Literature DB >> 17165115

Friction dynamics of trocars.

J J van den Dobbelsteen1, A Schooleman, J Dankelman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In minimally invasive surgery, force feedback information on tissue manipulation is altered by friction between the instrument and the sealing mechanism of the trocar. It is unknown how the different sealing mechanisms of currently available trocars influence the friction forces. The current study investigated the dynamic changes in friction for various trocars at different instrument velocities.
METHODS: The friction characteristics for six common types of trocars were determined. A force sensor was attached to the shaft of a standard 5-mm disposable grasper to measure the forces required to move it through the trocars. Movement velocity and direction of the shaft were controlled by a servomotor. In addition, whether moistening the shaft reduced friction was tested.
RESULTS: The friction depended on the type of trocar, the movement velocity, and the movement direction, and varied between 0.25 and 3.0 N. Specifically, trocars with narrow sealing caps (i.e., high normal force onto the shaft) and trocars with thick sealing caps (i.e., large contact area) generate a high amount of friction. Moistening the shaft reduced friction 15% to 45%. For most trocars, large fluctuations in forces occur when the movement starts or when the direction reverses. The magnitude of these fluctuations varied between 0.2 and 2.5 N.
CONCLUSIONS: For some trocars, friction can be as great as the forces associated with instrument-tissue interaction. At movement reversals, friction fluctuates due to deformations of the rubber and silicon parts of the sealing mechanism. Such high variance can deteriorate surgical performance during high precision tasks (e.g., tissue manipulation) that typically involve many changes in movement direction. Comparisons of the investigated trocars indicate that the friction magnitude and variance can be reduced easily by changing the properties of the sealing cap or by lubricating the instruments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17165115     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-006-9105-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  8 in total

1.  Sensitivity of laparoscopic dissectors. What can you feel?

Authors:  K T den Boer; J L Herder; W Sjoerdsma; D W Meijer; D J Gouma; H G Stassen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  In vivo measurement of surgical gestures.

Authors:  Patrick Dubois; Quentin Thommen; Anne Claire Jambon
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Forces and displacements in colon surgery.

Authors:  H de Visser; E A M Heijnsdijk; J L Herder; P V Pistecky
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-06-04       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  What can the operator actually feel when performing a laparoscopy?

Authors:  G Picod; A C Jambon; D Vinatier; P Dubois
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Study of laparoscopic forces perception for defining simulation fidelity.

Authors:  Pablo Lamata; Enrique J Gómez; Francisco M Sánchez-Margallo; Félix Lamata; María Antolín; Samuel Rodríguez; Alfonso Oltra; Jesús Usón
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2006

6.  Nondigital afferent input in reactive control of fingertip forces during precision grip.

Authors:  C Häger-Ross; R S Johansson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Signals in tactile afferents from the fingers eliciting adaptive motor responses during precision grip.

Authors:  R S Johansson; G Westling
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Inter- and intraindividual variabilities of perforation forces of human and pig bowel tissue.

Authors:  E A M Heijnsdijk; M van der Voort; H de Visser; J Dankelman; D J Gouma
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-23       Impact factor: 4.584

  8 in total
  15 in total

1.  Limited value of haptics in virtual reality laparoscopic cholecystectomy training.

Authors:  Jonathan R Thompson; Anthony C Leonard; Charles R Doarn; Matt J Roesch; Timothy J Broderick
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Effects of experience on force perception threshold in minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  M Zhou; J Perreault; S D Schwaitzberg; C G L Cao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Effect of laparoscopic grasper force transmission ratio on grasp control.

Authors:  Eleonora P Westebring-van der Putten; John J van den Dobbelsteen; Richard H M Goossens; Jack J Jakimowicz; Jenny Dankelman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Force feedback and basic laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  Magdalena K Chmarra; Jenny Dankelman; John J van den Dobbelsteen; Frank-Willem Jansen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Effects of laparoscopic instrument and finger on force perception: a first step towards laparoscopic force-skills training.

Authors:  M S Raghu Prasad; M Manivannan; S M Chandramohan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons (EAES) consensus statement on the use of robotics in general surgery.

Authors:  Amir Szold; Roberto Bergamaschi; Ivo Broeders; Jenny Dankelman; Antonello Forgione; Thomas Langø; Andreas Melzer; Yoav Mintz; Salvador Morales-Conde; Michael Rhodes; Richard Satava; Chung-Ngai Tang; Ramon Vilallonga
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Perceiving haptic feedback in virtual reality simulators.

Authors:  Cecilie Våpenstad; Erlend Fagertun Hofstad; Thomas Langø; Ronald Mårvik; Magdalena Karolina Chmarra
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Tying different knots: what forces do we use?

Authors:  S P Rodrigues; T Horeman; J Dankelman; J J van den Dobbelsteen; F W Jansen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Limitations of haptic feedback devices on construct validity of the LapSim® virtual reality simulator.

Authors:  Cecilie Våpenstad; Erlend Fagertun Hofstad; Lars Eirik Bø; Magdalena Karolina Chmarra; Esther Kuhry; Gjermund Johnsen; Ronald Mårvik; Thomas Langø
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review.

Authors:  O A J van der Meijden; M P Schijven
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.