love; E N Moudrianakis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-11-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Nucleosome positioning is determined by the (H3-H4)2 tetramer.

Authors:  F Dong; K E van Holde
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-12-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Structure of DNA in a nucleosome core at high salt concentration and at high temperature.

Authors:  J Bashkin; J J Hayes; T D Tullius; A P Wolffe
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1993-03-02       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  Preferential and asymmetric interaction of linker histones with 5S DNA in the nucleosome.

Authors:  J J Hayes; A P Wolffe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-07-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Histone-DNA contacts in a nucleosome core containing a Xenopus 5S rRNA gene.

Authors:  D Pruss; A P Wolffe
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1993-07-13       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Characterization of the yeast SWI1, SWI2, and SWI3 genes, which encode a global activator of transcription.

Authors:  C L Peterson; I Herskowitz
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1992-02-07       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  The yeast SNF2/SWI2 protein has DNA-stimulated ATPase activity required for transcriptional activation.

Authors:  B C Laurent; I Treich; M Carlson
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  RPD1 (SIN3/UME4) is required for maximal activation and repression of diverse yeast genes.

Authors:  M Vidal; R Strich; R E Esposito; R F Gaber
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  RPD3 encodes a second factor required to achieve maximum positive and negative transcriptional states in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  M Vidal; R F Gaber
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.272

View more
  35 in total

1.  Crystal structures of histone Sin mutant nucleosomes reveal altered protein-DNA interactions.

Authors:  Uma M Muthurajan; Yunhe Bao; Lawrence J Forsberg; Rajeswari S Edayathumangalam; Pamela N Dyer; Cindy L White; Karolin Luger
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Sin mutations alter inherent nucleosome mobility.

Authors:  Andrew Flaus; Chantal Rencurel; Helder Ferreira; Nicola Wiechens; Tom Owen-Hughes
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 3.  Application of mass spectrometry to the identification and quantification of histone post-translational modifications.

Authors:  Michael A Freitas; Amy R Sklenar; Mark R Parthun
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 4.429

4.  Structural basis of instability of the nucleosome containing a testis-specific histone variant, human H3T.

Authors:  Hiroaki Tachiwana; Wataru Kagawa; Akihisa Osakabe; Koichiro Kawaguchi; Tatsuya Shiga; Yoko Hayashi-Takanaka; Hiroshi Kimura; Hitoshi Kurumizaka
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The LRS and SIN domains: two structurally equivalent but functionally distinct nucleosomal surfaces required for transcriptional silencing.

Authors:  Christopher J Fry; Anne Norris; Michael Cosgrove; Jef D Boeke; Craig L Peterson
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-10-02       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Dispersed mutations in histone H3 that affect transcriptional repression and chromatin structure of the CHA1 promoter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Qiye He; Cailin Yu; Randall H Morse
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2008-07-25

7.  Scratching the (lateral) surface of chromatin regulation by histone modifications.

Authors:  Philipp Tropberger; Robert Schneider
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 15.369

8.  Acetylation of histone H3 at the nucleosome dyad alters DNA-histone binding.

Authors:  Mridula Manohar; Alex M Mooney; Justin A North; Robin J Nakkula; Jonathan W Picking; Annick Edon; Richard Fishel; Michael G Poirier; Jennifer J Ottesen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 9.  Histone exchange and histone modifications during transcription and aging.

Authors:  Chandrima Das; Jessica K Tyler
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr

10.  Mutations in both the structured domain and N-terminus of histone H2B bypass the requirement for Swi-Snf in yeast.

Authors:  J Recht; M A Osley
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-01-04       Impact factor: 11.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.